The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
Deciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimente...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.192039 |
id |
doaj-b0e60505dafd442da0cd3c9f118fc79b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b0e60505dafd442da0cd3c9f118fc79b2020-11-25T04:07:54ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032020-03-017310.1098/rsos.192039192039The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)Hugo HarbersDimitri NeauxKatia OrtizBarbara BlancFlavie LaurensIsabelle BalyCécile CallouRenate SchafbergAshleigh HarudaFrançois LecompteFrançois CasabiancaJacqueline StuderSabrina RenaudRaphael CornetteYann LocatelliJean-Denis VigneAnthony HerrelThomas CucchiDeciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimented with the effect of mobility reduction on the skeleton of wild boar (Sus scrofa), using the calcaneus shape as a possible phenotypic marker. We first assessed differences in shape variation and covariation in captive-reared and wild-caught wild boars, taking into account differences in sex, body mass, available space for movement and muscle force. This plastic signal was then contrasted with the phenotypic changes induced by selective breeding in domestic pigs. We found that mobility reduction induces a plastic response beyond the shape variation of wild boars in their natural habitat, associated with a reduction in the range of locomotor behaviours and muscle loads. This plastic signal of captivity in the calcaneus shape differs from the main changes induced by selective breeding for larger muscle and earlier development that impacted the pigs' calcaneus shape in a much greater extent than the mobility reduction during the domestication process of their wild ancestors.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.192039domesticationwild boarphenotypic plasticitylocomotiongeometric morphometricsexperimentation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hugo Harbers Dimitri Neaux Katia Ortiz Barbara Blanc Flavie Laurens Isabelle Baly Cécile Callou Renate Schafberg Ashleigh Haruda François Lecompte François Casabianca Jacqueline Studer Sabrina Renaud Raphael Cornette Yann Locatelli Jean-Denis Vigne Anthony Herrel Thomas Cucchi |
spellingShingle |
Hugo Harbers Dimitri Neaux Katia Ortiz Barbara Blanc Flavie Laurens Isabelle Baly Cécile Callou Renate Schafberg Ashleigh Haruda François Lecompte François Casabianca Jacqueline Studer Sabrina Renaud Raphael Cornette Yann Locatelli Jean-Denis Vigne Anthony Herrel Thomas Cucchi The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa) Royal Society Open Science domestication wild boar phenotypic plasticity locomotion geometric morphometrics experimentation |
author_facet |
Hugo Harbers Dimitri Neaux Katia Ortiz Barbara Blanc Flavie Laurens Isabelle Baly Cécile Callou Renate Schafberg Ashleigh Haruda François Lecompte François Casabianca Jacqueline Studer Sabrina Renaud Raphael Cornette Yann Locatelli Jean-Denis Vigne Anthony Herrel Thomas Cucchi |
author_sort |
Hugo Harbers |
title |
The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa) |
title_short |
The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa) |
title_full |
The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa) |
title_fullStr |
The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa) |
title_sort |
mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (sus scrofa) |
publisher |
The Royal Society |
series |
Royal Society Open Science |
issn |
2054-5703 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Deciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimented with the effect of mobility reduction on the skeleton of wild boar (Sus scrofa), using the calcaneus shape as a possible phenotypic marker. We first assessed differences in shape variation and covariation in captive-reared and wild-caught wild boars, taking into account differences in sex, body mass, available space for movement and muscle force. This plastic signal was then contrasted with the phenotypic changes induced by selective breeding in domestic pigs. We found that mobility reduction induces a plastic response beyond the shape variation of wild boars in their natural habitat, associated with a reduction in the range of locomotor behaviours and muscle loads. This plastic signal of captivity in the calcaneus shape differs from the main changes induced by selective breeding for larger muscle and earlier development that impacted the pigs' calcaneus shape in a much greater extent than the mobility reduction during the domestication process of their wild ancestors. |
topic |
domestication wild boar phenotypic plasticity locomotion geometric morphometrics experimentation |
url |
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.192039 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hugoharbers themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT dimitrineaux themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT katiaortiz themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT barbarablanc themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT flavielaurens themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT isabellebaly themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT cecilecallou themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT renateschafberg themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT ashleighharuda themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT francoislecompte themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT francoiscasabianca themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT jacquelinestuder themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT sabrinarenaud themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT raphaelcornette themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT yannlocatelli themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT jeandenisvigne themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT anthonyherrel themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT thomascucchi themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT hugoharbers markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT dimitrineaux markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT katiaortiz markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT barbarablanc markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT flavielaurens markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT isabellebaly markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT cecilecallou markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT renateschafberg markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT ashleighharuda markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT francoislecompte markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT francoiscasabianca markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT jacquelinestuder markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT sabrinarenaud markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT raphaelcornette markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT yannlocatelli markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT jeandenisvigne markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT anthonyherrel markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa AT thomascucchi markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa |
_version_ |
1724427522470313984 |