Obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women – implications for genetic linkage studies

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To investigate obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We identified consecutive 635 sib pairs from the Birth Registry data of Kuopio University Hospital who had their first...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heinonen Seppo, Heiskanen Nonna, Kirkinen Pertti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2003-02-01
Series:BMC Women's Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/3/1
id doaj-b25104f7070444979f39cb145d034f6d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b25104f7070444979f39cb145d034f6d2020-11-25T01:03:38ZengBMCBMC Women's Health1472-68742003-02-0131110.1186/1472-6874-3-1Obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women – implications for genetic linkage studiesHeinonen SeppoHeiskanen NonnaKirkinen Pertti<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To investigate obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We identified consecutive 635 sib pairs from the Birth Registry data of Kuopio University Hospital who had their first delivery between January 1989 and December 1999 in our institution. Of these, in 530 pairs both sisters had non-preeclamptic pregnancies (the reference group), in 63 pairs one of the sisters had preeclampsia and the unaffected sisters were studied (study group I). In 42 pairs both sister's first delivery was affected (study group II). Pregnancy outcome measures in these groups were compared.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Unaffected sisters of the index patients had uncompromised fetal growth in their pregnancies, and overall, as good obstetric outcomes as in the reference group. The data on affected sisters of the index patients showed an increased prematurity rate, and increased incidences of low birth weight and small-for-gestational age infants, as expected.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Unaffected sisters of the index patients had no signs of utero-placental insufficiency and they were at low risk with regard to adverse obstetric outcome, whereas affected sisters were high-risk. Clinically, affected versus unaffected status appears to be clear-cut in first-degree relatives regardless of their genetic susceptibility and unaffected sisters do not need special antepartum surveillance.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/3/1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heinonen Seppo
Heiskanen Nonna
Kirkinen Pertti
spellingShingle Heinonen Seppo
Heiskanen Nonna
Kirkinen Pertti
Obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women – implications for genetic linkage studies
BMC Women's Health
author_facet Heinonen Seppo
Heiskanen Nonna
Kirkinen Pertti
author_sort Heinonen Seppo
title Obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women – implications for genetic linkage studies
title_short Obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women – implications for genetic linkage studies
title_full Obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women – implications for genetic linkage studies
title_fullStr Obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women – implications for genetic linkage studies
title_full_unstemmed Obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women – implications for genetic linkage studies
title_sort obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women – implications for genetic linkage studies
publisher BMC
series BMC Women's Health
issn 1472-6874
publishDate 2003-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To investigate obstetric prognosis in sisters of preeclamptic women.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We identified consecutive 635 sib pairs from the Birth Registry data of Kuopio University Hospital who had their first delivery between January 1989 and December 1999 in our institution. Of these, in 530 pairs both sisters had non-preeclamptic pregnancies (the reference group), in 63 pairs one of the sisters had preeclampsia and the unaffected sisters were studied (study group I). In 42 pairs both sister's first delivery was affected (study group II). Pregnancy outcome measures in these groups were compared.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Unaffected sisters of the index patients had uncompromised fetal growth in their pregnancies, and overall, as good obstetric outcomes as in the reference group. The data on affected sisters of the index patients showed an increased prematurity rate, and increased incidences of low birth weight and small-for-gestational age infants, as expected.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Unaffected sisters of the index patients had no signs of utero-placental insufficiency and they were at low risk with regard to adverse obstetric outcome, whereas affected sisters were high-risk. Clinically, affected versus unaffected status appears to be clear-cut in first-degree relatives regardless of their genetic susceptibility and unaffected sisters do not need special antepartum surveillance.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/3/1
work_keys_str_mv AT heinonenseppo obstetricprognosisinsistersofpreeclampticwomenimplicationsforgeneticlinkagestudies
AT heiskanennonna obstetricprognosisinsistersofpreeclampticwomenimplicationsforgeneticlinkagestudies
AT kirkinenpertti obstetricprognosisinsistersofpreeclampticwomenimplicationsforgeneticlinkagestudies
_version_ 1725200210410340352