Theorizing power in political ecology: the 'where' of power in resource governance projects

Power and politics have been central topics from the early days of Political Ecology. There are different and sometimes conflicting conceptualizations of power in this field that portray power alternatively as a resource, personal attribute or relation. The aim of this article is to contribute to th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helene Ahlborg, Andrea J Nightingale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Libraries 2018-09-01
Series:Journal of Political Ecology
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/22804
id doaj-b26f4ad98d1343c99dc15643a32a6f39
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b26f4ad98d1343c99dc15643a32a6f392020-11-24T22:07:36ZengUniversity of Arizona LibrariesJournal of Political Ecology1073-04512018-09-0125138140110.2458/v25i1.2280422304Theorizing power in political ecology: the 'where' of power in resource governance projectsHelene Ahlborg0Andrea J Nightingale1University of Gothenburg and Chalmers University of TechnologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesPower and politics have been central topics from the early days of Political Ecology. There are different and sometimes conflicting conceptualizations of power in this field that portray power alternatively as a resource, personal attribute or relation. The aim of this article is to contribute to theorizations of power by probing contesting views regarding its role in societal change and by presenting a specific conceptualization of power, one which draws on political ecology and sociotechnical approaches in science and technology studies. We review how power has been conceptualized in the political ecology field and identify three trends that shaped current discussions. We then develop our conceptual discussion and ask explicitly where power emerges in processes of resource governance projects. We identify four locations that we illustrate empirically through an example of rural electrification in Tanzania that aimed at catalyzing social and economic development by providing renewable energy-based electricity services. Our analysis supports the argument that power is relational and productive, and it draws on science and technology studies to bring to the fore the critical role of non-human elements in co-constitution of society – technology – nature. This leads us to see the exercise of power as having contradictory and ambiguous effects. We conclude that by exploring the tension between human agency and constitutive power, we keep the politics alive throughout the analysis and are able to show why intentional choices and actions really matter for how resource governance projects play out in everyday life.https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/22804
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helene Ahlborg
Andrea J Nightingale
spellingShingle Helene Ahlborg
Andrea J Nightingale
Theorizing power in political ecology: the 'where' of power in resource governance projects
Journal of Political Ecology
author_facet Helene Ahlborg
Andrea J Nightingale
author_sort Helene Ahlborg
title Theorizing power in political ecology: the 'where' of power in resource governance projects
title_short Theorizing power in political ecology: the 'where' of power in resource governance projects
title_full Theorizing power in political ecology: the 'where' of power in resource governance projects
title_fullStr Theorizing power in political ecology: the 'where' of power in resource governance projects
title_full_unstemmed Theorizing power in political ecology: the 'where' of power in resource governance projects
title_sort theorizing power in political ecology: the 'where' of power in resource governance projects
publisher University of Arizona Libraries
series Journal of Political Ecology
issn 1073-0451
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Power and politics have been central topics from the early days of Political Ecology. There are different and sometimes conflicting conceptualizations of power in this field that portray power alternatively as a resource, personal attribute or relation. The aim of this article is to contribute to theorizations of power by probing contesting views regarding its role in societal change and by presenting a specific conceptualization of power, one which draws on political ecology and sociotechnical approaches in science and technology studies. We review how power has been conceptualized in the political ecology field and identify three trends that shaped current discussions. We then develop our conceptual discussion and ask explicitly where power emerges in processes of resource governance projects. We identify four locations that we illustrate empirically through an example of rural electrification in Tanzania that aimed at catalyzing social and economic development by providing renewable energy-based electricity services. Our analysis supports the argument that power is relational and productive, and it draws on science and technology studies to bring to the fore the critical role of non-human elements in co-constitution of society – technology – nature. This leads us to see the exercise of power as having contradictory and ambiguous effects. We conclude that by exploring the tension between human agency and constitutive power, we keep the politics alive throughout the analysis and are able to show why intentional choices and actions really matter for how resource governance projects play out in everyday life.
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/22804
work_keys_str_mv AT heleneahlborg theorizingpowerinpoliticalecologythewhereofpowerinresourcegovernanceprojects
AT andreajnightingale theorizingpowerinpoliticalecologythewhereofpowerinresourcegovernanceprojects
_version_ 1725819539860488192