Stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC – the conception comparison
The paper presents the research results of a few different conception of stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC system. The most attention is focused on the comparison between two topologies of the ESS: energy storage system with supercapacitor and with supercapacitor and LFP battery. The var...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2018-01-01
|
Series: | MATEC Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818002013 |
id |
doaj-b1c0cd9905c84c66aa1f6f497b229e65 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b1c0cd9905c84c66aa1f6f497b229e652021-04-02T10:01:52ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011800201310.1051/matecconf/201818002013matecconf_met2018_02013Stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC – the conception comparisonJefimowski WłodzimierzThe paper presents the research results of a few different conception of stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC system. The most attention is focused on the comparison between two topologies of the ESS: energy storage system with supercapacitor and with supercapacitor and LFP battery. The variants are compared in terms of energy saving and peak power demand reduction. The implementation of ESS with SC results the decrease of active energy drawn from traction substation. Meanwhile the implementation of ESS with SC and LFP battery leads to achieving of two aims - decreasing of active energy consumption by maximization of regenerative energy utilization and reduction of 15 - min. peak power demand of traction substation.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818002013 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jefimowski Włodzimierz |
spellingShingle |
Jefimowski Włodzimierz Stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC – the conception comparison MATEC Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Jefimowski Włodzimierz |
author_sort |
Jefimowski Włodzimierz |
title |
Stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC – the conception comparison |
title_short |
Stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC – the conception comparison |
title_full |
Stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC – the conception comparison |
title_fullStr |
Stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC – the conception comparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC – the conception comparison |
title_sort |
stationary energy storage system in a 3 kv dc – the conception comparison |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
MATEC Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-236X |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
The paper presents the research results of a few different conception of stationary energy storage system in a 3 kV DC system. The most attention is focused on the comparison between two topologies of the ESS: energy storage system with supercapacitor and with supercapacitor and LFP battery. The variants are compared in terms of energy saving and peak power demand reduction. The implementation of ESS with SC results the decrease of active energy drawn from traction substation. Meanwhile the implementation of ESS with SC and LFP battery leads to achieving of two aims - decreasing of active energy consumption by maximization of regenerative energy utilization and reduction of 15 - min. peak power demand of traction substation. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818002013 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jefimowskiwłodzimierz stationaryenergystoragesystemina3kvdctheconceptioncomparison |
_version_ |
1724168116078903296 |