Listening to Different Texts: Between Reich and Eco with Nycz

In this essay, the author considers intertextuality in contemporary musical work, conceptualizing it not only as a critical category and as an artistic convention, but also as an aesthetic strategy. Listening for texts, as it were, opens the work for influences and gives it new purposes. The multipl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Małgorzata A. Szyszkowska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Warsaw 2019-10-01
Series:Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/listening-to-different-texts-between-reich-and-eco-with-nycz/
id doaj-b1d583ae25a240ba9ff06aec21616aa0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1d583ae25a240ba9ff06aec21616aa02021-01-02T06:01:41ZengUniversity of WarsawEidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture2544-302X2544-302X2019-10-013351310.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0027Listening to Different Texts: Between Reich and Eco with NyczMałgorzata A. Szyszkowska0Fryderyk Chopin University of Music, WarsawIn this essay, the author considers intertextuality in contemporary musical work, conceptualizing it not only as a critical category and as an artistic convention, but also as an aesthetic strategy. Listening for texts, as it were, opens the work for influences and gives it new purposes. The multiple texts, which are mutually interdependent, alter each other’s meaning and are “read” and “re-read” during aesthetic experience. Depending on the listener, these meanings are more or less pronounced; some are seen as primary, while others are seen as secondary. Sometimes they are co-dependent and meaningful together, but sometimes they shy each other out. The multilayered quality of the work is acknowledged and seen as important even before individual meanings can be discovered. The author proposes a look at intertextuality in reference to musical works by Steve Reich, (e.g. Different trains, 1988). The author uses Ryszard Nycz’s definition of intertextuality and confronts it with Umberto Eco’s idea of interpretation and the structural openness of art. Putting forward a concept of listening-in as a necessary element of receiving and understanding certain musical works, she suggests accepting an intertextual aesthetic strategy for a satisfactory aesthetic experience. Assuming the presence of multiple texts, which are different in character and meaning, and accepting their interdependence, changes the reception of the work and colors its qualities. The challenge is not only to seek out different texts hidden behind the purely musical face of the work but to find out the way they influence each other, knowing full well that the major or minor role those texts play depend on the listener as much as on the author.http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/listening-to-different-texts-between-reich-and-eco-with-nycz/intertextualitymultilayerednesshermeneuticsminimal musiclistening-in
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Małgorzata A. Szyszkowska
spellingShingle Małgorzata A. Szyszkowska
Listening to Different Texts: Between Reich and Eco with Nycz
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
intertextuality
multilayeredness
hermeneutics
minimal music
listening-in
author_facet Małgorzata A. Szyszkowska
author_sort Małgorzata A. Szyszkowska
title Listening to Different Texts: Between Reich and Eco with Nycz
title_short Listening to Different Texts: Between Reich and Eco with Nycz
title_full Listening to Different Texts: Between Reich and Eco with Nycz
title_fullStr Listening to Different Texts: Between Reich and Eco with Nycz
title_full_unstemmed Listening to Different Texts: Between Reich and Eco with Nycz
title_sort listening to different texts: between reich and eco with nycz
publisher University of Warsaw
series Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
issn 2544-302X
2544-302X
publishDate 2019-10-01
description In this essay, the author considers intertextuality in contemporary musical work, conceptualizing it not only as a critical category and as an artistic convention, but also as an aesthetic strategy. Listening for texts, as it were, opens the work for influences and gives it new purposes. The multiple texts, which are mutually interdependent, alter each other’s meaning and are “read” and “re-read” during aesthetic experience. Depending on the listener, these meanings are more or less pronounced; some are seen as primary, while others are seen as secondary. Sometimes they are co-dependent and meaningful together, but sometimes they shy each other out. The multilayered quality of the work is acknowledged and seen as important even before individual meanings can be discovered. The author proposes a look at intertextuality in reference to musical works by Steve Reich, (e.g. Different trains, 1988). The author uses Ryszard Nycz’s definition of intertextuality and confronts it with Umberto Eco’s idea of interpretation and the structural openness of art. Putting forward a concept of listening-in as a necessary element of receiving and understanding certain musical works, she suggests accepting an intertextual aesthetic strategy for a satisfactory aesthetic experience. Assuming the presence of multiple texts, which are different in character and meaning, and accepting their interdependence, changes the reception of the work and colors its qualities. The challenge is not only to seek out different texts hidden behind the purely musical face of the work but to find out the way they influence each other, knowing full well that the major or minor role those texts play depend on the listener as much as on the author.
topic intertextuality
multilayeredness
hermeneutics
minimal music
listening-in
url http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/listening-to-different-texts-between-reich-and-eco-with-nycz/
work_keys_str_mv AT małgorzataaszyszkowska listeningtodifferenttextsbetweenreichandecowithnycz
_version_ 1724358560721141760