A Response to John Covaleskie
I have no doubt that Covaleskie's commentary was well- intentioned. Nonetheless, it is seriously flawed. In this response I shall identify the numerous instances of inaccurate and incomplete data, as well as invalid reasoning, upon which his conclusion is based.
Main Author: | Andrew J. Coulson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
1994-08-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Online Access: | http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/675 |
Similar Items
-
Response: John Stokes
by: John Stokes
Published: (2009-04-01) -
Individuality in John Locke and John Stuart Mill: a response to Michael J. Sandel
by: Camcastle, Cara
Published: (2009) -
Individuality in John Locke and John Stuart Mill: a response to Michael J. Sandel
by: Camcastle, Cara
Published: (2009) -
The influence of the theology of John Chrysostom on the writings of John Henry Newman
by: Wadsworth, Andrew Raymond
Published: (2021) -
Responses to the works of John Updike in Slovenia
by: Tamara Klanjšček
Published: (2004-12-01)