Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique

Purpose. To report a rare complication presenting as an isolated central epiretinal membrane (ERM) related to fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique. Methods. Five patients who received fovea-sparing ILM peeling were enrolled. Postoperatively, an isolated central ERM develo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yen-Chih Chen, San-Ni Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654604
id doaj-b252296b8da94193b5d41d75745e1713
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b252296b8da94193b5d41d75745e17132021-04-26T00:04:34ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-00582021-01-01202110.1155/2021/6654604Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling TechniqueYen-Chih Chen0San-Ni Chen1Department of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyPurpose. To report a rare complication presenting as an isolated central epiretinal membrane (ERM) related to fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique. Methods. Five patients who received fovea-sparing ILM peeling were enrolled. Postoperatively, an isolated central ERM developed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate the serial anatomic change. Results. Among the five included patients, one patient had high myopia with foveoschisis, two patients had vitreomacular traction, and two patients had proliferative diabetic retinopathy with tractional retinal detachment and a fovea cyst. With an average of 5.80 months, OCT showed the gradual development of the isolated central ERM with severe fovea distortion. Four patients received secondary revision surgery, with improvement of the fovea contour and visual acuity. Conclusion. The fovea-sparing ILM peeling technique may cause a rare but serious complication as the isolated central ERM, which would cause significant fovea distortion as well as visual deterioration. Timely detection and intervention is recommended to prevent further visual loss. This trial is registered with NCT04445142.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654604
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yen-Chih Chen
San-Ni Chen
spellingShingle Yen-Chih Chen
San-Ni Chen
Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique
Journal of Ophthalmology
author_facet Yen-Chih Chen
San-Ni Chen
author_sort Yen-Chih Chen
title Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique
title_short Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique
title_full Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique
title_fullStr Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique
title_full_unstemmed Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique
title_sort isolated central epiretinal membrane: a rare complication of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling technique
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2090-0058
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose. To report a rare complication presenting as an isolated central epiretinal membrane (ERM) related to fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique. Methods. Five patients who received fovea-sparing ILM peeling were enrolled. Postoperatively, an isolated central ERM developed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate the serial anatomic change. Results. Among the five included patients, one patient had high myopia with foveoschisis, two patients had vitreomacular traction, and two patients had proliferative diabetic retinopathy with tractional retinal detachment and a fovea cyst. With an average of 5.80 months, OCT showed the gradual development of the isolated central ERM with severe fovea distortion. Four patients received secondary revision surgery, with improvement of the fovea contour and visual acuity. Conclusion. The fovea-sparing ILM peeling technique may cause a rare but serious complication as the isolated central ERM, which would cause significant fovea distortion as well as visual deterioration. Timely detection and intervention is recommended to prevent further visual loss. This trial is registered with NCT04445142.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654604
work_keys_str_mv AT yenchihchen isolatedcentralepiretinalmembraneararecomplicationoffoveasparinginternallimitingmembranepeelingtechnique
AT sannichen isolatedcentralepiretinalmembraneararecomplicationoffoveasparinginternallimitingmembranepeelingtechnique
_version_ 1714657590800023552