Retraction Note: Comparison of 0.05% cyclosporine and 3% diquafosol solution for dry eye patients: a randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.
Main Authors: | Chang Hyun Park, Hyung Keun Lee, Mee Kum Kim, Eun Chul Kim, Jae Yong Kim, Tae-im Kim, Hong Kyun Kim, Jong Suk Song, Kyung Chul Yoon, Do Hyung Lee, Tae-Young Chung, Chul Young Choi, Hyun Seung Kim |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01524-8 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of 0.05% cyclosporine and 3% diquafosol solution for dry eye patients: a randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial
by: Chang Hyun Park, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Effectiveness and Optical Quality of Topical 3.0% Diquafosol versus 0.05% Cyclosporine A in Dry Eye Patients following Cataract Surgery
by: Jang Hoon Lee, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Topical application of 0.05% cyclosporine A as an adjunct to LASIK
by: E. V. Kudryashova, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
The effect of topical 0.05% cyclosporine on recurrence following pterygium surgery
by: Turan-Vural E, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Clinical effectiveness of diquafosol ophthalmic solution 3% in Korean patients with dry eye disease: a multicenter prospective observational study
by: Youngsub Eom, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)