Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth

Relation between the truth and the sentence has the significant meaning in canonical processes. Process in fact is an instrument for finding the truth in assumed controversy. Final sentence is the result of the litigation proceedings, which is normal way finishing dispute. In the Code of Canon Law o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcin Królik
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II 2012-06-01
Series:Kościół i Prawo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://czasopisma.tnkul.pl/index.php/kip/article/view/378
id doaj-b27a9528322f4f448d80c7ea64b4d4a3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b27a9528322f4f448d80c7ea64b4d4a32020-11-25T00:46:47ZdeuTowarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła IIKościół i Prawo0208-79282544-58042012-06-0110195208375Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truthMarcin Królik0doktorant, Katedra Kościelnego Prawa Procesowego, Instytut Prawa Kanonicznego KUL, Wydział Prawa, Prawa Kanonicznego i Administracji, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 LublinRelation between the truth and the sentence has the significant meaning in canonical processes. Process in fact is an instrument for finding the truth in assumed controversy. Final sentence is the result of the litigation proceedings, which is normal way finishing dispute. In the Code of Canon Law of 1983, the legislator introduces in this context a new legal instrument, votum separatum. Judge in a collegiate tribunal has the right and obligation to pronounce of a sentence in compliance with his conscience, that is achieved with moral certitude. In the situation when the other judges made a different decision by an absolute majority of votes, judge who is convinced in his conscience about wrong decision can give a separate vote.http://czasopisma.tnkul.pl/index.php/kip/article/view/378votum separatumdyskusja sędziowskapewność moralnawyrok
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcin Królik
spellingShingle Marcin Królik
Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth
Kościół i Prawo
votum separatum
dyskusja sędziowska
pewność moralna
wyrok
author_facet Marcin Królik
author_sort Marcin Królik
title Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth
title_short Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth
title_full Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth
title_fullStr Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth
title_full_unstemmed Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth
title_sort votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth
publisher Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II
series Kościół i Prawo
issn 0208-7928
2544-5804
publishDate 2012-06-01
description Relation between the truth and the sentence has the significant meaning in canonical processes. Process in fact is an instrument for finding the truth in assumed controversy. Final sentence is the result of the litigation proceedings, which is normal way finishing dispute. In the Code of Canon Law of 1983, the legislator introduces in this context a new legal instrument, votum separatum. Judge in a collegiate tribunal has the right and obligation to pronounce of a sentence in compliance with his conscience, that is achieved with moral certitude. In the situation when the other judges made a different decision by an absolute majority of votes, judge who is convinced in his conscience about wrong decision can give a separate vote.
topic votum separatum
dyskusja sędziowska
pewność moralna
wyrok
url http://czasopisma.tnkul.pl/index.php/kip/article/view/378
work_keys_str_mv AT marcinkrolik votumseparatuminaprocessofsearchfortheobjectivetruth
_version_ 1725263173458591744