Perbandingan Teknik Insersi Klasik dengan Teknik Insersi Triple Airway Manoeuvre terhadap Angka Keberhasilan dan Kemudahan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Klasik

Various studies are seeking to find new methods to improve techniques of classic laryngeal mask airway (cLMA) insertion and reduce possible complications. This is a clinical study to investigate the succesrate and ease of insertion using triple airway maneuver(TAM) technique and to compare it with t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nelly Margaret Simanjuntak, Ezra Oktaliansah, Tinni T. Maskoen
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Padjadjaran 2016-12-01
Series:Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.fk.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/900
id doaj-b279186f44dd48f0b0f602e304af3bb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b279186f44dd48f0b0f602e304af3bb92020-11-24T22:46:38ZindUniversitas PadjadjaranJurnal Anestesi Perioperatif2337-79092338-84632016-12-0143170176Perbandingan Teknik Insersi Klasik dengan Teknik Insersi Triple Airway Manoeuvre terhadap Angka Keberhasilan dan Kemudahan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) KlasikNelly Margaret SimanjuntakEzra Oktaliansah0Tinni T. Maskoen1Departemen Anestesiologi dan Terapi Intensif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Padjadjaran/Rumah Sakit Dr. Hasan Sadikin BandungDepartemen Anestesiologi dan Terapi Intensif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Padjadjaran/Rumah Sakit Dr. Hasan Sadikin BandungVarious studies are seeking to find new methods to improve techniques of classic laryngeal mask airway (cLMA) insertion and reduce possible complications. This is a clinical study to investigate the succesrate and ease of insertion using triple airway maneuver(TAM) technique and to compare it with the classic technique. This experimental prospective study was conducted using the single-blind randomized controlled trial approach to patients underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia in the operating teather of Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung during the period of April 2015 to July 2015. Thirty six patients aged 18–60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–II status were randomly divided into two groups receiving either triple airway maneuver (TAM) technique or classic technique. In TAM technique, jaw thrust and mouth opening are facilitated by a technician and the anesthesiologist inserts the LMA. The collected data were analyzed using Fisher Exact and Kolmogorov Smirnov. The statistical analysis showed that the ratio of success rate and the ease of insertion of cLMA between both treatment groups was significantly different (p<0.05) where the TAM technique showed a higher success rate of insertion (72.2%) and less impacts on the oropharynx compared to the classic method (83.3%). Overall , in this study, the TAM technique is associated with higher of success rate compared to the classic technique and the ease of insertion of TAM method makes it worth to be considered as a safe and effective method to establish a secure airway in anesthetized patients.http://journal.fk.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/900Classic laryngeal mask airwayease of insertionsuccess ratetriple airway manoeuvre
collection DOAJ
language Indonesian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nelly Margaret Simanjuntak
Ezra Oktaliansah
Tinni T. Maskoen
spellingShingle Nelly Margaret Simanjuntak
Ezra Oktaliansah
Tinni T. Maskoen
Perbandingan Teknik Insersi Klasik dengan Teknik Insersi Triple Airway Manoeuvre terhadap Angka Keberhasilan dan Kemudahan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Klasik
Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif
Classic laryngeal mask airway
ease of insertion
success rate
triple airway manoeuvre
author_facet Nelly Margaret Simanjuntak
Ezra Oktaliansah
Tinni T. Maskoen
author_sort Nelly Margaret Simanjuntak
title Perbandingan Teknik Insersi Klasik dengan Teknik Insersi Triple Airway Manoeuvre terhadap Angka Keberhasilan dan Kemudahan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Klasik
title_short Perbandingan Teknik Insersi Klasik dengan Teknik Insersi Triple Airway Manoeuvre terhadap Angka Keberhasilan dan Kemudahan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Klasik
title_full Perbandingan Teknik Insersi Klasik dengan Teknik Insersi Triple Airway Manoeuvre terhadap Angka Keberhasilan dan Kemudahan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Klasik
title_fullStr Perbandingan Teknik Insersi Klasik dengan Teknik Insersi Triple Airway Manoeuvre terhadap Angka Keberhasilan dan Kemudahan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Klasik
title_full_unstemmed Perbandingan Teknik Insersi Klasik dengan Teknik Insersi Triple Airway Manoeuvre terhadap Angka Keberhasilan dan Kemudahan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Klasik
title_sort perbandingan teknik insersi klasik dengan teknik insersi triple airway manoeuvre terhadap angka keberhasilan dan kemudahan pemasangan laryngeal mask airway (lma) klasik
publisher Universitas Padjadjaran
series Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif
issn 2337-7909
2338-8463
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Various studies are seeking to find new methods to improve techniques of classic laryngeal mask airway (cLMA) insertion and reduce possible complications. This is a clinical study to investigate the succesrate and ease of insertion using triple airway maneuver(TAM) technique and to compare it with the classic technique. This experimental prospective study was conducted using the single-blind randomized controlled trial approach to patients underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia in the operating teather of Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung during the period of April 2015 to July 2015. Thirty six patients aged 18–60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–II status were randomly divided into two groups receiving either triple airway maneuver (TAM) technique or classic technique. In TAM technique, jaw thrust and mouth opening are facilitated by a technician and the anesthesiologist inserts the LMA. The collected data were analyzed using Fisher Exact and Kolmogorov Smirnov. The statistical analysis showed that the ratio of success rate and the ease of insertion of cLMA between both treatment groups was significantly different (p<0.05) where the TAM technique showed a higher success rate of insertion (72.2%) and less impacts on the oropharynx compared to the classic method (83.3%). Overall , in this study, the TAM technique is associated with higher of success rate compared to the classic technique and the ease of insertion of TAM method makes it worth to be considered as a safe and effective method to establish a secure airway in anesthetized patients.
topic Classic laryngeal mask airway
ease of insertion
success rate
triple airway manoeuvre
url http://journal.fk.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/900
work_keys_str_mv AT nellymargaretsimanjuntak perbandinganteknikinsersiklasikdenganteknikinsersitripleairwaymanoeuvreterhadapangkakeberhasilandankemudahanpemasanganlaryngealmaskairwaylmaklasik
AT ezraoktaliansah perbandinganteknikinsersiklasikdenganteknikinsersitripleairwaymanoeuvreterhadapangkakeberhasilandankemudahanpemasanganlaryngealmaskairwaylmaklasik
AT tinnitmaskoen perbandinganteknikinsersiklasikdenganteknikinsersitripleairwaymanoeuvreterhadapangkakeberhasilandankemudahanpemasanganlaryngealmaskairwaylmaklasik
_version_ 1725684556597559296