Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries

Purpose - he purpose of this paper is to carry out a review of the academic literature about corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR) highlighting aspects that help us to define socially irresponsible behaviour and its relationship with socially responsible behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Riera, María Iborra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2017-07-01
Series:European Journal of Management and Business Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-009
id doaj-b265c94ed7b14c4e8b61ad5bb7798a58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b265c94ed7b14c4e8b61ad5bb7798a582020-11-24T20:45:56ZengEmerald PublishingEuropean Journal of Management and Business Economics2444-84512444-84942017-07-0126214616210.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-009595549Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundariesMarta Riera0María Iborra1Universitat de València, Valencia, SpainUniversitat de València, Valencia, SpainPurpose - he purpose of this paper is to carry out a review of the academic literature about corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR) highlighting aspects that help us to define socially irresponsible behaviour and its relationship with socially responsible behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Through a Boolean search of studies related to terms of irresponsibility undertaken from 1956 to October 2016, the authors develop a review of the literature focussing on the main perspectives used for defining the term of CSIR. Findings - The paper provides a framework of three main dimensions for understanding the differences in the literature that defines CSIR: who defines irresponsible behaviour, an impartial observer or a specific group of stakeholders, whether it is a firm strategy or a punctual action and which is the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and CSIR, continuity vs orthogonal relationship. Originality/value - The paper provides and extensive and original review of a key construct, CSIR, and develops some insights about its antecedents and consequences. The authors try to provide light to the contradictory situation where a growing interest in CSR and the increase in voluntary commitments adopted by company leaders incorporating CSR into their strategies are, paradoxically, increasingly associated with CSIR.https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-009Corporate social responsibilityUnethical behaviourCorruptionFraudCorporate social irresponsibility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marta Riera
María Iborra
spellingShingle Marta Riera
María Iborra
Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries
European Journal of Management and Business Economics
Corporate social responsibility
Unethical behaviour
Corruption
Fraud
Corporate social irresponsibility
author_facet Marta Riera
María Iborra
author_sort Marta Riera
title Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries
title_short Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries
title_full Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries
title_fullStr Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries
title_full_unstemmed Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries
title_sort corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries
publisher Emerald Publishing
series European Journal of Management and Business Economics
issn 2444-8451
2444-8494
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Purpose - he purpose of this paper is to carry out a review of the academic literature about corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR) highlighting aspects that help us to define socially irresponsible behaviour and its relationship with socially responsible behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Through a Boolean search of studies related to terms of irresponsibility undertaken from 1956 to October 2016, the authors develop a review of the literature focussing on the main perspectives used for defining the term of CSIR. Findings - The paper provides a framework of three main dimensions for understanding the differences in the literature that defines CSIR: who defines irresponsible behaviour, an impartial observer or a specific group of stakeholders, whether it is a firm strategy or a punctual action and which is the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and CSIR, continuity vs orthogonal relationship. Originality/value - The paper provides and extensive and original review of a key construct, CSIR, and develops some insights about its antecedents and consequences. The authors try to provide light to the contradictory situation where a growing interest in CSR and the increase in voluntary commitments adopted by company leaders incorporating CSR into their strategies are, paradoxically, increasingly associated with CSIR.
topic Corporate social responsibility
Unethical behaviour
Corruption
Fraud
Corporate social irresponsibility
url https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-009
work_keys_str_mv AT martariera corporatesocialirresponsibilityreviewandconceptualboundaries
AT mariaiborra corporatesocialirresponsibilityreviewandconceptualboundaries
_version_ 1716813679447506944