Surveillance of Physicians Causing Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Ambulatory Care: A Pilot Study in Switzerland.

We analysed potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) in ambulatory care in Switzerland based on claims data from three large health insurers in 2010 to identify physicians with peculiar prescription behaviour differing from peers of the same specialty.We analysed contraindicated or potentially contrai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heiner C Bucher, Rita Achermann, Nadja Stohler, Christoph R Meier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4726757?pdf=render
id doaj-b201ff347be6412fa699879c0469542c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b201ff347be6412fa699879c0469542c2020-11-25T01:44:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014760610.1371/journal.pone.0147606Surveillance of Physicians Causing Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Ambulatory Care: A Pilot Study in Switzerland.Heiner C BucherRita AchermannNadja StohlerChristoph R MeierWe analysed potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) in ambulatory care in Switzerland based on claims data from three large health insurers in 2010 to identify physicians with peculiar prescription behaviour differing from peers of the same specialty.We analysed contraindicated or potentially contraindicated DDI from the national drug formulary and calculated for each physician the ratios of the number of patients with a potential DDI divided by the number of patients at risk and used a zero inflated binomial distribution to correct for the inflated number of observations with no DDI. We then calculated the probability that the number of caused potential DDI of physicians was unlikely (p-value < 0.05 and ≥ 0.01) and very unlikely (p-value <0.01) to be due to chance.Of 1'607'233 females and 1'525'307 males 1.3% and 1.2% were exposed to at least one potential DDI during 12 months. When analysing the 40 most common DDI, 598 and 416 of 18,297 physicians (3.3% and 2.3%) were causing potential DDI in a frequency unlikely (p<0.05 and p ≥ 0.01) and very unlikely (p<0.01) to be explained by chance. Patients cared by general practitioners and cardiologists had the lowest probability (0.20 and 0.26) for not being exposed to DDI.Contraindicated or potentially contraindicated DDI are frequent in ambulatory care in Switzerland, with a small proportion of physicians causing potential DDI in a frequency that is very unlikely to be explained by chance when compared to peers of the same specialty.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4726757?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heiner C Bucher
Rita Achermann
Nadja Stohler
Christoph R Meier
spellingShingle Heiner C Bucher
Rita Achermann
Nadja Stohler
Christoph R Meier
Surveillance of Physicians Causing Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Ambulatory Care: A Pilot Study in Switzerland.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Heiner C Bucher
Rita Achermann
Nadja Stohler
Christoph R Meier
author_sort Heiner C Bucher
title Surveillance of Physicians Causing Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Ambulatory Care: A Pilot Study in Switzerland.
title_short Surveillance of Physicians Causing Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Ambulatory Care: A Pilot Study in Switzerland.
title_full Surveillance of Physicians Causing Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Ambulatory Care: A Pilot Study in Switzerland.
title_fullStr Surveillance of Physicians Causing Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Ambulatory Care: A Pilot Study in Switzerland.
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance of Physicians Causing Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Ambulatory Care: A Pilot Study in Switzerland.
title_sort surveillance of physicians causing potential drug-drug interactions in ambulatory care: a pilot study in switzerland.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description We analysed potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) in ambulatory care in Switzerland based on claims data from three large health insurers in 2010 to identify physicians with peculiar prescription behaviour differing from peers of the same specialty.We analysed contraindicated or potentially contraindicated DDI from the national drug formulary and calculated for each physician the ratios of the number of patients with a potential DDI divided by the number of patients at risk and used a zero inflated binomial distribution to correct for the inflated number of observations with no DDI. We then calculated the probability that the number of caused potential DDI of physicians was unlikely (p-value < 0.05 and ≥ 0.01) and very unlikely (p-value <0.01) to be due to chance.Of 1'607'233 females and 1'525'307 males 1.3% and 1.2% were exposed to at least one potential DDI during 12 months. When analysing the 40 most common DDI, 598 and 416 of 18,297 physicians (3.3% and 2.3%) were causing potential DDI in a frequency unlikely (p<0.05 and p ≥ 0.01) and very unlikely (p<0.01) to be explained by chance. Patients cared by general practitioners and cardiologists had the lowest probability (0.20 and 0.26) for not being exposed to DDI.Contraindicated or potentially contraindicated DDI are frequent in ambulatory care in Switzerland, with a small proportion of physicians causing potential DDI in a frequency that is very unlikely to be explained by chance when compared to peers of the same specialty.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4726757?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT heinercbucher surveillanceofphysicianscausingpotentialdrugdruginteractionsinambulatorycareapilotstudyinswitzerland
AT ritaachermann surveillanceofphysicianscausingpotentialdrugdruginteractionsinambulatorycareapilotstudyinswitzerland
AT nadjastohler surveillanceofphysicianscausingpotentialdrugdruginteractionsinambulatorycareapilotstudyinswitzerland
AT christophrmeier surveillanceofphysicianscausingpotentialdrugdruginteractionsinambulatorycareapilotstudyinswitzerland
_version_ 1725026051414818816