Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.

The attentional blink (AB) describes a time-based deficit in processing the second of two masked targets. The AB is attenuated if successive targets appear between the first and final target, or if a cueing target is positioned before the final target. Using various speeds of stimulus presentation,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannah L Pincham, Dénes Szűcs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3358257?pdf=render
id doaj-b210562138574387b80e49625a9466ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b210562138574387b80e49625a9466ee2020-11-25T01:20:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0175e3759610.1371/journal.pone.0037596Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.Hannah L PinchamDénes SzűcsThe attentional blink (AB) describes a time-based deficit in processing the second of two masked targets. The AB is attenuated if successive targets appear between the first and final target, or if a cueing target is positioned before the final target. Using various speeds of stimulus presentation, the current study employed successive targets and cueing targets to confirm and extend an understanding of target-target cueing in the AB. In Experiment 1, three targets were presented sequentially at rates of 30 msec/item or 90 msec/item. Successive targets presented at 90 msec improved performance compared with non-successive targets. However, accuracy was equivalently high for successive and non-successive targets presented at 30 msec/item, suggesting that--regardless of whether they occurred consecutively--those items fell within the temporally defined attentional window initiated by the first target. Using four different presentation speeds, Experiment 2 confirmed the time-based definition of the AB and the success of target-cueing at 30 msec/item. This experiment additionally revealed that cueing was most effective when resources were not devoted to the cue, thereby implicating capacity limitations in the AB. Across both experiments, a novel order-error measure suggested that errors tend to decrease with an increasing duration between the targets, but also revealed that certain stimulus conditions result in stable order accuracy. Overall, the results are best encapsulated by target-based and resource-sharing theories of the AB, which collectively value the contributions of capacity limitations and optimizing transient attention in time.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3358257?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hannah L Pincham
Dénes Szűcs
spellingShingle Hannah L Pincham
Dénes Szűcs
Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hannah L Pincham
Dénes Szűcs
author_sort Hannah L Pincham
title Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.
title_short Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.
title_full Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.
title_fullStr Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.
title_full_unstemmed Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.
title_sort target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The attentional blink (AB) describes a time-based deficit in processing the second of two masked targets. The AB is attenuated if successive targets appear between the first and final target, or if a cueing target is positioned before the final target. Using various speeds of stimulus presentation, the current study employed successive targets and cueing targets to confirm and extend an understanding of target-target cueing in the AB. In Experiment 1, three targets were presented sequentially at rates of 30 msec/item or 90 msec/item. Successive targets presented at 90 msec improved performance compared with non-successive targets. However, accuracy was equivalently high for successive and non-successive targets presented at 30 msec/item, suggesting that--regardless of whether they occurred consecutively--those items fell within the temporally defined attentional window initiated by the first target. Using four different presentation speeds, Experiment 2 confirmed the time-based definition of the AB and the success of target-cueing at 30 msec/item. This experiment additionally revealed that cueing was most effective when resources were not devoted to the cue, thereby implicating capacity limitations in the AB. Across both experiments, a novel order-error measure suggested that errors tend to decrease with an increasing duration between the targets, but also revealed that certain stimulus conditions result in stable order accuracy. Overall, the results are best encapsulated by target-based and resource-sharing theories of the AB, which collectively value the contributions of capacity limitations and optimizing transient attention in time.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3358257?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahlpincham targetcueingprovidessupportfortargetandresourcebasedmodelsoftheattentionalblink
AT denesszucs targetcueingprovidessupportfortargetandresourcebasedmodelsoftheattentionalblink
_version_ 1725135153837113344