The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)

Deciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimente...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugo Harbers, Dimitri Neaux, Katia Ortiz, Barbara Blanc, Flavie Laurens, Isabelle Baly, Cécile Callou, Renate Schafberg, Ashleigh Haruda, François Lecompte, François Casabianca, Jacqueline Studer, Sabrina Renaud, Raphael Cornette, Yann Locatelli, Jean-Denis Vigne, Anthony Herrel, Thomas Cucchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2020-03-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.192039
id doaj-b0e60505dafd442da0cd3c9f118fc79b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0e60505dafd442da0cd3c9f118fc79b2020-11-25T04:07:54ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032020-03-017310.1098/rsos.192039192039The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)Hugo HarbersDimitri NeauxKatia OrtizBarbara BlancFlavie LaurensIsabelle BalyCécile CallouRenate SchafbergAshleigh HarudaFrançois LecompteFrançois CasabiancaJacqueline StuderSabrina RenaudRaphael CornetteYann LocatelliJean-Denis VigneAnthony HerrelThomas CucchiDeciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimented with the effect of mobility reduction on the skeleton of wild boar (Sus scrofa), using the calcaneus shape as a possible phenotypic marker. We first assessed differences in shape variation and covariation in captive-reared and wild-caught wild boars, taking into account differences in sex, body mass, available space for movement and muscle force. This plastic signal was then contrasted with the phenotypic changes induced by selective breeding in domestic pigs. We found that mobility reduction induces a plastic response beyond the shape variation of wild boars in their natural habitat, associated with a reduction in the range of locomotor behaviours and muscle loads. This plastic signal of captivity in the calcaneus shape differs from the main changes induced by selective breeding for larger muscle and earlier development that impacted the pigs' calcaneus shape in a much greater extent than the mobility reduction during the domestication process of their wild ancestors.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.192039domesticationwild boarphenotypic plasticitylocomotiongeometric morphometricsexperimentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hugo Harbers
Dimitri Neaux
Katia Ortiz
Barbara Blanc
Flavie Laurens
Isabelle Baly
Cécile Callou
Renate Schafberg
Ashleigh Haruda
François Lecompte
François Casabianca
Jacqueline Studer
Sabrina Renaud
Raphael Cornette
Yann Locatelli
Jean-Denis Vigne
Anthony Herrel
Thomas Cucchi
spellingShingle Hugo Harbers
Dimitri Neaux
Katia Ortiz
Barbara Blanc
Flavie Laurens
Isabelle Baly
Cécile Callou
Renate Schafberg
Ashleigh Haruda
François Lecompte
François Casabianca
Jacqueline Studer
Sabrina Renaud
Raphael Cornette
Yann Locatelli
Jean-Denis Vigne
Anthony Herrel
Thomas Cucchi
The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
Royal Society Open Science
domestication
wild boar
phenotypic plasticity
locomotion
geometric morphometrics
experimentation
author_facet Hugo Harbers
Dimitri Neaux
Katia Ortiz
Barbara Blanc
Flavie Laurens
Isabelle Baly
Cécile Callou
Renate Schafberg
Ashleigh Haruda
François Lecompte
François Casabianca
Jacqueline Studer
Sabrina Renaud
Raphael Cornette
Yann Locatelli
Jean-Denis Vigne
Anthony Herrel
Thomas Cucchi
author_sort Hugo Harbers
title The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_short The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_full The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_fullStr The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_full_unstemmed The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_sort mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (sus scrofa)
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Deciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimented with the effect of mobility reduction on the skeleton of wild boar (Sus scrofa), using the calcaneus shape as a possible phenotypic marker. We first assessed differences in shape variation and covariation in captive-reared and wild-caught wild boars, taking into account differences in sex, body mass, available space for movement and muscle force. This plastic signal was then contrasted with the phenotypic changes induced by selective breeding in domestic pigs. We found that mobility reduction induces a plastic response beyond the shape variation of wild boars in their natural habitat, associated with a reduction in the range of locomotor behaviours and muscle loads. This plastic signal of captivity in the calcaneus shape differs from the main changes induced by selective breeding for larger muscle and earlier development that impacted the pigs' calcaneus shape in a much greater extent than the mobility reduction during the domestication process of their wild ancestors.
topic domestication
wild boar
phenotypic plasticity
locomotion
geometric morphometrics
experimentation
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.192039
work_keys_str_mv AT hugoharbers themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT dimitrineaux themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT katiaortiz themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT barbarablanc themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT flavielaurens themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT isabellebaly themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT cecilecallou themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT renateschafberg themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT ashleighharuda themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT francoislecompte themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT francoiscasabianca themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT jacquelinestuder themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT sabrinarenaud themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT raphaelcornette themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT yannlocatelli themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT jeandenisvigne themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT anthonyherrel themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT thomascucchi themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT hugoharbers markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT dimitrineaux markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT katiaortiz markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT barbarablanc markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT flavielaurens markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT isabellebaly markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT cecilecallou markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT renateschafberg markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT ashleighharuda markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT francoislecompte markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT francoiscasabianca markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT jacquelinestuder markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT sabrinarenaud markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT raphaelcornette markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT yannlocatelli markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT jeandenisvigne markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT anthonyherrel markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT thomascucchi markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
_version_ 1724427522470313984