Optimization of the Pricing Strategies between Container Terminals under Deregulation

According to the dual-track system implemented on port tariffs in past years, the vast majority of state-owned container terminals adopt the standard rates specified by China’s Ministry of Transport, while the container terminals of joint ventures are permitted to charge their stevedoring rate with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gang Dong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1626429
id doaj-b1c4b46baa994e9dafad7a9c531def86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1c4b46baa994e9dafad7a9c531def862020-11-25T00:26:20ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472018-01-01201810.1155/2018/16264291626429Optimization of the Pricing Strategies between Container Terminals under DeregulationGang Dong0School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, ChinaAccording to the dual-track system implemented on port tariffs in past years, the vast majority of state-owned container terminals adopt the standard rates specified by China’s Ministry of Transport, while the container terminals of joint ventures are permitted to charge their stevedoring rate with a 20% float ratio up and down. The latest port reform was to improve the port tariff formation mechanism by speeding up the implementation of detailed list and public notice on port pricing. This paper analyses the optimization of the pricing strategies between container terminals under deregulation. Based on a two-stage noncooperative game theoretical model, the Nash equilibria of pricing strategy profiles between container terminals of one port under deregulation are derived. Although the price-matching strategy may be employed by the foreign-owned container terminal, which usually resulting in a total social welfare loss, the price-matching pricing strategy not being adopted by the state-owned container terminal will avert tacit collusion. Numerical simulation is applied to the case of Shenzhen Port.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1626429
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gang Dong
spellingShingle Gang Dong
Optimization of the Pricing Strategies between Container Terminals under Deregulation
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Gang Dong
author_sort Gang Dong
title Optimization of the Pricing Strategies between Container Terminals under Deregulation
title_short Optimization of the Pricing Strategies between Container Terminals under Deregulation
title_full Optimization of the Pricing Strategies between Container Terminals under Deregulation
title_fullStr Optimization of the Pricing Strategies between Container Terminals under Deregulation
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of the Pricing Strategies between Container Terminals under Deregulation
title_sort optimization of the pricing strategies between container terminals under deregulation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2018-01-01
description According to the dual-track system implemented on port tariffs in past years, the vast majority of state-owned container terminals adopt the standard rates specified by China’s Ministry of Transport, while the container terminals of joint ventures are permitted to charge their stevedoring rate with a 20% float ratio up and down. The latest port reform was to improve the port tariff formation mechanism by speeding up the implementation of detailed list and public notice on port pricing. This paper analyses the optimization of the pricing strategies between container terminals under deregulation. Based on a two-stage noncooperative game theoretical model, the Nash equilibria of pricing strategy profiles between container terminals of one port under deregulation are derived. Although the price-matching strategy may be employed by the foreign-owned container terminal, which usually resulting in a total social welfare loss, the price-matching pricing strategy not being adopted by the state-owned container terminal will avert tacit collusion. Numerical simulation is applied to the case of Shenzhen Port.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1626429
work_keys_str_mv AT gangdong optimizationofthepricingstrategiesbetweencontainerterminalsunderderegulation
_version_ 1725344566687563776