Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes

The popularity of micro-machining is rapidly increasing due to the growing demands for miniature products. Among different micro-machining approaches, micro-turning and micro-milling are widely used in the manufacturing industry. The various cutting parameters of micro-turning and micro-milling has...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milan Joshi, Ranjan Kumar Ghadai, S. Madhu, Kanak Kalita, Xiao-Zhi Gao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/17/5109
Description
Summary:The popularity of micro-machining is rapidly increasing due to the growing demands for miniature products. Among different micro-machining approaches, micro-turning and micro-milling are widely used in the manufacturing industry. The various cutting parameters of micro-turning and micro-milling has a significant effect on the machining performance. Thus, it is essential that the cutting parameters are optimized to obtain the most from the machining process. However, it is often seen that many machining objectives have conflicting parameter settings. For example, generally, a high material removal rate (MRR) is accompanied by high surface roughness (SR). In this paper, metaheuristic multi-objective optimization algorithms are utilized to generate Pareto optimal solutions for micro-turning and micro-milling applications. A comparative study is carried out to assess the performance of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), multi-objective ant lion optimization (MOALO) and multi-objective dragonfly optimization (MODA) in micro-machining applications. The complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method is used to compare the NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA generated Pareto solutions.
ISSN:1996-1944