Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model
Abstract Background Bleeding during cardiac surgery is a common complication that often requires the transfusion of blood products. The combination of bleeding and blood product transfusion incrementally increases adverse outcomes including infection and mortality. Following bleeding management guid...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06269-8 |
id |
doaj-b1b954427aa644fb86f708def4881541 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b1b954427aa644fb86f708def48815412021-06-06T11:10:05ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-06-0121111610.1186/s12913-021-06269-8Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B modelBronwyn L. Pearse0Samantha Keogh1Claire M. Rickard2Yoke L. Fung3School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith UniversitySchool of Nursing and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of TechnologySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith UniversitySchool of Health & Sports Sciences, University of Sunshine CoastAbstract Background Bleeding during cardiac surgery is a common complication that often requires the transfusion of blood products. The combination of bleeding and blood product transfusion incrementally increases adverse outcomes including infection and mortality. Following bleeding management guideline recommendations could assist with minimising risk but adherence is not high, and the cause for lack of adherence is not well understood. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to practicing and implementing evidenced-based intra-operative, bleeding management in Australian cardiac surgery units. Methods We used a qualitative descriptive design to conduct semi-structured interviews with Australian cardiac surgeons, anaesthetists and perfusionists. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was utilised to guide interviews and thematically analyse the data. Categorised data were then linked with the three key domains of the COM-B model (capability, opportunity, motivation - behaviour) to explore and understand behaviour. Results Seventeen interviews were completed. Nine of the 14 TDF domains emerged as significant. Analysis revealed key themes to improving capability included, standardisation, monitoring, auditing and feedback of data and cross discipline training. Opportunity for change was improved with interpersonal and interdepartmental collaboration through shared goals, and more efficient and supportive processes allowing clinicians to navigate unfamiliar business and financial models of health care. Results suggest as individuals, clinicians had the motivation to make change and healthcare organisations have an obligation and a responsibility to partner with clinicians to support change and improve goal directed best practice. Conclusion Using a theory-based approach it was possible to identify factors which may be positively or negatively influence clinicians ability to implement best practice bleeding management in Australian cardiac surgical units.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06269-8Cardiac surgeryAustraliaBleedingBarriersFacilitatorsTheoretical domains framework |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bronwyn L. Pearse Samantha Keogh Claire M. Rickard Yoke L. Fung |
spellingShingle |
Bronwyn L. Pearse Samantha Keogh Claire M. Rickard Yoke L. Fung Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model BMC Health Services Research Cardiac surgery Australia Bleeding Barriers Facilitators Theoretical domains framework |
author_facet |
Bronwyn L. Pearse Samantha Keogh Claire M. Rickard Yoke L. Fung |
author_sort |
Bronwyn L. Pearse |
title |
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model |
title_short |
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model |
title_full |
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model |
title_fullStr |
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model |
title_sort |
barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in australian cardiac surgery units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and com-b model |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Bleeding during cardiac surgery is a common complication that often requires the transfusion of blood products. The combination of bleeding and blood product transfusion incrementally increases adverse outcomes including infection and mortality. Following bleeding management guideline recommendations could assist with minimising risk but adherence is not high, and the cause for lack of adherence is not well understood. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to practicing and implementing evidenced-based intra-operative, bleeding management in Australian cardiac surgery units. Methods We used a qualitative descriptive design to conduct semi-structured interviews with Australian cardiac surgeons, anaesthetists and perfusionists. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was utilised to guide interviews and thematically analyse the data. Categorised data were then linked with the three key domains of the COM-B model (capability, opportunity, motivation - behaviour) to explore and understand behaviour. Results Seventeen interviews were completed. Nine of the 14 TDF domains emerged as significant. Analysis revealed key themes to improving capability included, standardisation, monitoring, auditing and feedback of data and cross discipline training. Opportunity for change was improved with interpersonal and interdepartmental collaboration through shared goals, and more efficient and supportive processes allowing clinicians to navigate unfamiliar business and financial models of health care. Results suggest as individuals, clinicians had the motivation to make change and healthcare organisations have an obligation and a responsibility to partner with clinicians to support change and improve goal directed best practice. Conclusion Using a theory-based approach it was possible to identify factors which may be positively or negatively influence clinicians ability to implement best practice bleeding management in Australian cardiac surgical units. |
topic |
Cardiac surgery Australia Bleeding Barriers Facilitators Theoretical domains framework |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06269-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bronwynlpearse barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingevidencebasedbleedingmanagementinaustraliancardiacsurgeryunitsaqualitativeinterviewstudyanalysedwiththetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandcombmodel AT samanthakeogh barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingevidencebasedbleedingmanagementinaustraliancardiacsurgeryunitsaqualitativeinterviewstudyanalysedwiththetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandcombmodel AT clairemrickard barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingevidencebasedbleedingmanagementinaustraliancardiacsurgeryunitsaqualitativeinterviewstudyanalysedwiththetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandcombmodel AT yokelfung barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingevidencebasedbleedingmanagementinaustraliancardiacsurgeryunitsaqualitativeinterviewstudyanalysedwiththetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandcombmodel |
_version_ |
1721394333908729856 |