Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation

Abstract Background In June 2019, the Australian state of Victoria joined the growing number of jurisdictions around the world to have legalised some form of voluntary assisted dying. A discourse of safety was prominent during the implementation of the Victorian legislation. Main text In this paper,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosalind McDougall, Bridget Pratt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-020-00483-5
id doaj-b13dd86fe41c47d7a3a16da461b4d479
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b13dd86fe41c47d7a3a16da461b4d4792020-11-25T03:37:06ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392020-05-0121111010.1186/s12910-020-00483-5Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislationRosalind McDougall0Bridget Pratt1Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of MelbourneCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of MelbourneAbstract Background In June 2019, the Australian state of Victoria joined the growing number of jurisdictions around the world to have legalised some form of voluntary assisted dying. A discourse of safety was prominent during the implementation of the Victorian legislation. Main text In this paper, we analyse the ethical relationship between legislative “safeguards” and equal access. Drawing primarily on Ruger’s model of equal access to health care services, we analyse the Victorian approach to voluntary assisted dying in terms of four dimensions: horizontal equity, patient agency, high quality care, and supportive social norms. We argue that some provisions framed as safeguards in the legislation create significant barriers to equal access for eligible patients. Conclusions While safety is undoubtedly ethically important, we caution against an overemphasis on safeguarding in voluntary assisted dying legislation given the implications for equal access.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-020-00483-5Voluntary assisted dyingMedical assistance in dyingEqual accessEquity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rosalind McDougall
Bridget Pratt
spellingShingle Rosalind McDougall
Bridget Pratt
Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation
BMC Medical Ethics
Voluntary assisted dying
Medical assistance in dying
Equal access
Equity
author_facet Rosalind McDougall
Bridget Pratt
author_sort Rosalind McDougall
title Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation
title_short Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation
title_full Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation
title_fullStr Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation
title_full_unstemmed Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation
title_sort too much safety? safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Ethics
issn 1472-6939
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background In June 2019, the Australian state of Victoria joined the growing number of jurisdictions around the world to have legalised some form of voluntary assisted dying. A discourse of safety was prominent during the implementation of the Victorian legislation. Main text In this paper, we analyse the ethical relationship between legislative “safeguards” and equal access. Drawing primarily on Ruger’s model of equal access to health care services, we analyse the Victorian approach to voluntary assisted dying in terms of four dimensions: horizontal equity, patient agency, high quality care, and supportive social norms. We argue that some provisions framed as safeguards in the legislation create significant barriers to equal access for eligible patients. Conclusions While safety is undoubtedly ethically important, we caution against an overemphasis on safeguarding in voluntary assisted dying legislation given the implications for equal access.
topic Voluntary assisted dying
Medical assistance in dying
Equal access
Equity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-020-00483-5
work_keys_str_mv AT rosalindmcdougall toomuchsafetysafeguardsandequalaccessinthecontextofvoluntaryassisteddyinglegislation
AT bridgetpratt toomuchsafetysafeguardsandequalaccessinthecontextofvoluntaryassisteddyinglegislation
_version_ 1724547111942356992