Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences

This study adjusts the Driving forces–Pressures–State–Impact–Response framework (DPSIR) to analyze the interregional similarities and differences with regard to sustainable tourism development in selected Mediterranean (MED) regions. The study involved three steps. The first step was a critical refl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smiljana Pivčević, Lidija Petrić, Ante Mandić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7641
id doaj-b10c7f3121264038889e48aed4397e76
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b10c7f3121264038889e48aed4397e762020-11-25T03:07:26ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-09-01127641764110.3390/su12187641Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and DifferencesSmiljana Pivčević0Lidija Petrić1Ante Mandić2Department of Tourism and Economy, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Split, 21000 Split, CroatiaDepartment of Tourism and Economy, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Split, 21000 Split, CroatiaDepartment of Tourism and Economy, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Split, 21000 Split, CroatiaThis study adjusts the Driving forces–Pressures–State–Impact–Response framework (DPSIR) to analyze the interregional similarities and differences with regard to sustainable tourism development in selected Mediterranean (MED) regions. The study involved three steps. The first step was a critical reflection on sustainable tourism indicators and DPSIR as a grouping approach. The analysis yielded 29 sustainability indicators distributed within four components of the DPSR framework. The data were collected for 54 NUTS 2 level MED regions. In the second step, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by a cluster analysis (CA) were performed to group homogenous regions and generate the Med Regions Cluster Matrix (MRCM). The investigation revealed that although countries in the Mediterranean share many characteristics in terms of tourism development and impacts, universal policies in mitigating the pressures are not appropriate. The main contributions of the study are (1) the application of the DPSIR model in the sustainable tourism context (2) and the analysis of the similarities and differences regarding the sustainability of tourism development in the selected MED regions. The conclusions of the analysis may stimulate the debate on mutual responses and sustainable tourism policy responses in the MED region.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7641sustainable tourism developmenttourism policysustainability indicatorscluster analysisfactor analysisMediterranean
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Smiljana Pivčević
Lidija Petrić
Ante Mandić
spellingShingle Smiljana Pivčević
Lidija Petrić
Ante Mandić
Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences
Sustainability
sustainable tourism development
tourism policy
sustainability indicators
cluster analysis
factor analysis
Mediterranean
author_facet Smiljana Pivčević
Lidija Petrić
Ante Mandić
author_sort Smiljana Pivčević
title Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences
title_short Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences
title_full Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences
title_fullStr Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences
title_sort sustainability of tourism development in the mediterranean—interregional similarities and differences
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-09-01
description This study adjusts the Driving forces–Pressures–State–Impact–Response framework (DPSIR) to analyze the interregional similarities and differences with regard to sustainable tourism development in selected Mediterranean (MED) regions. The study involved three steps. The first step was a critical reflection on sustainable tourism indicators and DPSIR as a grouping approach. The analysis yielded 29 sustainability indicators distributed within four components of the DPSR framework. The data were collected for 54 NUTS 2 level MED regions. In the second step, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by a cluster analysis (CA) were performed to group homogenous regions and generate the Med Regions Cluster Matrix (MRCM). The investigation revealed that although countries in the Mediterranean share many characteristics in terms of tourism development and impacts, universal policies in mitigating the pressures are not appropriate. The main contributions of the study are (1) the application of the DPSIR model in the sustainable tourism context (2) and the analysis of the similarities and differences regarding the sustainability of tourism development in the selected MED regions. The conclusions of the analysis may stimulate the debate on mutual responses and sustainable tourism policy responses in the MED region.
topic sustainable tourism development
tourism policy
sustainability indicators
cluster analysis
factor analysis
Mediterranean
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7641
work_keys_str_mv AT smiljanapivcevic sustainabilityoftourismdevelopmentinthemediterraneaninterregionalsimilaritiesanddifferences
AT lidijapetric sustainabilityoftourismdevelopmentinthemediterraneaninterregionalsimilaritiesanddifferences
AT antemandic sustainabilityoftourismdevelopmentinthemediterraneaninterregionalsimilaritiesanddifferences
_version_ 1724670530315878400