The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy
This paper examines a farmer’s channel selection in a supply chain led by a retailer, considering carbon emissions and products’ deterioration. Three channels—online channels, retail channels, and dual channels—are proposed. The inventory model of perishable p...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2765 |
id |
doaj-b250bda96c7542579e10fece5ab1aa03 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b250bda96c7542579e10fece5ab1aa032020-11-25T01:31:22ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-05-011110276510.3390/su11102765su11102765The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax PolicyCong Zheng0Quangui Pang1Tianpei Li2Guizheng Wang3Yiji Cai4Lei Yang5School of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Design, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaThis paper examines a farmer’s channel selection in a supply chain led by a retailer, considering carbon emissions and products’ deterioration. Three channels—online channels, retail channels, and dual channels—are proposed. The inventory model of perishable products and the two-stage Stackelberg game model are used to illustrate the operational process. To compare performances of the three channel structures, we further determine the critical points consisting of the profits and the carbon emissions among these channels. The results provide useful insights for supply chain members and the government. Farmers can choose a channel to optimize profit with respect to deterioration rate and product yield, but it might conflict with the aim of least carbon emissions. When the deterioration rate is high, the online channel is not a suitable choice. For the government, the carbon tax contributes to the reduction of carbon emissions, but it also leads to the loss of the farmer’s profit. Additionally, numerical results further illustrate that, from the perspective of the government, transporting and inventory processes are two major sources of emissions, and it is essential to implement carbon tax and exploit low-carbon transportation.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2765agricultural productchannel selectioncarbon taxsustainability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cong Zheng Quangui Pang Tianpei Li Guizheng Wang Yiji Cai Lei Yang |
spellingShingle |
Cong Zheng Quangui Pang Tianpei Li Guizheng Wang Yiji Cai Lei Yang The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy Sustainability agricultural product channel selection carbon tax sustainability |
author_facet |
Cong Zheng Quangui Pang Tianpei Li Guizheng Wang Yiji Cai Lei Yang |
author_sort |
Cong Zheng |
title |
The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy |
title_short |
The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy |
title_full |
The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy |
title_fullStr |
The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy |
title_sort |
farmers’ channel selection and sustainable analysis under carbon tax policy |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
This paper examines a farmer’s channel selection in a supply chain led by a retailer, considering carbon emissions and products’ deterioration. Three channels—online channels, retail channels, and dual channels—are proposed. The inventory model of perishable products and the two-stage Stackelberg game model are used to illustrate the operational process. To compare performances of the three channel structures, we further determine the critical points consisting of the profits and the carbon emissions among these channels. The results provide useful insights for supply chain members and the government. Farmers can choose a channel to optimize profit with respect to deterioration rate and product yield, but it might conflict with the aim of least carbon emissions. When the deterioration rate is high, the online channel is not a suitable choice. For the government, the carbon tax contributes to the reduction of carbon emissions, but it also leads to the loss of the farmer’s profit. Additionally, numerical results further illustrate that, from the perspective of the government, transporting and inventory processes are two major sources of emissions, and it is essential to implement carbon tax and exploit low-carbon transportation. |
topic |
agricultural product channel selection carbon tax sustainability |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2765 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT congzheng thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT quanguipang thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT tianpeili thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT guizhengwang thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT yijicai thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT leiyang thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT congzheng farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT quanguipang farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT tianpeili farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT guizhengwang farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT yijicai farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy AT leiyang farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy |
_version_ |
1725087024587735040 |