Short‐Term Efficacy of Different First‐Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis

This study intends to compare short‐term efficacy of 12 chemotherapy regimens in treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by a network meta‐analysis (NMA). PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from the inception of each database to June 2018. Randomized controlled trial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bei‐Bei Zhang, Weibo Zhu, Jun Tao, Yun Li, Chuan‐Chong Du, Yun‐Xia Chen, Yan‐Dong Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-05-01
Series:Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12744
id doaj-b0f54a47fad44a1db7f7983db649534d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0f54a47fad44a1db7f7983db649534d2020-11-25T02:20:54ZengWileyClinical and Translational Science1752-80541752-80622020-05-0113358959810.1111/cts.12744Short‐Term Efficacy of Different First‐Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta‐AnalysisBei‐Bei Zhang0Weibo Zhu1Jun Tao2Yun Li3Chuan‐Chong Du4Yun‐Xia Chen5Yan‐Dong Liu6Department of Respiration Jingjiang People’s Hospital Jingjiang ChinaDepartment of Respiration Jingjiang People’s Hospital Jingjiang ChinaDepartment of Respiration Jingjiang People’s Hospital Jingjiang ChinaDepartment of Respiration Jingjiang People’s Hospital Jingjiang ChinaDepartment of Respiration Jingjiang People’s Hospital Jingjiang ChinaDepartment of Respiration Jingjiang People’s Hospital Jingjiang ChinaDepartment of Respiration Jingjiang People’s Hospital Jingjiang ChinaThis study intends to compare short‐term efficacy of 12 chemotherapy regimens in treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by a network meta‐analysis (NMA). PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from the inception of each database to June 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the 12 chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC were included. Direct and indirect evidence were combined by NMA to evaluate the odds ratio and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of the 12 chemotherapy regimens. Nineteen RCTs that met our inclusion criteria were collected in this study. For partial response (PR), gemcitabine exhibited relatively poor efficacy compared with cisplatin + gemcitabine, carboplatin + gemcitabine, carboplatin + paclitaxel, paclitaxel + gemcitabine, and cisplatin + gemcitabine + vinorelbine. For overall response rate (ORR), gemcitabine had poorer efficacy than cisplatin + gemcitabine and paclitaxel + gemcitabine. For disease control rate (DCR), compared with carboplatin + gemcitabine and gemcitabine, paclitaxel + gemcitabine had a better efficacy. Gemcitabine had the lowest SUCRA values in terms of complete response, PR, ORR, stable disease, and DCR; whereas paclitaxel + gemcitabine ranked the highest in ORR, progressive disease, and DCR. The cluster analysis revealed that cisplatin + gemcitabine, paclitaxel + gemcitabine, and cisplatin + gemcitabine + vinorelbine had better short‐term efficacy for advanced NSCLC. Collectively, short‐term efficacy of multidrug combination chemotherapy regimens was superior to that of single‐drug chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC. Cisplatin + gemcitabine, paclitaxel + gemcitabine, and cisplatin + gemcitabine + vinorelbine may have particularly prominent short‐term efficacy for advanced NSCLC.https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12744
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bei‐Bei Zhang
Weibo Zhu
Jun Tao
Yun Li
Chuan‐Chong Du
Yun‐Xia Chen
Yan‐Dong Liu
spellingShingle Bei‐Bei Zhang
Weibo Zhu
Jun Tao
Yun Li
Chuan‐Chong Du
Yun‐Xia Chen
Yan‐Dong Liu
Short‐Term Efficacy of Different First‐Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis
Clinical and Translational Science
author_facet Bei‐Bei Zhang
Weibo Zhu
Jun Tao
Yun Li
Chuan‐Chong Du
Yun‐Xia Chen
Yan‐Dong Liu
author_sort Bei‐Bei Zhang
title Short‐Term Efficacy of Different First‐Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_short Short‐Term Efficacy of Different First‐Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_full Short‐Term Efficacy of Different First‐Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Short‐Term Efficacy of Different First‐Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Short‐Term Efficacy of Different First‐Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_sort short‐term efficacy of different first‐line chemotherapy regimens for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: a network meta‐analysis
publisher Wiley
series Clinical and Translational Science
issn 1752-8054
1752-8062
publishDate 2020-05-01
description This study intends to compare short‐term efficacy of 12 chemotherapy regimens in treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by a network meta‐analysis (NMA). PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from the inception of each database to June 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the 12 chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC were included. Direct and indirect evidence were combined by NMA to evaluate the odds ratio and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of the 12 chemotherapy regimens. Nineteen RCTs that met our inclusion criteria were collected in this study. For partial response (PR), gemcitabine exhibited relatively poor efficacy compared with cisplatin + gemcitabine, carboplatin + gemcitabine, carboplatin + paclitaxel, paclitaxel + gemcitabine, and cisplatin + gemcitabine + vinorelbine. For overall response rate (ORR), gemcitabine had poorer efficacy than cisplatin + gemcitabine and paclitaxel + gemcitabine. For disease control rate (DCR), compared with carboplatin + gemcitabine and gemcitabine, paclitaxel + gemcitabine had a better efficacy. Gemcitabine had the lowest SUCRA values in terms of complete response, PR, ORR, stable disease, and DCR; whereas paclitaxel + gemcitabine ranked the highest in ORR, progressive disease, and DCR. The cluster analysis revealed that cisplatin + gemcitabine, paclitaxel + gemcitabine, and cisplatin + gemcitabine + vinorelbine had better short‐term efficacy for advanced NSCLC. Collectively, short‐term efficacy of multidrug combination chemotherapy regimens was superior to that of single‐drug chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC. Cisplatin + gemcitabine, paclitaxel + gemcitabine, and cisplatin + gemcitabine + vinorelbine may have particularly prominent short‐term efficacy for advanced NSCLC.
url https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12744
work_keys_str_mv AT beibeizhang shorttermefficacyofdifferentfirstlinechemotherapyregimensforadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT weibozhu shorttermefficacyofdifferentfirstlinechemotherapyregimensforadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT juntao shorttermefficacyofdifferentfirstlinechemotherapyregimensforadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT yunli shorttermefficacyofdifferentfirstlinechemotherapyregimensforadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT chuanchongdu shorttermefficacyofdifferentfirstlinechemotherapyregimensforadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT yunxiachen shorttermefficacyofdifferentfirstlinechemotherapyregimensforadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT yandongliu shorttermefficacyofdifferentfirstlinechemotherapyregimensforadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724869078113320960