Statistical expertise in the Ecuadorian public administration: Emergence and legitimation mechanisms

Statistics are an essential tool for governance in contemporary public administration. The advent of this discipline in Ecuador hinged on the role played by a field of experts that appeared and achieved legitimacy in the period running between 1927 and 2020. The present text asks about the role of i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Byron Villacís
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador 2021-09-01
Series:Íconos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/iconos/article/view/4841
id doaj-b1c805072fd9493f868afdc9610e9efc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1c805072fd9493f868afdc9610e9efc2021-09-01T17:09:32ZspaFacultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede EcuadorÍconos 1390-12492224-69832021-09-0125718110210.17141/iconos.71.2021.4841Statistical expertise in the Ecuadorian public administration: Emergence and legitimation mechanismsByron Villacís0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6932-3770Universidad de California en Berkeley Statistics are an essential tool for governance in contemporary public administration. The advent of this discipline in Ecuador hinged on the role played by a field of experts that appeared and achieved legitimacy in the period running between 1927 and 2020. The present text asks about the role of internal and external factors as well as that of sociopolitical causes, in bringing about the development of statistics as a discipline in this country. The examination of historical archives and the completion of in-depth interviews discloses the fact that the advancement of the field of public statistics in Ecuador is the outcome of the joint impact of four centripetal external forces and three centrifugal local factors. The legacy of the Kemmerer mission, the influence of CEPAL, the growing automatization of Government and the international demand for adequate reporting, created powerful incentives for the growth of the profession. These trends were reinforced by local government styles, frequent institutional redesign and recurrent redefinitions of organizational mandates. Initially, academia played an inconsistent and fragmented role in the production of expert statisticians. However, the increasing strength of government regulation and planning helped the profession to achieve institutional and disciplinary stability. This text provides useful insights for efforts that attempt to show that statistics are not objective and isolated devices, but instead are the result of social relations that need to be approached from a historical perspective.https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/iconos/article/view/4841public statisticslegitimacysociology of statisticsoccupational sociologysociology of knowledgefield theory
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Byron Villacís
spellingShingle Byron Villacís
Statistical expertise in the Ecuadorian public administration: Emergence and legitimation mechanisms
Íconos
public statistics
legitimacy
sociology of statistics
occupational sociology
sociology of knowledge
field theory
author_facet Byron Villacís
author_sort Byron Villacís
title Statistical expertise in the Ecuadorian public administration: Emergence and legitimation mechanisms
title_short Statistical expertise in the Ecuadorian public administration: Emergence and legitimation mechanisms
title_full Statistical expertise in the Ecuadorian public administration: Emergence and legitimation mechanisms
title_fullStr Statistical expertise in the Ecuadorian public administration: Emergence and legitimation mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Statistical expertise in the Ecuadorian public administration: Emergence and legitimation mechanisms
title_sort statistical expertise in the ecuadorian public administration: emergence and legitimation mechanisms
publisher Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador
series Íconos
issn 1390-1249
2224-6983
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Statistics are an essential tool for governance in contemporary public administration. The advent of this discipline in Ecuador hinged on the role played by a field of experts that appeared and achieved legitimacy in the period running between 1927 and 2020. The present text asks about the role of internal and external factors as well as that of sociopolitical causes, in bringing about the development of statistics as a discipline in this country. The examination of historical archives and the completion of in-depth interviews discloses the fact that the advancement of the field of public statistics in Ecuador is the outcome of the joint impact of four centripetal external forces and three centrifugal local factors. The legacy of the Kemmerer mission, the influence of CEPAL, the growing automatization of Government and the international demand for adequate reporting, created powerful incentives for the growth of the profession. These trends were reinforced by local government styles, frequent institutional redesign and recurrent redefinitions of organizational mandates. Initially, academia played an inconsistent and fragmented role in the production of expert statisticians. However, the increasing strength of government regulation and planning helped the profession to achieve institutional and disciplinary stability. This text provides useful insights for efforts that attempt to show that statistics are not objective and isolated devices, but instead are the result of social relations that need to be approached from a historical perspective.
topic public statistics
legitimacy
sociology of statistics
occupational sociology
sociology of knowledge
field theory
url https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/iconos/article/view/4841
work_keys_str_mv AT byronvillacis statisticalexpertiseintheecuadorianpublicadministrationemergenceandlegitimationmechanisms
_version_ 1721182369277280256