The morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes: A corpus-based analysis

The present analysis places the focus on the morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes, their use of irregular verbs, comparison of adjectives, and s-genitives, and so revisiting the findings of previous studies in light of the contribution of the frequencies for the two new Englishes in questi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JooHyuk Lim, Ariane Macalinga Borlongan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Letters, University of Santo Tomas 2013-10-01
Series:Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ajels.ust.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2-The-morphosyntax-of-Hong-Kong-and-Indian-Englishes-A-corpus-based-analysis.pdf
id doaj-b22fa3dc581c4e77bd25d8ad531f52ac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b22fa3dc581c4e77bd25d8ad531f52ac2020-11-25T03:00:35ZengDepartment of English, Faculty of Arts and Letters, University of Santo TomasAsian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS)2619-72192013-10-0112034The morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes: A corpus-based analysisJooHyuk Lim0Ariane Macalinga Borlongan1De La Salle University, Manila, the PhilippinesDe La Salle University, Manila, the PhilippinesThe present analysis places the focus on the morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes, their use of irregular verbs, comparison of adjectives, and s-genitives, and so revisiting the findings of previous studies in light of the contribution of the frequencies for the two new Englishes in question. Hong Kong and Indian Englishes generally follow the British pattern of irregularity, but it is Indian English that is more loyal to its colonial heritage as Hong Kong English has a tendency to demonstrate some ambivalence and indefiniteness in its patterns of verb morphology. As with all the other Englishes investigated in the studies of Hundt (1998) and Borlongan (2011b), Hong Kong and Indian Englishes also inflect for the comparison of adjectives. Periphrastic comparison though is more frequent – but not significantly frequent to put up a new pattern – in Hong Kong and Indian Englishes. The two Englishes also generate much higher frequencies of double comparatives as compared with Philippine and New Zealand Englishes. Hong Kong and Indian Englishes surface as the most conservative in the use of s-genitives. They are even more conservative than Philippine English, which has always been described as a considerably conservative variety of English.https://ajels.ust.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2-The-morphosyntax-of-Hong-Kong-and-Indian-Englishes-A-corpus-based-analysis.pdfasian englishesmorphosyntaxirregular verbscomparison of adjectivess-genitives
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author JooHyuk Lim
Ariane Macalinga Borlongan
spellingShingle JooHyuk Lim
Ariane Macalinga Borlongan
The morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes: A corpus-based analysis
Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS)
asian englishes
morphosyntax
irregular verbs
comparison of adjectives
s-genitives
author_facet JooHyuk Lim
Ariane Macalinga Borlongan
author_sort JooHyuk Lim
title The morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes: A corpus-based analysis
title_short The morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes: A corpus-based analysis
title_full The morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes: A corpus-based analysis
title_fullStr The morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes: A corpus-based analysis
title_full_unstemmed The morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes: A corpus-based analysis
title_sort morphosyntax of hong kong and indian englishes: a corpus-based analysis
publisher Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Letters, University of Santo Tomas
series Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS)
issn 2619-7219
publishDate 2013-10-01
description The present analysis places the focus on the morphosyntax of Hong Kong and Indian Englishes, their use of irregular verbs, comparison of adjectives, and s-genitives, and so revisiting the findings of previous studies in light of the contribution of the frequencies for the two new Englishes in question. Hong Kong and Indian Englishes generally follow the British pattern of irregularity, but it is Indian English that is more loyal to its colonial heritage as Hong Kong English has a tendency to demonstrate some ambivalence and indefiniteness in its patterns of verb morphology. As with all the other Englishes investigated in the studies of Hundt (1998) and Borlongan (2011b), Hong Kong and Indian Englishes also inflect for the comparison of adjectives. Periphrastic comparison though is more frequent – but not significantly frequent to put up a new pattern – in Hong Kong and Indian Englishes. The two Englishes also generate much higher frequencies of double comparatives as compared with Philippine and New Zealand Englishes. Hong Kong and Indian Englishes surface as the most conservative in the use of s-genitives. They are even more conservative than Philippine English, which has always been described as a considerably conservative variety of English.
topic asian englishes
morphosyntax
irregular verbs
comparison of adjectives
s-genitives
url https://ajels.ust.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2-The-morphosyntax-of-Hong-Kong-and-Indian-Englishes-A-corpus-based-analysis.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT joohyuklim themorphosyntaxofhongkongandindianenglishesacorpusbasedanalysis
AT arianemacalingaborlongan themorphosyntaxofhongkongandindianenglishesacorpusbasedanalysis
AT joohyuklim morphosyntaxofhongkongandindianenglishesacorpusbasedanalysis
AT arianemacalingaborlongan morphosyntaxofhongkongandindianenglishesacorpusbasedanalysis
_version_ 1724697247248023552