Effective Parameters to Improve the Quality of Educational Progress Evaluation View point Teachers and Managers of Men in Third Grade City Yazd High school in Educational Year 2009-2010

• Main Authors: Zohreh sadatmand, Mohammad hadi babaei
• Format: Article
• Language: fas
• Published: Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch 2009-11-01
• Series: آموزش و ارزشیابی
• Subjects: educational progress evaluation; organizational parameters; mental parameters; physical parameters; design of test questions parameters
• Online Access: http://jinev.iaut.ac.ir/article_521966_bf9aa950965f8a587c23f1ff42247a0e.pdf
• ISSN: 2345-6299; 2476-5627

The present study was performed with the aim of identification (Effective Parameters to Improve the Quality of Educational Progress Evaluation View point Teachers and Managers of Men in Third Grade City Yazd  High school in Educational Year 2009-2010).In this direction, this study focused on the role of organizational, mental and physical and the design of test questions parameters in Improve the Quality of Educational Progress Evaluation View point Teachers and Managers of Men in Third Grade City Yazd Highschool in Educational Year 2009-2010 of whom,22 Managers and 150 teachers were randomly selected. Research method was descriptive-surveying and research tool was questionnaire provided by researcher with 46 closed questions. Questionnaire simplicity was apparently evaluated and its validity was estimated to 93% by kronbakh α coefficient for Managers and teachers. Data of research was analyzed by descriptive and perceptive. On the basis of research data, it became clear that the effect of organizational, mental and physical parameters and design of test questions parameters on improving the quality of educational progress evaluation was more than average.Managers and teachers sample referred the most effect to mental parameters with average 3.94 and the lowest effect to organizational agents with average 3.60. The differences were significant about parameters like design of test questions in terms of responders positions(Managers,teacher) and physical parameters in terms of area (one and two) and effect of these factors in improving quality of educational progress evaluation and no significant difference was seen about other parameters in terms of position, area, education and record of service.