Countershading Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Break Shape-From-Shading Inference

Animal camouflage is a paradigmatic example of evolution by natural selection, and can only be understood in terms of adaptation to deceive the brains of potential predators and to the environment. Counter-shading is a very common pattern of coloration in the animal kingdom. Countershaded animals ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O Penacchio, P.G Lovell, G.D Ruxton, I.C Cuthill, J.M Harris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-08-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:http://ipe.sagepub.com/content/5/5/471.full.pdf
id doaj-b1817d3733f54a53b132ae1dd36f388d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1817d3733f54a53b132ae1dd36f388d2020-11-25T03:55:52ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952014-08-015547147110.1068/ii4010.1068_ii40Countershading Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Break Shape-From-Shading InferenceO Penacchio0P.G Lovell1G.D Ruxton2I.C Cuthill3J.M Harris4School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, UKDivision of Psychology, Social and Health Sciences, Abertay University, UKSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, UKSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, UKSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, UKAnimal camouflage is a paradigmatic example of evolution by natural selection, and can only be understood in terms of adaptation to deceive the brains of potential predators and to the environment. Counter-shading is a very common pattern of coloration in the animal kingdom. Countershaded animals are darker on the side that faces a greater light intensity (typically, the back) and have a lighter opposite face. This pattern counterbalances shadowing and may make the animal harder to see against its background, or potentially modifies its perceived shape. Here we model the interaction of light and body shape to predict what the coloration of an animal should be to deceive a predator that has evolved the ability to detect shape from shading. We assess to what extent optimal patterns for crypsis depend on both light distribution and body orientation. We unveil the logical link between matching the background and reducing shape cues.http://ipe.sagepub.com/content/5/5/471.full.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author O Penacchio
P.G Lovell
G.D Ruxton
I.C Cuthill
J.M Harris
spellingShingle O Penacchio
P.G Lovell
G.D Ruxton
I.C Cuthill
J.M Harris
Countershading Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Break Shape-From-Shading Inference
i-Perception
author_facet O Penacchio
P.G Lovell
G.D Ruxton
I.C Cuthill
J.M Harris
author_sort O Penacchio
title Countershading Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Break Shape-From-Shading Inference
title_short Countershading Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Break Shape-From-Shading Inference
title_full Countershading Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Break Shape-From-Shading Inference
title_fullStr Countershading Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Break Shape-From-Shading Inference
title_full_unstemmed Countershading Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Break Shape-From-Shading Inference
title_sort countershading camouflage: exploiting photons to break shape-from-shading inference
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Animal camouflage is a paradigmatic example of evolution by natural selection, and can only be understood in terms of adaptation to deceive the brains of potential predators and to the environment. Counter-shading is a very common pattern of coloration in the animal kingdom. Countershaded animals are darker on the side that faces a greater light intensity (typically, the back) and have a lighter opposite face. This pattern counterbalances shadowing and may make the animal harder to see against its background, or potentially modifies its perceived shape. Here we model the interaction of light and body shape to predict what the coloration of an animal should be to deceive a predator that has evolved the ability to detect shape from shading. We assess to what extent optimal patterns for crypsis depend on both light distribution and body orientation. We unveil the logical link between matching the background and reducing shape cues.
url http://ipe.sagepub.com/content/5/5/471.full.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT openacchio countershadingcamouflageexploitingphotonstobreakshapefromshadinginference
AT pglovell countershadingcamouflageexploitingphotonstobreakshapefromshadinginference
AT gdruxton countershadingcamouflageexploitingphotonstobreakshapefromshadinginference
AT iccuthill countershadingcamouflageexploitingphotonstobreakshapefromshadinginference
AT jmharris countershadingcamouflageexploitingphotonstobreakshapefromshadinginference
_version_ 1724467668499562496