Holding water with capacity to target porosity
Abstract Optimizing soil microbial activity requires an equal balance between water‐ and air‐filled porosity, that is, 50% water‐filled pore space (WFPS). However, many soil biological investigations report water as some fraction of water‐holding capacity (WHC). This study was conducted to fill a qu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Agricultural & Environmental Letters |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20029 |
id |
doaj-b1aa19d506b64f6985f50a3cedad6e92 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b1aa19d506b64f6985f50a3cedad6e922021-02-05T06:02:45ZengWileyAgricultural & Environmental Letters2471-96252020-01-0151n/an/a10.1002/ael2.20029Holding water with capacity to target porosityAlan J. Franzluebbers0USDA Agricultural Research Service 101 Derieux Pl. Raleigh NC 27695 USAAbstract Optimizing soil microbial activity requires an equal balance between water‐ and air‐filled porosity, that is, 50% water‐filled pore space (WFPS). However, many soil biological investigations report water as some fraction of water‐holding capacity (WHC). This study was conducted to fill a quantitative gap between WFPS and WHC. Soil samples (n = 198) from 10 eastern U.S. states and one state in Brazil provided a wide distribution of clay (0.064–0.487 kg kg−1) and soil organic C (SOC, 5.2–52.0 g kg−1) concentrations (5–95% range). Gravimetric soil water content (SWC) was determined at WHC and at saturation. Both clay and SOC concentrations strongly influenced SWC; the effect of SOC was strongest and nonlinear. To achieve 50% WFPS, gravimetric SWC was 0.69 ± 0.10 times that of WHC and 0.59 ± 0.03 times that of saturation. For soil biological assays, 50% WFPS could be accurately and simply achieved with calculations using gravimetric SWC at saturation multiplied by 0.59.https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20029 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alan J. Franzluebbers |
spellingShingle |
Alan J. Franzluebbers Holding water with capacity to target porosity Agricultural & Environmental Letters |
author_facet |
Alan J. Franzluebbers |
author_sort |
Alan J. Franzluebbers |
title |
Holding water with capacity to target porosity |
title_short |
Holding water with capacity to target porosity |
title_full |
Holding water with capacity to target porosity |
title_fullStr |
Holding water with capacity to target porosity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Holding water with capacity to target porosity |
title_sort |
holding water with capacity to target porosity |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Agricultural & Environmental Letters |
issn |
2471-9625 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Optimizing soil microbial activity requires an equal balance between water‐ and air‐filled porosity, that is, 50% water‐filled pore space (WFPS). However, many soil biological investigations report water as some fraction of water‐holding capacity (WHC). This study was conducted to fill a quantitative gap between WFPS and WHC. Soil samples (n = 198) from 10 eastern U.S. states and one state in Brazil provided a wide distribution of clay (0.064–0.487 kg kg−1) and soil organic C (SOC, 5.2–52.0 g kg−1) concentrations (5–95% range). Gravimetric soil water content (SWC) was determined at WHC and at saturation. Both clay and SOC concentrations strongly influenced SWC; the effect of SOC was strongest and nonlinear. To achieve 50% WFPS, gravimetric SWC was 0.69 ± 0.10 times that of WHC and 0.59 ± 0.03 times that of saturation. For soil biological assays, 50% WFPS could be accurately and simply achieved with calculations using gravimetric SWC at saturation multiplied by 0.59. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20029 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alanjfranzluebbers holdingwaterwithcapacitytotargetporosity |
_version_ |
1724284154396278784 |