Performance Comparison between Fountain Codes-Based Secure MIMO Protocols with and without Using Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access
In this paper, we propose and evaluate the performance of fountain codes (FCs) based secure transmission protocols in multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) wireless systems, in presence of a passive eavesdropper. In the proposed protocols, a source selects its best antenna to transmit fountain encod...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Entropy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/10/982 |
id |
doaj-b1e51b1759664401b1eaacae2f9bb0c9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b1e51b1759664401b1eaacae2f9bb0c92020-11-25T02:53:58ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002019-10-01211098210.3390/e21100982e21100982Performance Comparison between Fountain Codes-Based Secure MIMO Protocols with and without Using Non-Orthogonal Multiple AccessDang The Hung0Tran Trung Duy1Phuong T. Tran2Do Quoc Trinh3Tan Hanh4Faculty of Radio-Electronics Engineering, Le Quy Don Technical University, Ha Noi 100000, VietnamDepartment of Telecommunications, and Department of Information Technology, Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, VietnamWireless Communications Research Group, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, VietnamFaculty of Radio-Electronics Engineering, Le Quy Don Technical University, Ha Noi 100000, VietnamDepartment of Telecommunications, and Department of Information Technology, Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, VietnamIn this paper, we propose and evaluate the performance of fountain codes (FCs) based secure transmission protocols in multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) wireless systems, in presence of a passive eavesdropper. In the proposed protocols, a source selects its best antenna to transmit fountain encoded packets to a destination that employs selection combining (SC) or maximal ratio combing (MRC) to enhance reliability of the decoding. The transmission is terminated when the destination has a required number of the encoded packets to reconstruct the original data of the source. Similarly, the eavesdropper also has the ability to recover the source data if it can intercept a sufficient number of the encoded packets. To reduce the number of time slots used, the source can employ non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) to send two encoded packets to the destination at each time slot. For performance analysis, exact formulas of average number of time slots (TS) and intercept probability (IP) over Rayleigh fading channel are derived and then verified by Monte-Carlo simulations. The results presented that the protocol using NOMA not only reduces TS but also obtains lower IP at medium and high transmit signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), as compared with the corresponding protocol without using NOMA.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/10/982physical-layer securityfountain codesnon-orthogonal multiple accessintercept probability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dang The Hung Tran Trung Duy Phuong T. Tran Do Quoc Trinh Tan Hanh |
spellingShingle |
Dang The Hung Tran Trung Duy Phuong T. Tran Do Quoc Trinh Tan Hanh Performance Comparison between Fountain Codes-Based Secure MIMO Protocols with and without Using Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Entropy physical-layer security fountain codes non-orthogonal multiple access intercept probability |
author_facet |
Dang The Hung Tran Trung Duy Phuong T. Tran Do Quoc Trinh Tan Hanh |
author_sort |
Dang The Hung |
title |
Performance Comparison between Fountain Codes-Based Secure MIMO Protocols with and without Using Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access |
title_short |
Performance Comparison between Fountain Codes-Based Secure MIMO Protocols with and without Using Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access |
title_full |
Performance Comparison between Fountain Codes-Based Secure MIMO Protocols with and without Using Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access |
title_fullStr |
Performance Comparison between Fountain Codes-Based Secure MIMO Protocols with and without Using Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance Comparison between Fountain Codes-Based Secure MIMO Protocols with and without Using Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access |
title_sort |
performance comparison between fountain codes-based secure mimo protocols with and without using non-orthogonal multiple access |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Entropy |
issn |
1099-4300 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
In this paper, we propose and evaluate the performance of fountain codes (FCs) based secure transmission protocols in multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) wireless systems, in presence of a passive eavesdropper. In the proposed protocols, a source selects its best antenna to transmit fountain encoded packets to a destination that employs selection combining (SC) or maximal ratio combing (MRC) to enhance reliability of the decoding. The transmission is terminated when the destination has a required number of the encoded packets to reconstruct the original data of the source. Similarly, the eavesdropper also has the ability to recover the source data if it can intercept a sufficient number of the encoded packets. To reduce the number of time slots used, the source can employ non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) to send two encoded packets to the destination at each time slot. For performance analysis, exact formulas of average number of time slots (TS) and intercept probability (IP) over Rayleigh fading channel are derived and then verified by Monte-Carlo simulations. The results presented that the protocol using NOMA not only reduces TS but also obtains lower IP at medium and high transmit signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), as compared with the corresponding protocol without using NOMA. |
topic |
physical-layer security fountain codes non-orthogonal multiple access intercept probability |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/10/982 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dangthehung performancecomparisonbetweenfountaincodesbasedsecuremimoprotocolswithandwithoutusingnonorthogonalmultipleaccess AT trantrungduy performancecomparisonbetweenfountaincodesbasedsecuremimoprotocolswithandwithoutusingnonorthogonalmultipleaccess AT phuongttran performancecomparisonbetweenfountaincodesbasedsecuremimoprotocolswithandwithoutusingnonorthogonalmultipleaccess AT doquoctrinh performancecomparisonbetweenfountaincodesbasedsecuremimoprotocolswithandwithoutusingnonorthogonalmultipleaccess AT tanhanh performancecomparisonbetweenfountaincodesbasedsecuremimoprotocolswithandwithoutusingnonorthogonalmultipleaccess |
_version_ |
1724723305978527744 |