Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
Abstract Background Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) b...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3941-9 |
id |
doaj-b1ec0b6d3f494081868953ce6069bd63 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b1ec0b6d3f494081868953ce6069bd632020-11-24T21:56:56ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582017-01-0117111110.1186/s12889-016-3941-9Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCTStuart J. H. Biddle0Charlotte L. Edwardson1Trish Gorely2Emma G. Wilmot3Thomas Yates4Myra A. Nimmo5Kamlesh Khunti6Melanie J. Davies7School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough UniversityLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustSchool of Sport, University of StirlingLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough UniversityLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustAbstract Background Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) behaviour in young adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes. Methods Data were collected from participants in the intervention group immediately after an educational workshop addressing sedentary time and diabetes risk (n = 71), through phone interviews 6 weeks (n = 45) after the workshop, and at the conclusion of the 12-month trial (n = 10). The two education session facilitators were also interviewed about the intervention. Results The RCT showed no difference in sedentary time at 12 months between intervention and control arms. The lack of behaviour change appeared not to be attributed to the workshops, which were well led and very favourably received according to feedback. However, factors contributing to this lack of behaviour change include lack of perceived health risk from baseline measures feedback; the preference to adopt physically active behaviours rather than to sit less; certain barriers to sitting less; motivational drift after the 3-month follow-up measurements where participants had no contact for a further 9 months; and, for some, unreliability of the self-monitoring tool. Conclusions The workshop was well led and well received by the attendees but future interventions need to consider more contact with participants, discuss any specific benefits around simply standing to reduce sitting time, address the barriers to sitting less, and provide a more user-friendly and reliable self-monitoring tool. Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN08434554 , MRC project 91409. Registered retrospectively on 22 February 2011.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3941-9 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stuart J. H. Biddle Charlotte L. Edwardson Trish Gorely Emma G. Wilmot Thomas Yates Myra A. Nimmo Kamlesh Khunti Melanie J. Davies |
spellingShingle |
Stuart J. H. Biddle Charlotte L. Edwardson Trish Gorely Emma G. Wilmot Thomas Yates Myra A. Nimmo Kamlesh Khunti Melanie J. Davies Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT BMC Public Health |
author_facet |
Stuart J. H. Biddle Charlotte L. Edwardson Trish Gorely Emma G. Wilmot Thomas Yates Myra A. Nimmo Kamlesh Khunti Melanie J. Davies |
author_sort |
Stuart J. H. Biddle |
title |
Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT |
title_short |
Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT |
title_full |
Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT |
title_fullStr |
Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT |
title_sort |
reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the stand (sedentary time and diabetes) rct |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) behaviour in young adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes. Methods Data were collected from participants in the intervention group immediately after an educational workshop addressing sedentary time and diabetes risk (n = 71), through phone interviews 6 weeks (n = 45) after the workshop, and at the conclusion of the 12-month trial (n = 10). The two education session facilitators were also interviewed about the intervention. Results The RCT showed no difference in sedentary time at 12 months between intervention and control arms. The lack of behaviour change appeared not to be attributed to the workshops, which were well led and very favourably received according to feedback. However, factors contributing to this lack of behaviour change include lack of perceived health risk from baseline measures feedback; the preference to adopt physically active behaviours rather than to sit less; certain barriers to sitting less; motivational drift after the 3-month follow-up measurements where participants had no contact for a further 9 months; and, for some, unreliability of the self-monitoring tool. Conclusions The workshop was well led and well received by the attendees but future interventions need to consider more contact with participants, discuss any specific benefits around simply standing to reduce sitting time, address the barriers to sitting less, and provide a more user-friendly and reliable self-monitoring tool. Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN08434554 , MRC project 91409. Registered retrospectively on 22 February 2011. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3941-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stuartjhbiddle reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct AT charlotteledwardson reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct AT trishgorely reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct AT emmagwilmot reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct AT thomasyates reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct AT myraanimmo reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct AT kamleshkhunti reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct AT melaniejdavies reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct |
_version_ |
1725856307684048896 |