The International Court of Justice and Brazil: a Necessary Reconciliation
In 1948, Brazil placed itself at the margin of the most important international tribunal of the moment by not adhering to the mandatory jurisdiction clause set out in Article 36-2 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The central objective of this work is to convince the Brazil...
Main Authors: | Juliette Robichez, André Lamartin Montes |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad del Rosario
2016-01-01
|
Series: | ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/acdi/article/view/4492 |
Similar Items
-
Una reflexión sobre el diferendo argentino uruguayo por la construcción en territorio uruguayo de dos papeleras sobre el río Uruguay
by: Héctor Gros Espiell
Published: (2007-08-01) -
Denying Competence in Contentious Proceedings Before the International Court of Justice
by: Juan José Quintana
Published: (2008-10-01) -
The International Court of Justice and third-party interrention in maritime disputes: An assessment to the decision on Costa Rica’s and Honduras requests for permission to intervene in the Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia)
by: Andrés Sarmiento Lamus
Published: (2012-12-01) -
La fragilidad de una jurisdicción universal complementaria de la justicia internacional penal: el reciente paradigma español
by: Carmen Vallejo Pena
Published: (2015-09-01) -
El asunto relativo al paso a través del Great Belt (Finlandia v. Dinamarca)
by: Fernando Pardo Segovia
Published: (2002-02-01)