Structured reporting of brain MRI following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients

Abstract Background To compare the quality of free-text reports (FTR) and structured reports (SR) of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in patients following mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke treatment. Methods A template for SR of brain MRI examinations based on decision tre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Mönch, Tiberiu Andrisan, Kathleen Bernkopf, Benno Ikenberg, Benjamin Friedrich, Claus Zimmer, Dennis M. Hedderich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:BMC Medical Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00621-4
id doaj-b0e16138d97748db9369741183161e65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0e16138d97748db9369741183161e652021-05-30T11:46:08ZengBMCBMC Medical Imaging1471-23422021-05-012111710.1186/s12880-021-00621-4Structured reporting of brain MRI following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patientsSebastian Mönch0Tiberiu Andrisan1Kathleen Bernkopf2Benno Ikenberg3Benjamin Friedrich4Claus Zimmer5Dennis M. Hedderich6Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University MunichDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University MunichDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University MunichAbstract Background To compare the quality of free-text reports (FTR) and structured reports (SR) of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in patients following mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke treatment. Methods A template for SR of brain MRI examinations based on decision trees was designed and developed in house and applied to twenty patients with acute ischemic stroke in addition to FTR. Two experienced stroke neurologists independently evaluated the quality of FTR and SR regarding clarity, content, presence of key features, information extraction, and overall report quality. The statistical analysis for the differences between FTR and SR was performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test or the Chi-squared test. Results Clarity (p < 0.001), comprehensibility (p < 0.001), inclusion of relevant findings (p = 0.016), structure (p = 0.005), and satisfaction with the content of the report for immediate patient management (p < 0.001) were evaluated significantly superior for the SR by both neurologist raters. One rater additionally found the explanation of the patient’s clinical symptoms (p = 0.003), completeness (p < 0.009) and length (p < 0.001) of SR to be significantly superior compared to FTR and stated that there remained no open questions, requiring further consultation of the radiologist (p < 0.001). Both neurologists preferred SR over FTR. Conclusions The use of SR for brain magnetic resonance imaging may increase the report quality and satisfaction of the referring physicians in acute ischemic stroke patients following mechanical thrombectomy. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00621-4Structured reportingQuality assessmentMagnetic resonance imagingAcute ischemic strokeMechanical thrombectomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Mönch
Tiberiu Andrisan
Kathleen Bernkopf
Benno Ikenberg
Benjamin Friedrich
Claus Zimmer
Dennis M. Hedderich
spellingShingle Sebastian Mönch
Tiberiu Andrisan
Kathleen Bernkopf
Benno Ikenberg
Benjamin Friedrich
Claus Zimmer
Dennis M. Hedderich
Structured reporting of brain MRI following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients
BMC Medical Imaging
Structured reporting
Quality assessment
Magnetic resonance imaging
Acute ischemic stroke
Mechanical thrombectomy
author_facet Sebastian Mönch
Tiberiu Andrisan
Kathleen Bernkopf
Benno Ikenberg
Benjamin Friedrich
Claus Zimmer
Dennis M. Hedderich
author_sort Sebastian Mönch
title Structured reporting of brain MRI following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_short Structured reporting of brain MRI following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_full Structured reporting of brain MRI following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_fullStr Structured reporting of brain MRI following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_full_unstemmed Structured reporting of brain MRI following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_sort structured reporting of brain mri following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Imaging
issn 1471-2342
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background To compare the quality of free-text reports (FTR) and structured reports (SR) of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in patients following mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke treatment. Methods A template for SR of brain MRI examinations based on decision trees was designed and developed in house and applied to twenty patients with acute ischemic stroke in addition to FTR. Two experienced stroke neurologists independently evaluated the quality of FTR and SR regarding clarity, content, presence of key features, information extraction, and overall report quality. The statistical analysis for the differences between FTR and SR was performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test or the Chi-squared test. Results Clarity (p < 0.001), comprehensibility (p < 0.001), inclusion of relevant findings (p = 0.016), structure (p = 0.005), and satisfaction with the content of the report for immediate patient management (p < 0.001) were evaluated significantly superior for the SR by both neurologist raters. One rater additionally found the explanation of the patient’s clinical symptoms (p = 0.003), completeness (p < 0.009) and length (p < 0.001) of SR to be significantly superior compared to FTR and stated that there remained no open questions, requiring further consultation of the radiologist (p < 0.001). Both neurologists preferred SR over FTR. Conclusions The use of SR for brain magnetic resonance imaging may increase the report quality and satisfaction of the referring physicians in acute ischemic stroke patients following mechanical thrombectomy. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
topic Structured reporting
Quality assessment
Magnetic resonance imaging
Acute ischemic stroke
Mechanical thrombectomy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00621-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianmonch structuredreportingofbrainmrifollowingmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT tiberiuandrisan structuredreportingofbrainmrifollowingmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT kathleenbernkopf structuredreportingofbrainmrifollowingmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT bennoikenberg structuredreportingofbrainmrifollowingmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT benjaminfriedrich structuredreportingofbrainmrifollowingmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT clauszimmer structuredreportingofbrainmrifollowingmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT dennismhedderich structuredreportingofbrainmrifollowingmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients
_version_ 1721420072313946112