The Role of Scientists in Lithuanian Energy Security Discourse Formation

The aim of the article is to investigate the participation of scientists in the energy security discourse. The empirical research was carried out on the basis of qualitative access while conducting semi-structured interviews with representatives from different branches of science. As the results of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Genys Dainius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2013-06-01
Series:Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2013-0008
id doaj-b0ecdd70905f467bbf799ceb07aaf790
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0ecdd70905f467bbf799ceb07aaf7902021-09-05T21:00:29ZengSciendoBaltic Journal of Law & Politics2029-04542013-06-016116318010.2478/bjlp-2013-0008The Role of Scientists in Lithuanian Energy Security Discourse FormationGenys Dainius0Associate Professor; Researcher Energy Security Research Centre, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)The aim of the article is to investigate the participation of scientists in the energy security discourse. The empirical research was carried out on the basis of qualitative access while conducting semi-structured interviews with representatives from different branches of science. As the results of the analysis show, despite the strained relations between scientific knowledge and power, Lithuanian scientists do not succeed in converting scientific knowledge into power. Even though scientists have enough knowledge, it is not transformed into power relations due to an existing specific context and the passive role of scientists themselves. Emerging decision-makers’ efforts to eliminate scientists from Lithuanian energy security discourse formation pushes the latter into the vague situation in which it is difficult to expand their share of expectations. Analyses of the scientific discourse show that scientists interpret the energy events in a broader context: while analysing the processes and specific projects that seek to improve energy security, they notice a more comprehensive view and manage to identify advantages, disadvantages and uncertainties of the latter. While marking out the peculiarities of energy security discourse, it may be claimed that the role of the scientists is not significant; realizing the development of energy system there has not created an institutional mechanism for scientific expertise; scientists are not being involved and they do not rush to participate in the formation of energy security discourse. They equate the distribution of information with the publishing of knowledge in the scientific world.https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2013-0008scientific researchlithuania’s energy securitydiscourse formationdiscourse representation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Genys Dainius
spellingShingle Genys Dainius
The Role of Scientists in Lithuanian Energy Security Discourse Formation
Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
scientific research
lithuania’s energy security
discourse formation
discourse representation
author_facet Genys Dainius
author_sort Genys Dainius
title The Role of Scientists in Lithuanian Energy Security Discourse Formation
title_short The Role of Scientists in Lithuanian Energy Security Discourse Formation
title_full The Role of Scientists in Lithuanian Energy Security Discourse Formation
title_fullStr The Role of Scientists in Lithuanian Energy Security Discourse Formation
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Scientists in Lithuanian Energy Security Discourse Formation
title_sort role of scientists in lithuanian energy security discourse formation
publisher Sciendo
series Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
issn 2029-0454
publishDate 2013-06-01
description The aim of the article is to investigate the participation of scientists in the energy security discourse. The empirical research was carried out on the basis of qualitative access while conducting semi-structured interviews with representatives from different branches of science. As the results of the analysis show, despite the strained relations between scientific knowledge and power, Lithuanian scientists do not succeed in converting scientific knowledge into power. Even though scientists have enough knowledge, it is not transformed into power relations due to an existing specific context and the passive role of scientists themselves. Emerging decision-makers’ efforts to eliminate scientists from Lithuanian energy security discourse formation pushes the latter into the vague situation in which it is difficult to expand their share of expectations. Analyses of the scientific discourse show that scientists interpret the energy events in a broader context: while analysing the processes and specific projects that seek to improve energy security, they notice a more comprehensive view and manage to identify advantages, disadvantages and uncertainties of the latter. While marking out the peculiarities of energy security discourse, it may be claimed that the role of the scientists is not significant; realizing the development of energy system there has not created an institutional mechanism for scientific expertise; scientists are not being involved and they do not rush to participate in the formation of energy security discourse. They equate the distribution of information with the publishing of knowledge in the scientific world.
topic scientific research
lithuania’s energy security
discourse formation
discourse representation
url https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2013-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT genysdainius theroleofscientistsinlithuanianenergysecuritydiscourseformation
AT genysdainius roleofscientistsinlithuanianenergysecuritydiscourseformation
_version_ 1717782888653520896