The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy

This paper examines a farmer’s channel selection in a supply chain led by a retailer, considering carbon emissions and products’ deterioration. Three channels—online channels, retail channels, and dual channels—are proposed. The inventory model of perishable p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cong Zheng, Quangui Pang, Tianpei Li, Guizheng Wang, Yiji Cai, Lei Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2765
id doaj-b250bda96c7542579e10fece5ab1aa03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b250bda96c7542579e10fece5ab1aa032020-11-25T01:31:22ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-05-011110276510.3390/su11102765su11102765The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax PolicyCong Zheng0Quangui Pang1Tianpei Li2Guizheng Wang3Yiji Cai4Lei Yang5School of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Design, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaThis paper examines a farmer’s channel selection in a supply chain led by a retailer, considering carbon emissions and products’ deterioration. Three channels—online channels, retail channels, and dual channels—are proposed. The inventory model of perishable products and the two-stage Stackelberg game model are used to illustrate the operational process. To compare performances of the three channel structures, we further determine the critical points consisting of the profits and the carbon emissions among these channels. The results provide useful insights for supply chain members and the government. Farmers can choose a channel to optimize profit with respect to deterioration rate and product yield, but it might conflict with the aim of least carbon emissions. When the deterioration rate is high, the online channel is not a suitable choice. For the government, the carbon tax contributes to the reduction of carbon emissions, but it also leads to the loss of the farmer’s profit. Additionally, numerical results further illustrate that, from the perspective of the government, transporting and inventory processes are two major sources of emissions, and it is essential to implement carbon tax and exploit low-carbon transportation.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2765agricultural productchannel selectioncarbon taxsustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cong Zheng
Quangui Pang
Tianpei Li
Guizheng Wang
Yiji Cai
Lei Yang
spellingShingle Cong Zheng
Quangui Pang
Tianpei Li
Guizheng Wang
Yiji Cai
Lei Yang
The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy
Sustainability
agricultural product
channel selection
carbon tax
sustainability
author_facet Cong Zheng
Quangui Pang
Tianpei Li
Guizheng Wang
Yiji Cai
Lei Yang
author_sort Cong Zheng
title The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy
title_short The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy
title_full The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy
title_fullStr The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy
title_full_unstemmed The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy
title_sort farmers’ channel selection and sustainable analysis under carbon tax policy
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-05-01
description This paper examines a farmer’s channel selection in a supply chain led by a retailer, considering carbon emissions and products’ deterioration. Three channels—online channels, retail channels, and dual channels—are proposed. The inventory model of perishable products and the two-stage Stackelberg game model are used to illustrate the operational process. To compare performances of the three channel structures, we further determine the critical points consisting of the profits and the carbon emissions among these channels. The results provide useful insights for supply chain members and the government. Farmers can choose a channel to optimize profit with respect to deterioration rate and product yield, but it might conflict with the aim of least carbon emissions. When the deterioration rate is high, the online channel is not a suitable choice. For the government, the carbon tax contributes to the reduction of carbon emissions, but it also leads to the loss of the farmer’s profit. Additionally, numerical results further illustrate that, from the perspective of the government, transporting and inventory processes are two major sources of emissions, and it is essential to implement carbon tax and exploit low-carbon transportation.
topic agricultural product
channel selection
carbon tax
sustainability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2765
work_keys_str_mv AT congzheng thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT quanguipang thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT tianpeili thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT guizhengwang thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT yijicai thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT leiyang thefarmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT congzheng farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT quanguipang farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT tianpeili farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT guizhengwang farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT yijicai farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
AT leiyang farmerschannelselectionandsustainableanalysisundercarbontaxpolicy
_version_ 1725087024587735040