The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study

This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Eralp Akca, Gülçin Akca, Fulya Toksoy Topçu, Enis Macit, Levent Pikdöken, I. Şerif Özgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463
id doaj-b1863a81c62540dea2c354688eb24ac4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1863a81c62540dea2c354688eb24ac42020-11-24T22:27:27ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412016-01-01201610.1155/2016/36274633627463The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro StudyA. Eralp Akca0Gülçin Akca1Fulya Toksoy Topçu2Enis Macit3Levent Pikdöken4I. Şerif Özgen5Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Istanbul Kemerburgaz University, Mahmutbey, 34217 Istanbul, TurkeyGazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Medical Microbiology, Emek, 06510 Ankara, TurkeyGulhane Military Medical Academy, Center for Dental Sciences, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Etlik, 06010 Ankara, TurkeyGulhane Military Medical Academy, Department of Analytical Toxicology, Etlik, 06010 Ankara, TurkeyGulhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Department of Dentistry, Section of Periodontology, Haydarpasa, 34668 Istanbul, TurkeyFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Surgery, Istanbul Kemerburgaz University, Mahmutbey, 34217 Istanbul, TurkeyThis study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Eralp Akca
Gülçin Akca
Fulya Toksoy Topçu
Enis Macit
Levent Pikdöken
I. Şerif Özgen
spellingShingle A. Eralp Akca
Gülçin Akca
Fulya Toksoy Topçu
Enis Macit
Levent Pikdöken
I. Şerif Özgen
The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
BioMed Research International
author_facet A. Eralp Akca
Gülçin Akca
Fulya Toksoy Topçu
Enis Macit
Levent Pikdöken
I. Şerif Özgen
author_sort A. Eralp Akca
title The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_short The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_full The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of propolis with chlorhexidine against oral pathogens: an in vitro study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2016-01-01
description This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463
work_keys_str_mv AT aeralpakca thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT gulcinakca thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT fulyatoksoytopcu thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT enismacit thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT leventpikdoken thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT iserifozgen thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT aeralpakca comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT gulcinakca comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT fulyatoksoytopcu comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT enismacit comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT leventpikdoken comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT iserifozgen comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1725749872392404992