Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer—What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician’s Point of View?

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) cause a subset of head and neck cancers (HNSCC). HPV16 predominantly signs responsible for approximately 10% of all HNSCC and over 50% of tonsillar (T)SCCs. Prevalence rates depend on several factors, such as the geographical region where patients live, possibly due to d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Markus Hoffmann, Elgar Susanne Quabius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
HPV
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/6/1173
id doaj-b13f4aa3866b411ab15fa11c4527468c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b13f4aa3866b411ab15fa11c4527468c2021-07-01T00:35:23ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152021-06-01131173117310.3390/v13061173Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer—What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician’s Point of View?Markus Hoffmann0Elgar Susanne Quabius1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, D24105 Kiel, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, D24105 Kiel, GermanyHuman papillomaviruses (HPV) cause a subset of head and neck cancers (HNSCC). HPV16 predominantly signs responsible for approximately 10% of all HNSCC and over 50% of tonsillar (T)SCCs. Prevalence rates depend on several factors, such as the geographical region where patients live, possibly due to different social and sexual habits. Smoking plays an important role, with non-smoking patients being mostly HPV-positive and smokers being mostly HPV-negative. This is of unparalleled clinical relevance, as the outcome of (non-smoking) HPV-positive patients is significantly better, albeit with standard and not with de-escalated therapies. The results of the first prospective de-escalation studies have dampened hopes that similar superior survival can be achieved with de-escalated therapy. In this context, it is important to note that the inclusion of p16<sup>INK4A</sup> (a surrogate marker for HPV-positivity) in the 8th TMN-classification has only prognostic, not therapeutic, intent. To avoid misclassification, highest precision in determining HPV-status is of utmost importance. Whenever possible, PCR-based methods, still referred to as the "gold standard”, should be used. New diagnostic antibodies represent some hope, e.g., to detect primaries and recurrences early. Prophylactic HPV vaccination should lead to a decline in HPV-driven HNSCC as well. This review discusses the above aspects in detail.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/6/1173HPVoutcomesmokingco-morbiditydetection method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Markus Hoffmann
Elgar Susanne Quabius
spellingShingle Markus Hoffmann
Elgar Susanne Quabius
Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer—What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician’s Point of View?
Viruses
HPV
outcome
smoking
co-morbidity
detection method
author_facet Markus Hoffmann
Elgar Susanne Quabius
author_sort Markus Hoffmann
title Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer—What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician’s Point of View?
title_short Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer—What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician’s Point of View?
title_full Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer—What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician’s Point of View?
title_fullStr Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer—What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician’s Point of View?
title_full_unstemmed Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer—What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician’s Point of View?
title_sort relevance of human papillomaviruses in head and neck cancer—what remains in 2021 from a clinician’s point of view?
publisher MDPI AG
series Viruses
issn 1999-4915
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Human papillomaviruses (HPV) cause a subset of head and neck cancers (HNSCC). HPV16 predominantly signs responsible for approximately 10% of all HNSCC and over 50% of tonsillar (T)SCCs. Prevalence rates depend on several factors, such as the geographical region where patients live, possibly due to different social and sexual habits. Smoking plays an important role, with non-smoking patients being mostly HPV-positive and smokers being mostly HPV-negative. This is of unparalleled clinical relevance, as the outcome of (non-smoking) HPV-positive patients is significantly better, albeit with standard and not with de-escalated therapies. The results of the first prospective de-escalation studies have dampened hopes that similar superior survival can be achieved with de-escalated therapy. In this context, it is important to note that the inclusion of p16<sup>INK4A</sup> (a surrogate marker for HPV-positivity) in the 8th TMN-classification has only prognostic, not therapeutic, intent. To avoid misclassification, highest precision in determining HPV-status is of utmost importance. Whenever possible, PCR-based methods, still referred to as the "gold standard”, should be used. New diagnostic antibodies represent some hope, e.g., to detect primaries and recurrences early. Prophylactic HPV vaccination should lead to a decline in HPV-driven HNSCC as well. This review discusses the above aspects in detail.
topic HPV
outcome
smoking
co-morbidity
detection method
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/6/1173
work_keys_str_mv AT markushoffmann relevanceofhumanpapillomavirusesinheadandneckcancerwhatremainsin2021fromaclinicianspointofview
AT elgarsusannequabius relevanceofhumanpapillomavirusesinheadandneckcancerwhatremainsin2021fromaclinicianspointofview
_version_ 1721348204217237504