“Institutional conditions” as a sociological concept and its role in the development of social and professional requirements of the head of the internal affairs (the results of the survey of experts)

• Main Author: G. G. Panchenko
• Format: Article
• Language: Russian
• Published: Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University 2016-06-01
• Series: Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta: Seriâ 18, Sociologiâ i Politologiâ
• Subjects: органы внутренних дел; руководитель; служебная деятельность; социально-профессиональные требования; институциональные условия; относительная количественная оценка значимости; оценка степени единства мнений экспертов; law-enforcement bodies; head; performance management; socio-professional requirements; institutional conditions; the relative importance of quantitative evaluation; assessment of the degree of consensus of experts
• Online Access: https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/184
• ISSN: 1029-3736; 2541-8769

The article quantified the relative importance of social, general and specific professional requirements for the individual head of the internal affairs; requirements are considered as an empirical analogue of the institutional conditions for its performance, reliability estimates as the degree of unity experts. Methods of determining the evaluation of the significance and reliability of these estimates are based on the use of statistical analysis techniques. Thus, the assessment of the value is defined as the arithmetic mean of the ordinary, the reliability of which, however, as the main result of the survey of experts is far from obvious: big themselves magnitude of significance, however, may prove to be very unreliable values. In view of the foregoing, in this case it can be lost very feasibility of obtaining the individual assessment of the head as well as his activities as unreliable foundation as low reliability significances means a loss of confidence in the guarantees of the individual manager. The mathematical tool for evaluating the reliability indicator here is the spread of expert data - the dispersion of experts’ opinions expressed in quantitative terms, which allows comparison of significances, placing them on the priorities. To improve the reliability assessment of the arithmetic mean pre-treatment censoring sample expert values ​​has been made - prior their ordering ascending (construction of an ordered series), followed by cutting off in equal amounts (10% of the sample size), the extreme members of the series, on what basis and carried out the final calculation the arithmetic mean. Increased reliability is achieved at the same time due to exclusion from the collection of expert data of those who could potentially be the result of being obsessed with excessive caution or individual experts.