Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) In Decision Support Systems

Decision support system is a way to help decision maker to choose the best decision from several available alternatives. In the process of decision support system required criteria and weights to be used in the calculation process. Simple additive weighting (SAW) and Weigthed product (WP) are method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wira Trise Putra Dede, Agustian Punggara Adrian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821501003
id doaj-b1201aff2f2541de9743da1245cb9006
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1201aff2f2541de9743da1245cb90062021-04-02T11:11:23ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-012150100310.1051/matecconf/201821501003matecconf_ictis2018_01003Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) In Decision Support SystemsWira Trise Putra DedeAgustian Punggara AdrianDecision support system is a way to help decision maker to choose the best decision from several available alternatives. In the process of decision support system required criteria and weights to be used in the calculation process. Simple additive weighting (SAW) and Weigthed product (WP) are methods in decision support systems that have a search method taking into account the weights held by the criteria. comparison analysis is performed to look at between the WP and SAW methods, methods that have a higher level of accuracy and are in accordance with the conditions. The SAW method uses a weighted weaning system whereas the WP method uses multiplication in calculating the attribute rating. From the weight of each criteria there will be used in the calculation to produce several alternatives. The object of the case study in this study is the determination of people’s business credit in the banking world using seven criteria. the criteria used are personal character, credit status, business condition, income, guarantee, guarantee condition and installment. Results of testing using SAW method and WP method, it can help compare the best alternative level results by using the same data and criteria, so both methods can be used as consideration in decision making. WP method gives clear cost and benefit value compared to SAW, but in SAW result gives more clear result because it is based on predetermined value and weight.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821501003
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wira Trise Putra Dede
Agustian Punggara Adrian
spellingShingle Wira Trise Putra Dede
Agustian Punggara Adrian
Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) In Decision Support Systems
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Wira Trise Putra Dede
Agustian Punggara Adrian
author_sort Wira Trise Putra Dede
title Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) In Decision Support Systems
title_short Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) In Decision Support Systems
title_full Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) In Decision Support Systems
title_fullStr Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) In Decision Support Systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) In Decision Support Systems
title_sort comparison analysis of simple additive weighting (saw) and weigthed product (wp) in decision support systems
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Decision support system is a way to help decision maker to choose the best decision from several available alternatives. In the process of decision support system required criteria and weights to be used in the calculation process. Simple additive weighting (SAW) and Weigthed product (WP) are methods in decision support systems that have a search method taking into account the weights held by the criteria. comparison analysis is performed to look at between the WP and SAW methods, methods that have a higher level of accuracy and are in accordance with the conditions. The SAW method uses a weighted weaning system whereas the WP method uses multiplication in calculating the attribute rating. From the weight of each criteria there will be used in the calculation to produce several alternatives. The object of the case study in this study is the determination of people’s business credit in the banking world using seven criteria. the criteria used are personal character, credit status, business condition, income, guarantee, guarantee condition and installment. Results of testing using SAW method and WP method, it can help compare the best alternative level results by using the same data and criteria, so both methods can be used as consideration in decision making. WP method gives clear cost and benefit value compared to SAW, but in SAW result gives more clear result because it is based on predetermined value and weight.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821501003
work_keys_str_mv AT wiratriseputradede comparisonanalysisofsimpleadditiveweightingsawandweigthedproductwpindecisionsupportsystems
AT agustianpunggaraadrian comparisonanalysisofsimpleadditiveweightingsawandweigthedproductwpindecisionsupportsystems
_version_ 1724165589446950912