The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463 |
id |
doaj-b1863a81c62540dea2c354688eb24ac4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b1863a81c62540dea2c354688eb24ac42020-11-24T22:27:27ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412016-01-01201610.1155/2016/36274633627463The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro StudyA. Eralp Akca0Gülçin Akca1Fulya Toksoy Topçu2Enis Macit3Levent Pikdöken4I. Şerif Özgen5Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Istanbul Kemerburgaz University, Mahmutbey, 34217 Istanbul, TurkeyGazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Medical Microbiology, Emek, 06510 Ankara, TurkeyGulhane Military Medical Academy, Center for Dental Sciences, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Etlik, 06010 Ankara, TurkeyGulhane Military Medical Academy, Department of Analytical Toxicology, Etlik, 06010 Ankara, TurkeyGulhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Department of Dentistry, Section of Periodontology, Haydarpasa, 34668 Istanbul, TurkeyFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Surgery, Istanbul Kemerburgaz University, Mahmutbey, 34217 Istanbul, TurkeyThis study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
A. Eralp Akca Gülçin Akca Fulya Toksoy Topçu Enis Macit Levent Pikdöken I. Şerif Özgen |
spellingShingle |
A. Eralp Akca Gülçin Akca Fulya Toksoy Topçu Enis Macit Levent Pikdöken I. Şerif Özgen The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
A. Eralp Akca Gülçin Akca Fulya Toksoy Topçu Enis Macit Levent Pikdöken I. Şerif Özgen |
author_sort |
A. Eralp Akca |
title |
The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_short |
The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_full |
The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr |
The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort |
comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of propolis with chlorhexidine against oral pathogens: an in vitro study |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aeralpakca thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT gulcinakca thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT fulyatoksoytopcu thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT enismacit thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT leventpikdoken thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT iserifozgen thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT aeralpakca comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT gulcinakca comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT fulyatoksoytopcu comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT enismacit comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT leventpikdoken comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT iserifozgen comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1725749872392404992 |