Planning C2 pedicle screw placement with multiplanar reformatted cervical spine computed tomography

Object: Careful preoperative planning with thin-slice computed tomography (CT) scan is useful for hardware placement at C2. Prior studies have shown considerable variability in the proportion of C2 vertebrae considered safe for pedicle screw placement, depending on the imaging technique used. Our wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Casey T Davidson, Patrick F Bergin, Elliot T Varney, LaRita C Jones, Marion S Ward
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast=Davidson
id doaj-b243a39404f54931b1b4ffda5a8751ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b243a39404f54931b1b4ffda5a8751ea2020-11-25T00:50:03ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372019-01-01101465010.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_116_18Planning C2 pedicle screw placement with multiplanar reformatted cervical spine computed tomographyCasey T DavidsonPatrick F BerginElliot T VarneyLaRita C JonesMarion S WardObject: Careful preoperative planning with thin-slice computed tomography (CT) scan is useful for hardware placement at C2. Prior studies have shown considerable variability in the proportion of C2 vertebrae considered safe for pedicle screw placement, depending on the imaging technique used. Our work sought to more carefully define that proportion using a refined imaging technique on a large number of submillimeter CT scans. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 150 submillimeter cervical spine studies randomly selected from CT scans performed at a Level 1 trauma center. OsiriX™ image analysis software was used to propagate a 5-mm cylinder through the plane of the pedicle on paracoronal reformatted CT scans. Hounsfield unit attenuation was used to determine whether the cylinder violated the pedicle. Binomial data were generated to determine the proportion of pedicles that would allow safe screw placement. Results: We analyzed 300 pedicles in 150 patients. Using a standard C2 pedicle starting point, 32% of pedicles were breached by the 5-mm diameter cylinder. When screw trajectory was adjusted by moving the cylinder to fit the pedicle isthmus, establishing an optimized starting point, only 14% of pedicles were breached. Average pedicle length was 27.3 mm for screws that would have crossed the isthmus versus 13.2 mm for screws that would have stopped short due to potential breach. Conclusions: Findings of the current work suggest that preoperative imaging analysis or navigation can be useful adjuncts when anatomical variants are present.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast=DavidsonC2 pedicle screw placementpreoperative imaging analysissubmillimeter computed tomography scans
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Casey T Davidson
Patrick F Bergin
Elliot T Varney
LaRita C Jones
Marion S Ward
spellingShingle Casey T Davidson
Patrick F Bergin
Elliot T Varney
LaRita C Jones
Marion S Ward
Planning C2 pedicle screw placement with multiplanar reformatted cervical spine computed tomography
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
C2 pedicle screw placement
preoperative imaging analysis
submillimeter computed tomography scans
author_facet Casey T Davidson
Patrick F Bergin
Elliot T Varney
LaRita C Jones
Marion S Ward
author_sort Casey T Davidson
title Planning C2 pedicle screw placement with multiplanar reformatted cervical spine computed tomography
title_short Planning C2 pedicle screw placement with multiplanar reformatted cervical spine computed tomography
title_full Planning C2 pedicle screw placement with multiplanar reformatted cervical spine computed tomography
title_fullStr Planning C2 pedicle screw placement with multiplanar reformatted cervical spine computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Planning C2 pedicle screw placement with multiplanar reformatted cervical spine computed tomography
title_sort planning c2 pedicle screw placement with multiplanar reformatted cervical spine computed tomography
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
issn 0974-8237
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Object: Careful preoperative planning with thin-slice computed tomography (CT) scan is useful for hardware placement at C2. Prior studies have shown considerable variability in the proportion of C2 vertebrae considered safe for pedicle screw placement, depending on the imaging technique used. Our work sought to more carefully define that proportion using a refined imaging technique on a large number of submillimeter CT scans. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 150 submillimeter cervical spine studies randomly selected from CT scans performed at a Level 1 trauma center. OsiriX™ image analysis software was used to propagate a 5-mm cylinder through the plane of the pedicle on paracoronal reformatted CT scans. Hounsfield unit attenuation was used to determine whether the cylinder violated the pedicle. Binomial data were generated to determine the proportion of pedicles that would allow safe screw placement. Results: We analyzed 300 pedicles in 150 patients. Using a standard C2 pedicle starting point, 32% of pedicles were breached by the 5-mm diameter cylinder. When screw trajectory was adjusted by moving the cylinder to fit the pedicle isthmus, establishing an optimized starting point, only 14% of pedicles were breached. Average pedicle length was 27.3 mm for screws that would have crossed the isthmus versus 13.2 mm for screws that would have stopped short due to potential breach. Conclusions: Findings of the current work suggest that preoperative imaging analysis or navigation can be useful adjuncts when anatomical variants are present.
topic C2 pedicle screw placement
preoperative imaging analysis
submillimeter computed tomography scans
url http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast=Davidson
work_keys_str_mv AT caseytdavidson planningc2pediclescrewplacementwithmultiplanarreformattedcervicalspinecomputedtomography
AT patrickfbergin planningc2pediclescrewplacementwithmultiplanarreformattedcervicalspinecomputedtomography
AT elliottvarney planningc2pediclescrewplacementwithmultiplanarreformattedcervicalspinecomputedtomography
AT laritacjones planningc2pediclescrewplacementwithmultiplanarreformattedcervicalspinecomputedtomography
AT marionsward planningc2pediclescrewplacementwithmultiplanarreformattedcervicalspinecomputedtomography
_version_ 1725249588185530368