Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT

Abstract Background Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart J. H. Biddle, Charlotte L. Edwardson, Trish Gorely, Emma G. Wilmot, Thomas Yates, Myra A. Nimmo, Kamlesh Khunti, Melanie J. Davies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-01-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3941-9
id doaj-b1ec0b6d3f494081868953ce6069bd63
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1ec0b6d3f494081868953ce6069bd632020-11-24T21:56:56ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582017-01-0117111110.1186/s12889-016-3941-9Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCTStuart J. H. Biddle0Charlotte L. Edwardson1Trish Gorely2Emma G. Wilmot3Thomas Yates4Myra A. Nimmo5Kamlesh Khunti6Melanie J. Davies7School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough UniversityLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustSchool of Sport, University of StirlingLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough UniversityLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustAbstract Background Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) behaviour in young adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes. Methods Data were collected from participants in the intervention group immediately after an educational workshop addressing sedentary time and diabetes risk (n = 71), through phone interviews 6 weeks (n = 45) after the workshop, and at the conclusion of the 12-month trial (n = 10). The two education session facilitators were also interviewed about the intervention. Results The RCT showed no difference in sedentary time at 12 months between intervention and control arms. The lack of behaviour change appeared not to be attributed to the workshops, which were well led and very favourably received according to feedback. However, factors contributing to this lack of behaviour change include lack of perceived health risk from baseline measures feedback; the preference to adopt physically active behaviours rather than to sit less; certain barriers to sitting less; motivational drift after the 3-month follow-up measurements where participants had no contact for a further 9 months; and, for some, unreliability of the self-monitoring tool. Conclusions The workshop was well led and well received by the attendees but future interventions need to consider more contact with participants, discuss any specific benefits around simply standing to reduce sitting time, address the barriers to sitting less, and provide a more user-friendly and reliable self-monitoring tool. Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN08434554 , MRC project 91409. Registered retrospectively on 22 February 2011.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3941-9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stuart J. H. Biddle
Charlotte L. Edwardson
Trish Gorely
Emma G. Wilmot
Thomas Yates
Myra A. Nimmo
Kamlesh Khunti
Melanie J. Davies
spellingShingle Stuart J. H. Biddle
Charlotte L. Edwardson
Trish Gorely
Emma G. Wilmot
Thomas Yates
Myra A. Nimmo
Kamlesh Khunti
Melanie J. Davies
Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
BMC Public Health
author_facet Stuart J. H. Biddle
Charlotte L. Edwardson
Trish Gorely
Emma G. Wilmot
Thomas Yates
Myra A. Nimmo
Kamlesh Khunti
Melanie J. Davies
author_sort Stuart J. H. Biddle
title Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_short Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_full Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_fullStr Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_full_unstemmed Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_sort reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the stand (sedentary time and diabetes) rct
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Abstract Background Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) behaviour in young adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes. Methods Data were collected from participants in the intervention group immediately after an educational workshop addressing sedentary time and diabetes risk (n = 71), through phone interviews 6 weeks (n = 45) after the workshop, and at the conclusion of the 12-month trial (n = 10). The two education session facilitators were also interviewed about the intervention. Results The RCT showed no difference in sedentary time at 12 months between intervention and control arms. The lack of behaviour change appeared not to be attributed to the workshops, which were well led and very favourably received according to feedback. However, factors contributing to this lack of behaviour change include lack of perceived health risk from baseline measures feedback; the preference to adopt physically active behaviours rather than to sit less; certain barriers to sitting less; motivational drift after the 3-month follow-up measurements where participants had no contact for a further 9 months; and, for some, unreliability of the self-monitoring tool. Conclusions The workshop was well led and well received by the attendees but future interventions need to consider more contact with participants, discuss any specific benefits around simply standing to reduce sitting time, address the barriers to sitting less, and provide a more user-friendly and reliable self-monitoring tool. Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN08434554 , MRC project 91409. Registered retrospectively on 22 February 2011.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3941-9
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartjhbiddle reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT charlotteledwardson reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT trishgorely reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT emmagwilmot reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT thomasyates reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT myraanimmo reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT kamleshkhunti reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT melaniejdavies reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
_version_ 1725856307684048896