Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences
This study adjusts the Driving forces–Pressures–State–Impact–Response framework (DPSIR) to analyze the interregional similarities and differences with regard to sustainable tourism development in selected Mediterranean (MED) regions. The study involved three steps. The first step was a critical refl...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7641 |
id |
doaj-b10c7f3121264038889e48aed4397e76 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b10c7f3121264038889e48aed4397e762020-11-25T03:07:26ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-09-01127641764110.3390/su12187641Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and DifferencesSmiljana Pivčević0Lidija Petrić1Ante Mandić2Department of Tourism and Economy, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Split, 21000 Split, CroatiaDepartment of Tourism and Economy, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Split, 21000 Split, CroatiaDepartment of Tourism and Economy, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Split, 21000 Split, CroatiaThis study adjusts the Driving forces–Pressures–State–Impact–Response framework (DPSIR) to analyze the interregional similarities and differences with regard to sustainable tourism development in selected Mediterranean (MED) regions. The study involved three steps. The first step was a critical reflection on sustainable tourism indicators and DPSIR as a grouping approach. The analysis yielded 29 sustainability indicators distributed within four components of the DPSR framework. The data were collected for 54 NUTS 2 level MED regions. In the second step, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by a cluster analysis (CA) were performed to group homogenous regions and generate the Med Regions Cluster Matrix (MRCM). The investigation revealed that although countries in the Mediterranean share many characteristics in terms of tourism development and impacts, universal policies in mitigating the pressures are not appropriate. The main contributions of the study are (1) the application of the DPSIR model in the sustainable tourism context (2) and the analysis of the similarities and differences regarding the sustainability of tourism development in the selected MED regions. The conclusions of the analysis may stimulate the debate on mutual responses and sustainable tourism policy responses in the MED region.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7641sustainable tourism developmenttourism policysustainability indicatorscluster analysisfactor analysisMediterranean |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Smiljana Pivčević Lidija Petrić Ante Mandić |
spellingShingle |
Smiljana Pivčević Lidija Petrić Ante Mandić Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences Sustainability sustainable tourism development tourism policy sustainability indicators cluster analysis factor analysis Mediterranean |
author_facet |
Smiljana Pivčević Lidija Petrić Ante Mandić |
author_sort |
Smiljana Pivčević |
title |
Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences |
title_short |
Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences |
title_full |
Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences |
title_fullStr |
Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences |
title_sort |
sustainability of tourism development in the mediterranean—interregional similarities and differences |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
This study adjusts the Driving forces–Pressures–State–Impact–Response framework (DPSIR) to analyze the interregional similarities and differences with regard to sustainable tourism development in selected Mediterranean (MED) regions. The study involved three steps. The first step was a critical reflection on sustainable tourism indicators and DPSIR as a grouping approach. The analysis yielded 29 sustainability indicators distributed within four components of the DPSR framework. The data were collected for 54 NUTS 2 level MED regions. In the second step, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by a cluster analysis (CA) were performed to group homogenous regions and generate the Med Regions Cluster Matrix (MRCM). The investigation revealed that although countries in the Mediterranean share many characteristics in terms of tourism development and impacts, universal policies in mitigating the pressures are not appropriate. The main contributions of the study are (1) the application of the DPSIR model in the sustainable tourism context (2) and the analysis of the similarities and differences regarding the sustainability of tourism development in the selected MED regions. The conclusions of the analysis may stimulate the debate on mutual responses and sustainable tourism policy responses in the MED region. |
topic |
sustainable tourism development tourism policy sustainability indicators cluster analysis factor analysis Mediterranean |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7641 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT smiljanapivcevic sustainabilityoftourismdevelopmentinthemediterraneaninterregionalsimilaritiesanddifferences AT lidijapetric sustainabilityoftourismdevelopmentinthemediterraneaninterregionalsimilaritiesanddifferences AT antemandic sustainabilityoftourismdevelopmentinthemediterraneaninterregionalsimilaritiesanddifferences |
_version_ |
1724670530315878400 |