Solar Cycle Prediction
A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including forecasts for cycle 24. The review focuses on those aspects of the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of predicting the am...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2010-12-01
|
Series: | Living Reviews in Solar Physics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2010-6 |
id |
doaj-b271eddd2c9a4478a5fbe6d3f2d8fcf1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b271eddd2c9a4478a5fbe6d3f2d8fcf12020-11-24T20:57:44ZengSpringerOpenLiving Reviews in Solar Physics1614-49612010-12-0176Solar Cycle PredictionKristóf PetrovayA review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including forecasts for cycle 24. The review focuses on those aspects of the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of predicting the amplitude (and optionally the epoch) of an upcoming solar maximum no later than right after the start of the given cycle. Prediction methods form three main groups. Precursor methods rely on the value of some measure of solar activity or magnetism at a specified time to predict the amplitude of the following solar maximum. Their implicit assumption is that each numbered solar cycle is a consistent unit in itself, while solar activity seems to consist of a series of much less tightly intercorrelated individual cycles. Extrapolation methods, in contrast, are based on the premise that the physical process giving rise to the sunspot number record is statistically homogeneous, i.e., the mathematical regularities underlying its variations are the same at any point of time and, therefore, it lends itself to analysis and forecasting by time series methods. Finally, instead of an analysis of observational data alone, model based predictions use physically (more or less) consistent dynamo models in their attempts to predict solar activity. In their overall performance during the course of the last few solar cycles, precursor methods have clearly been superior to extrapolation methods. Nevertheless, most precursor methods overpredicted cycle 23, while some extrapolation methods may still be worth further study. Model based forecasts have not yet had a chance to prove their skills. One method that has yielded predictions consistently in the right range during the past few solar cycles is that of K. Schatten et al., whose approach is mainly based on the polar field precursor. The incipient cycle 24 will probably mark the end of the Modern Maximum, with the Sun switching to a state of less strong activity. It will therefore be an important testbed for cycle prediction methods and, by inference, for our understanding of the solar dynamo. http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2010-6Solar cycleSolar dynamo |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kristóf Petrovay |
spellingShingle |
Kristóf Petrovay Solar Cycle Prediction Living Reviews in Solar Physics Solar cycle Solar dynamo |
author_facet |
Kristóf Petrovay |
author_sort |
Kristóf Petrovay |
title |
Solar Cycle Prediction |
title_short |
Solar Cycle Prediction |
title_full |
Solar Cycle Prediction |
title_fullStr |
Solar Cycle Prediction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Solar Cycle Prediction |
title_sort |
solar cycle prediction |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Living Reviews in Solar Physics |
issn |
1614-4961 |
publishDate |
2010-12-01 |
description |
A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including forecasts for cycle 24. The review focuses on those aspects of the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of predicting the amplitude (and optionally the epoch) of an upcoming solar maximum no later than right after the start of the given cycle. Prediction methods form three main groups. Precursor methods rely on the value of some measure of solar activity or magnetism at a specified time to predict the amplitude of the following solar maximum. Their implicit assumption is that each numbered solar cycle is a consistent unit in itself, while solar activity seems to consist of a series of much less tightly intercorrelated individual cycles. Extrapolation methods, in contrast, are based on the premise that the physical process giving rise to the sunspot number record is statistically homogeneous, i.e., the mathematical regularities underlying its variations are the same at any point of time and, therefore, it lends itself to analysis and forecasting by time series methods. Finally, instead of an analysis of observational data alone, model based predictions use physically (more or less) consistent dynamo models in their attempts to predict solar activity. In their overall performance during the course of the last few solar cycles, precursor methods have clearly been superior to extrapolation methods. Nevertheless, most precursor methods overpredicted cycle 23, while some extrapolation methods may still be worth further study. Model based forecasts have not yet had a chance to prove their skills. One method that has yielded predictions consistently in the right range during the past few solar cycles is that of K. Schatten et al., whose approach is mainly based on the polar field precursor. The incipient cycle 24 will probably mark the end of the Modern Maximum, with the Sun switching to a state of less strong activity. It will therefore be an important testbed for cycle prediction methods and, by inference, for our understanding of the solar dynamo. |
topic |
Solar cycle Solar dynamo |
url |
http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2010-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kristofpetrovay solarcycleprediction |
_version_ |
1716787739818459136 |