Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?

The concept of multiple scaling regimes in temperature time series is examined, with emphasis on the question whether or not a monoscaling model with one single scaling regime can be rejected from observation data from the Holocene. A model for internal variability with only one regime is simpler an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Nilsen, K. Rypdal, H.-B. Fredriksen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-04-01
Series:Earth System Dynamics
Online Access:http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/7/419/2016/esd-7-419-2016.pdf
id doaj-b1caa8bc6f8843b996dfb76346de223b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1caa8bc6f8843b996dfb76346de223b2020-11-24T23:34:09ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth System Dynamics2190-49792190-49872016-04-017241943910.5194/esd-7-419-2016Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?T. Nilsen0K. Rypdal1H.-B. Fredriksen2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NorwayDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NorwayDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NorwayThe concept of multiple scaling regimes in temperature time series is examined, with emphasis on the question whether or not a monoscaling model with one single scaling regime can be rejected from observation data from the Holocene. A model for internal variability with only one regime is simpler and allows more certain predictions on timescales of centuries when combined with existing knowledge of radiative forcing. Our analysis of spectra from stable isotope ratios from Greenland and Antarctica ice cores shows that a scale break around centennial timescales is evident for the last glacial period, but not for the Holocene. Spectra from a number of late Holocene multiproxy temperature reconstructions, and one from the entire Holocene, have also been analysed, without identifying a significant scale break. Our results indicate that a single-regime scaling climate noise, with some non-scaling fluctuations on a millennial timescale superposed, cannot be rejected as a null model for the Holocene climate. The scale break observed from the glacial time ice-core records is likely caused by the influence of Dansgaard–Oeschger events and teleconnections to the Southern Hemisphere on centennial timescales. From our analysis we conclude that the two-regime model is not sufficiently justified for the Holocene to be used for temperature prediction on centennial timescales.http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/7/419/2016/esd-7-419-2016.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. Nilsen
K. Rypdal
H.-B. Fredriksen
spellingShingle T. Nilsen
K. Rypdal
H.-B. Fredriksen
Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
Earth System Dynamics
author_facet T. Nilsen
K. Rypdal
H.-B. Fredriksen
author_sort T. Nilsen
title Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_short Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_full Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_fullStr Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_full_unstemmed Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_sort are there multiple scaling regimes in holocene temperature records?
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Earth System Dynamics
issn 2190-4979
2190-4987
publishDate 2016-04-01
description The concept of multiple scaling regimes in temperature time series is examined, with emphasis on the question whether or not a monoscaling model with one single scaling regime can be rejected from observation data from the Holocene. A model for internal variability with only one regime is simpler and allows more certain predictions on timescales of centuries when combined with existing knowledge of radiative forcing. Our analysis of spectra from stable isotope ratios from Greenland and Antarctica ice cores shows that a scale break around centennial timescales is evident for the last glacial period, but not for the Holocene. Spectra from a number of late Holocene multiproxy temperature reconstructions, and one from the entire Holocene, have also been analysed, without identifying a significant scale break. Our results indicate that a single-regime scaling climate noise, with some non-scaling fluctuations on a millennial timescale superposed, cannot be rejected as a null model for the Holocene climate. The scale break observed from the glacial time ice-core records is likely caused by the influence of Dansgaard–Oeschger events and teleconnections to the Southern Hemisphere on centennial timescales. From our analysis we conclude that the two-regime model is not sufficiently justified for the Holocene to be used for temperature prediction on centennial timescales.
url http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/7/419/2016/esd-7-419-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tnilsen aretheremultiplescalingregimesinholocenetemperaturerecords
AT krypdal aretheremultiplescalingregimesinholocenetemperaturerecords
AT hbfredriksen aretheremultiplescalingregimesinholocenetemperaturerecords
_version_ 1725529429762899968