Comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs Ololygon and Scinax (Arboranae, Hylidae, Scinaxinae)

According to the recent taxonomic and phylogenetic revision of the family Hylidae, species of the former Scinax catharinae (Boulenger, 1888) clade were included in the resurrected genus Ololygon Fitzinger, 1843, while species of the Scinax ruber (Laurenti, 1768) clade were mostly i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simone Lilian Gruber, Gabriela Isabela Gomes de Oliveira, Ana Paula Zampieri Silva, Hideki Narimatsu, Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad, Sanae Kasahara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2017-04-01
Series:Comparative Cytogenetics
Online Access:http://compcytogen.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=11254
id doaj-b17ee55e2e98474bb7aa771ec3dba26c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b17ee55e2e98474bb7aa771ec3dba26c2020-11-24T23:02:00ZengPensoft PublishersComparative Cytogenetics1993-07711993-078X2017-04-0111226728310.3897/CompCytogen.v11i2.1125411254Comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs Ololygon and Scinax (Arboranae, Hylidae, Scinaxinae)Simone Lilian Gruber0Gabriela Isabela Gomes de Oliveira1Ana Paula Zampieri Silva2Hideki Narimatsu3Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad4Sanae Kasahara5UNESP, Universidade Estadual PaulistaUNESP, Universidade Estadual PaulistaUNESP, Universidade Estadual PaulistaUNESP, Universidade Estadual PaulistaUNESP, Universidade Estadual PaulistaUNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista According to the recent taxonomic and phylogenetic revision of the family Hylidae, species of the former Scinax catharinae (Boulenger, 1888) clade were included in the resurrected genus Ololygon Fitzinger, 1843, while species of the Scinax ruber (Laurenti, 1768) clade were mostly included in the genus Scinax Wagler, 1830, and two were allocated to the newly created genus Julianus Duellman et al., 2016. Although all the species of the former Scinax genus shared a diploid number of 2n = 24 and the same fundamental number of chromosome arms of FN = 48, two karyotypic constitutions were unequivocally recognized, related mainly to the distinct size and morphology of the first two chromosome pairs. Some possible mechanisms for these differences had been suggested, but without any experimental evidence. In this paper, a comparison was carried out based on replication chromosome banding, obtained after DNA incorporation of 5-bromodeoxiuridine in chromosomes of Ololygon and Scinax. The obtained results revealed that the loss of repetitive segments in chromosome pairs 1 and 2 was the mechanism responsible for karyotype difference. The distinct localization of the nucleolus organizer regions in the species of both genera also differentiates the two karyotypic constitutions. http://compcytogen.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=11254
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simone Lilian Gruber
Gabriela Isabela Gomes de Oliveira
Ana Paula Zampieri Silva
Hideki Narimatsu
Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad
Sanae Kasahara
spellingShingle Simone Lilian Gruber
Gabriela Isabela Gomes de Oliveira
Ana Paula Zampieri Silva
Hideki Narimatsu
Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad
Sanae Kasahara
Comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs Ololygon and Scinax (Arboranae, Hylidae, Scinaxinae)
Comparative Cytogenetics
author_facet Simone Lilian Gruber
Gabriela Isabela Gomes de Oliveira
Ana Paula Zampieri Silva
Hideki Narimatsu
Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad
Sanae Kasahara
author_sort Simone Lilian Gruber
title Comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs Ololygon and Scinax (Arboranae, Hylidae, Scinaxinae)
title_short Comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs Ololygon and Scinax (Arboranae, Hylidae, Scinaxinae)
title_full Comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs Ololygon and Scinax (Arboranae, Hylidae, Scinaxinae)
title_fullStr Comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs Ololygon and Scinax (Arboranae, Hylidae, Scinaxinae)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs Ololygon and Scinax (Arboranae, Hylidae, Scinaxinae)
title_sort comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs ololygon and scinax (arboranae, hylidae, scinaxinae)
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series Comparative Cytogenetics
issn 1993-0771
1993-078X
publishDate 2017-04-01
description According to the recent taxonomic and phylogenetic revision of the family Hylidae, species of the former Scinax catharinae (Boulenger, 1888) clade were included in the resurrected genus Ololygon Fitzinger, 1843, while species of the Scinax ruber (Laurenti, 1768) clade were mostly included in the genus Scinax Wagler, 1830, and two were allocated to the newly created genus Julianus Duellman et al., 2016. Although all the species of the former Scinax genus shared a diploid number of 2n = 24 and the same fundamental number of chromosome arms of FN = 48, two karyotypic constitutions were unequivocally recognized, related mainly to the distinct size and morphology of the first two chromosome pairs. Some possible mechanisms for these differences had been suggested, but without any experimental evidence. In this paper, a comparison was carried out based on replication chromosome banding, obtained after DNA incorporation of 5-bromodeoxiuridine in chromosomes of Ololygon and Scinax. The obtained results revealed that the loss of repetitive segments in chromosome pairs 1 and 2 was the mechanism responsible for karyotype difference. The distinct localization of the nucleolus organizer regions in the species of both genera also differentiates the two karyotypic constitutions.
url http://compcytogen.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=11254
work_keys_str_mv AT simoneliliangruber comparativeanalysisbasedonreplicationbandingrevealsthemechanismresponsibleforthedifferenceinthekaryotypeconstitutionoftreefrogsololygonandscinaxarboranaehylidaescinaxinae
AT gabrielaisabelagomesdeoliveira comparativeanalysisbasedonreplicationbandingrevealsthemechanismresponsibleforthedifferenceinthekaryotypeconstitutionoftreefrogsololygonandscinaxarboranaehylidaescinaxinae
AT anapaulazampierisilva comparativeanalysisbasedonreplicationbandingrevealsthemechanismresponsibleforthedifferenceinthekaryotypeconstitutionoftreefrogsololygonandscinaxarboranaehylidaescinaxinae
AT hidekinarimatsu comparativeanalysisbasedonreplicationbandingrevealsthemechanismresponsibleforthedifferenceinthekaryotypeconstitutionoftreefrogsololygonandscinaxarboranaehylidaescinaxinae
AT celiofernandobaptistahaddad comparativeanalysisbasedonreplicationbandingrevealsthemechanismresponsibleforthedifferenceinthekaryotypeconstitutionoftreefrogsololygonandscinaxarboranaehylidaescinaxinae
AT sanaekasahara comparativeanalysisbasedonreplicationbandingrevealsthemechanismresponsibleforthedifferenceinthekaryotypeconstitutionoftreefrogsololygonandscinaxarboranaehylidaescinaxinae
_version_ 1725637828444946432