Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique
Purpose. To report a rare complication presenting as an isolated central epiretinal membrane (ERM) related to fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique. Methods. Five patients who received fovea-sparing ILM peeling were enrolled. Postoperatively, an isolated central ERM develo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654604 |
id |
doaj-b252296b8da94193b5d41d75745e1713 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b252296b8da94193b5d41d75745e17132021-04-26T00:04:34ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-00582021-01-01202110.1155/2021/6654604Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling TechniqueYen-Chih Chen0San-Ni Chen1Department of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyPurpose. To report a rare complication presenting as an isolated central epiretinal membrane (ERM) related to fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique. Methods. Five patients who received fovea-sparing ILM peeling were enrolled. Postoperatively, an isolated central ERM developed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate the serial anatomic change. Results. Among the five included patients, one patient had high myopia with foveoschisis, two patients had vitreomacular traction, and two patients had proliferative diabetic retinopathy with tractional retinal detachment and a fovea cyst. With an average of 5.80 months, OCT showed the gradual development of the isolated central ERM with severe fovea distortion. Four patients received secondary revision surgery, with improvement of the fovea contour and visual acuity. Conclusion. The fovea-sparing ILM peeling technique may cause a rare but serious complication as the isolated central ERM, which would cause significant fovea distortion as well as visual deterioration. Timely detection and intervention is recommended to prevent further visual loss. This trial is registered with NCT04445142.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654604 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yen-Chih Chen San-Ni Chen |
spellingShingle |
Yen-Chih Chen San-Ni Chen Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique Journal of Ophthalmology |
author_facet |
Yen-Chih Chen San-Ni Chen |
author_sort |
Yen-Chih Chen |
title |
Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique |
title_short |
Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique |
title_full |
Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique |
title_fullStr |
Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique |
title_full_unstemmed |
Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique |
title_sort |
isolated central epiretinal membrane: a rare complication of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling technique |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Journal of Ophthalmology |
issn |
2090-0058 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Purpose. To report a rare complication presenting as an isolated central epiretinal membrane (ERM) related to fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique. Methods. Five patients who received fovea-sparing ILM peeling were enrolled. Postoperatively, an isolated central ERM developed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate the serial anatomic change. Results. Among the five included patients, one patient had high myopia with foveoschisis, two patients had vitreomacular traction, and two patients had proliferative diabetic retinopathy with tractional retinal detachment and a fovea cyst. With an average of 5.80 months, OCT showed the gradual development of the isolated central ERM with severe fovea distortion. Four patients received secondary revision surgery, with improvement of the fovea contour and visual acuity. Conclusion. The fovea-sparing ILM peeling technique may cause a rare but serious complication as the isolated central ERM, which would cause significant fovea distortion as well as visual deterioration. Timely detection and intervention is recommended to prevent further visual loss. This trial is registered with NCT04445142. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654604 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yenchihchen isolatedcentralepiretinalmembraneararecomplicationoffoveasparinginternallimitingmembranepeelingtechnique AT sannichen isolatedcentralepiretinalmembraneararecomplicationoffoveasparinginternallimitingmembranepeelingtechnique |
_version_ |
1714657590800023552 |