Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth
Relation between the truth and the sentence has the significant meaning in canonical processes. Process in fact is an instrument for finding the truth in assumed controversy. Final sentence is the result of the litigation proceedings, which is normal way finishing dispute. In the Code of Canon Law o...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II
2012-06-01
|
Series: | Kościół i Prawo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://czasopisma.tnkul.pl/index.php/kip/article/view/378 |
id |
doaj-b27a9528322f4f448d80c7ea64b4d4a3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b27a9528322f4f448d80c7ea64b4d4a32020-11-25T00:46:47ZdeuTowarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła IIKościół i Prawo0208-79282544-58042012-06-0110195208375Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truthMarcin Królik0doktorant, Katedra Kościelnego Prawa Procesowego, Instytut Prawa Kanonicznego KUL, Wydział Prawa, Prawa Kanonicznego i Administracji, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 LublinRelation between the truth and the sentence has the significant meaning in canonical processes. Process in fact is an instrument for finding the truth in assumed controversy. Final sentence is the result of the litigation proceedings, which is normal way finishing dispute. In the Code of Canon Law of 1983, the legislator introduces in this context a new legal instrument, votum separatum. Judge in a collegiate tribunal has the right and obligation to pronounce of a sentence in compliance with his conscience, that is achieved with moral certitude. In the situation when the other judges made a different decision by an absolute majority of votes, judge who is convinced in his conscience about wrong decision can give a separate vote.http://czasopisma.tnkul.pl/index.php/kip/article/view/378votum separatumdyskusja sędziowskapewność moralnawyrok |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marcin Królik |
spellingShingle |
Marcin Królik Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth Kościół i Prawo votum separatum dyskusja sędziowska pewność moralna wyrok |
author_facet |
Marcin Królik |
author_sort |
Marcin Królik |
title |
Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth |
title_short |
Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth |
title_full |
Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth |
title_fullStr |
Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth |
title_full_unstemmed |
Votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth |
title_sort |
votum separatum in a process of search for the objective truth |
publisher |
Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II |
series |
Kościół i Prawo |
issn |
0208-7928 2544-5804 |
publishDate |
2012-06-01 |
description |
Relation between the truth and the sentence has the significant meaning in canonical processes. Process in fact is an instrument for finding the truth in assumed controversy. Final sentence is the result of the litigation proceedings, which is normal way finishing dispute. In the Code of Canon Law of 1983, the legislator introduces in this context a new legal instrument, votum separatum. Judge in a collegiate tribunal has the right and obligation to pronounce of a sentence in compliance with his conscience, that is achieved with moral certitude. In the situation when the other judges made a different decision by an absolute majority of votes, judge who is convinced in his conscience about wrong decision can give a separate vote. |
topic |
votum separatum dyskusja sędziowska pewność moralna wyrok |
url |
http://czasopisma.tnkul.pl/index.php/kip/article/view/378 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcinkrolik votumseparatuminaprocessofsearchfortheobjectivetruth |
_version_ |
1725263173458591744 |