P2-24: Emotional Contents of Faces are Not Only Determined by Visual Characteristics of Facial Features Alone but Also by what the Features Do Stand for

Emotional contents of faces would pose ambiguity when each facial feature varies in a subtle manner. Here we propose that such ambiguity may not solely arise from visual similarity in facial expressions but also from the way the expressions are interpreted in our daily life. In the present experimen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joo-Seok Hyun, Hyung-Bum Park, Youngseon Shin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-10-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/if683
id doaj-b17e83edb4984f1983f0c16e58eb3481
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b17e83edb4984f1983f0c16e58eb34812020-11-25T04:09:08ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952012-10-01310.1068/if68310.1068_if683P2-24: Emotional Contents of Faces are Not Only Determined by Visual Characteristics of Facial Features Alone but Also by what the Features Do Stand forJoo-Seok Hyun0Hyung-Bum ParkYoungseon ShinDepartment of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, KoreaEmotional contents of faces would pose ambiguity when each facial feature varies in a subtle manner. Here we propose that such ambiguity may not solely arise from visual similarity in facial expressions but also from the way the expressions are interpreted in our daily life. In the present experiments, we asked participants to search for a target face with no facial expression (i.e., neutral) either (1) among a set of faces with smiles (i.e., pleasant) or (2) among faces with an angry frown (i.e., unpleasant). The face stimuli were either photographs taken from real faces or simple line drawings. The participants were asked to report target presence or absence as fast as possible. In the target-present trials, mean search response time was faster if distractors were all pleasant faces, whereas it was rather delayed if the distractors were all unpleasant faces. Further, the overall response times in the target-absent trials were slower than the target-present trials, and the pattern of the delay was more evident if the distractors were all unpleasant faces than all pleasant faces. The results indicate that the neutral target face among unpleasant faces is difficult to be searched after, whereas it is relatively easy among pleasant faces. The results also suggest that what determines emotional contents of faces is not only the visual similarity across facial expressions but also what the expressions do stand for in our daily life.https://doi.org/10.1068/if683
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joo-Seok Hyun
Hyung-Bum Park
Youngseon Shin
spellingShingle Joo-Seok Hyun
Hyung-Bum Park
Youngseon Shin
P2-24: Emotional Contents of Faces are Not Only Determined by Visual Characteristics of Facial Features Alone but Also by what the Features Do Stand for
i-Perception
author_facet Joo-Seok Hyun
Hyung-Bum Park
Youngseon Shin
author_sort Joo-Seok Hyun
title P2-24: Emotional Contents of Faces are Not Only Determined by Visual Characteristics of Facial Features Alone but Also by what the Features Do Stand for
title_short P2-24: Emotional Contents of Faces are Not Only Determined by Visual Characteristics of Facial Features Alone but Also by what the Features Do Stand for
title_full P2-24: Emotional Contents of Faces are Not Only Determined by Visual Characteristics of Facial Features Alone but Also by what the Features Do Stand for
title_fullStr P2-24: Emotional Contents of Faces are Not Only Determined by Visual Characteristics of Facial Features Alone but Also by what the Features Do Stand for
title_full_unstemmed P2-24: Emotional Contents of Faces are Not Only Determined by Visual Characteristics of Facial Features Alone but Also by what the Features Do Stand for
title_sort p2-24: emotional contents of faces are not only determined by visual characteristics of facial features alone but also by what the features do stand for
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Emotional contents of faces would pose ambiguity when each facial feature varies in a subtle manner. Here we propose that such ambiguity may not solely arise from visual similarity in facial expressions but also from the way the expressions are interpreted in our daily life. In the present experiments, we asked participants to search for a target face with no facial expression (i.e., neutral) either (1) among a set of faces with smiles (i.e., pleasant) or (2) among faces with an angry frown (i.e., unpleasant). The face stimuli were either photographs taken from real faces or simple line drawings. The participants were asked to report target presence or absence as fast as possible. In the target-present trials, mean search response time was faster if distractors were all pleasant faces, whereas it was rather delayed if the distractors were all unpleasant faces. Further, the overall response times in the target-absent trials were slower than the target-present trials, and the pattern of the delay was more evident if the distractors were all unpleasant faces than all pleasant faces. The results indicate that the neutral target face among unpleasant faces is difficult to be searched after, whereas it is relatively easy among pleasant faces. The results also suggest that what determines emotional contents of faces is not only the visual similarity across facial expressions but also what the expressions do stand for in our daily life.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/if683
work_keys_str_mv AT jooseokhyun p224emotionalcontentsoffacesarenotonlydeterminedbyvisualcharacteristicsoffacialfeaturesalonebutalsobywhatthefeaturesdostandfor
AT hyungbumpark p224emotionalcontentsoffacesarenotonlydeterminedbyvisualcharacteristicsoffacialfeaturesalonebutalsobywhatthefeaturesdostandfor
AT youngseonshin p224emotionalcontentsoffacesarenotonlydeterminedbyvisualcharacteristicsoffacialfeaturesalonebutalsobywhatthefeaturesdostandfor
_version_ 1724423200327073792