Redefining ethnography «in the strict sense of the term»: Perspectives gained from non-standard, old-new fieldwork

This essay reflects on the consequences for ethnography of the reversal of the direction of the anthropological encounter – what exactly happens when anthropologists from the Global South undertake fieldwork among populations in the Global North? I will argue that this does not merely correct histor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chandana Mathur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Cagliari 2018-12-01
Series:Anuac
Online Access:http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/3520
id doaj-b0f8be051282426da0ec231bfaa7b3b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0f8be051282426da0ec231bfaa7b3b92020-11-25T02:39:24ZengUniversità degli Studi di CagliariAnuac2239-625X2018-12-017211913110.7340/anuac2239-625X-35202464Redefining ethnography «in the strict sense of the term»: Perspectives gained from non-standard, old-new fieldworkChandana Mathur0Maynooth UniversityThis essay reflects on the consequences for ethnography of the reversal of the direction of the anthropological encounter – what exactly happens when anthropologists from the Global South undertake fieldwork among populations in the Global North? I will argue that this does not merely correct historical imbalances of anthropological knowledge production, thereby changing the substance of that knowledge itself, although of course that is a goal worth pursuing, as has cogently been pointed out by the “world anthropologies” critique of hegemonic disciplinary practices. Using insights drawn from my own research site in the US heartland, where I conducted fieldwork initially in 1989-91, and then again during a “focused revisit” in 2015, I suggest that lasting misunderstandings between the anthropologist and the research participants are themselves a rich source of data and human possibility. My contention is that non-standard and long-term fieldwork of this kind may help reveal dimensions of the practice of ethnography that would otherwise remain obscured.http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/3520
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chandana Mathur
spellingShingle Chandana Mathur
Redefining ethnography «in the strict sense of the term»: Perspectives gained from non-standard, old-new fieldwork
Anuac
author_facet Chandana Mathur
author_sort Chandana Mathur
title Redefining ethnography «in the strict sense of the term»: Perspectives gained from non-standard, old-new fieldwork
title_short Redefining ethnography «in the strict sense of the term»: Perspectives gained from non-standard, old-new fieldwork
title_full Redefining ethnography «in the strict sense of the term»: Perspectives gained from non-standard, old-new fieldwork
title_fullStr Redefining ethnography «in the strict sense of the term»: Perspectives gained from non-standard, old-new fieldwork
title_full_unstemmed Redefining ethnography «in the strict sense of the term»: Perspectives gained from non-standard, old-new fieldwork
title_sort redefining ethnography «in the strict sense of the term»: perspectives gained from non-standard, old-new fieldwork
publisher Università degli Studi di Cagliari
series Anuac
issn 2239-625X
publishDate 2018-12-01
description This essay reflects on the consequences for ethnography of the reversal of the direction of the anthropological encounter – what exactly happens when anthropologists from the Global South undertake fieldwork among populations in the Global North? I will argue that this does not merely correct historical imbalances of anthropological knowledge production, thereby changing the substance of that knowledge itself, although of course that is a goal worth pursuing, as has cogently been pointed out by the “world anthropologies” critique of hegemonic disciplinary practices. Using insights drawn from my own research site in the US heartland, where I conducted fieldwork initially in 1989-91, and then again during a “focused revisit” in 2015, I suggest that lasting misunderstandings between the anthropologist and the research participants are themselves a rich source of data and human possibility. My contention is that non-standard and long-term fieldwork of this kind may help reveal dimensions of the practice of ethnography that would otherwise remain obscured.
url http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/3520
work_keys_str_mv AT chandanamathur redefiningethnographyinthestrictsenseofthetermperspectivesgainedfromnonstandardoldnewfieldwork
_version_ 1724786320682778624