Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries
Purpose - he purpose of this paper is to carry out a review of the academic literature about corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR) highlighting aspects that help us to define socially irresponsible behaviour and its relationship with socially responsible behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - T...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Emerald Publishing
2017-07-01
|
Series: | European Journal of Management and Business Economics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-009 |
id |
doaj-b265c94ed7b14c4e8b61ad5bb7798a58 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b265c94ed7b14c4e8b61ad5bb7798a582020-11-24T20:45:56ZengEmerald PublishingEuropean Journal of Management and Business Economics2444-84512444-84942017-07-0126214616210.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-009595549Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundariesMarta Riera0María Iborra1Universitat de València, Valencia, SpainUniversitat de València, Valencia, SpainPurpose - he purpose of this paper is to carry out a review of the academic literature about corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR) highlighting aspects that help us to define socially irresponsible behaviour and its relationship with socially responsible behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Through a Boolean search of studies related to terms of irresponsibility undertaken from 1956 to October 2016, the authors develop a review of the literature focussing on the main perspectives used for defining the term of CSIR. Findings - The paper provides a framework of three main dimensions for understanding the differences in the literature that defines CSIR: who defines irresponsible behaviour, an impartial observer or a specific group of stakeholders, whether it is a firm strategy or a punctual action and which is the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and CSIR, continuity vs orthogonal relationship. Originality/value - The paper provides and extensive and original review of a key construct, CSIR, and develops some insights about its antecedents and consequences. The authors try to provide light to the contradictory situation where a growing interest in CSR and the increase in voluntary commitments adopted by company leaders incorporating CSR into their strategies are, paradoxically, increasingly associated with CSIR.https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-009Corporate social responsibilityUnethical behaviourCorruptionFraudCorporate social irresponsibility |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marta Riera María Iborra |
spellingShingle |
Marta Riera María Iborra Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries European Journal of Management and Business Economics Corporate social responsibility Unethical behaviour Corruption Fraud Corporate social irresponsibility |
author_facet |
Marta Riera María Iborra |
author_sort |
Marta Riera |
title |
Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries |
title_short |
Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries |
title_full |
Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries |
title_fullStr |
Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries |
title_sort |
corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries |
publisher |
Emerald Publishing |
series |
European Journal of Management and Business Economics |
issn |
2444-8451 2444-8494 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
Purpose - he purpose of this paper is to carry out a review of the academic literature about corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR) highlighting aspects that help us to define socially irresponsible behaviour and its relationship with socially responsible behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Through a Boolean search of studies related to terms of irresponsibility undertaken from 1956 to October 2016, the authors develop a review of the literature focussing on the main perspectives used for defining the term of CSIR. Findings - The paper provides a framework of three main dimensions for understanding the differences in the literature that defines CSIR: who defines irresponsible behaviour, an impartial observer or a specific group of stakeholders, whether it is a firm strategy or a punctual action and which is the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and CSIR, continuity vs orthogonal relationship. Originality/value - The paper provides and extensive and original review of a key construct, CSIR, and develops some insights about its antecedents and consequences. The authors try to provide light to the contradictory situation where a growing interest in CSR and the increase in voluntary commitments adopted by company leaders incorporating CSR into their strategies are, paradoxically, increasingly associated with CSIR. |
topic |
Corporate social responsibility Unethical behaviour Corruption Fraud Corporate social irresponsibility |
url |
https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT martariera corporatesocialirresponsibilityreviewandconceptualboundaries AT mariaiborra corporatesocialirresponsibilityreviewandconceptualboundaries |
_version_ |
1716813679447506944 |