Knowledge Ambidexterity within a Business Context: Taking Stock and Moving Forward

Despite the increasing and recent interest in researching knowledge ambidexterity, there has been no attempt from scholarly research to map and structure extant research on this topic. The aim of this study is to fill this gap, thereby contributing to previous literature by increasing our understand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana María Serrano-Bedia, Marta Pérez-Pérez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10388
id doaj-b09d252bb9ad46bd9aae12c7fa76c8c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b09d252bb9ad46bd9aae12c7fa76c8c22021-09-26T01:29:44ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-09-0113103881038810.3390/su131810388Knowledge Ambidexterity within a Business Context: Taking Stock and Moving ForwardAna María Serrano-Bedia0Marta Pérez-Pérez1Business Administration Department (FFCCEE), University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, SpainBusiness Administration Department (FFCCEE), University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, SpainDespite the increasing and recent interest in researching knowledge ambidexterity, there has been no attempt from scholarly research to map and structure extant research on this topic. The aim of this study is to fill this gap, thereby contributing to previous literature by increasing our understanding of the research on knowledge ambidexterity. This paper employs a systematic literature review analysis on a sample of 20 academic papers extracted from the Web of Science database in June 2021. After illustrating the size, growth trajectory, geographic distribution, and key publishing journals in the sample, the paper analyses the intellectual structure and main foci of the research domain. The results show that this topic emerged in the late 2000s with a boom in research in the last 5 years and a clear predominance of quantitative studies. Moreover, content analysis reveals that both a clear definition of knowledge ambidexterity and its main components, knowledge exploration and exploitation, and a valid and reliable scale for measuring this concept are still lacking. The review has also revealed that the research domain on knowledge ambidexterity can be grouped into three different research lines, each of which relates to a different level of analysis—teams, intraorganisational processes within individual firms, and interorganisational collaborations—and concludes by identifying potential areas for future research on this topic that may help to advance in the consolidation of this particularly vibrant field.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10388knowledge managementknowledge ambidexterityreviewsystematic reviewexploitationexploration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana María Serrano-Bedia
Marta Pérez-Pérez
spellingShingle Ana María Serrano-Bedia
Marta Pérez-Pérez
Knowledge Ambidexterity within a Business Context: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
Sustainability
knowledge management
knowledge ambidexterity
review
systematic review
exploitation
exploration
author_facet Ana María Serrano-Bedia
Marta Pérez-Pérez
author_sort Ana María Serrano-Bedia
title Knowledge Ambidexterity within a Business Context: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
title_short Knowledge Ambidexterity within a Business Context: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
title_full Knowledge Ambidexterity within a Business Context: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
title_fullStr Knowledge Ambidexterity within a Business Context: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge Ambidexterity within a Business Context: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
title_sort knowledge ambidexterity within a business context: taking stock and moving forward
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Despite the increasing and recent interest in researching knowledge ambidexterity, there has been no attempt from scholarly research to map and structure extant research on this topic. The aim of this study is to fill this gap, thereby contributing to previous literature by increasing our understanding of the research on knowledge ambidexterity. This paper employs a systematic literature review analysis on a sample of 20 academic papers extracted from the Web of Science database in June 2021. After illustrating the size, growth trajectory, geographic distribution, and key publishing journals in the sample, the paper analyses the intellectual structure and main foci of the research domain. The results show that this topic emerged in the late 2000s with a boom in research in the last 5 years and a clear predominance of quantitative studies. Moreover, content analysis reveals that both a clear definition of knowledge ambidexterity and its main components, knowledge exploration and exploitation, and a valid and reliable scale for measuring this concept are still lacking. The review has also revealed that the research domain on knowledge ambidexterity can be grouped into three different research lines, each of which relates to a different level of analysis—teams, intraorganisational processes within individual firms, and interorganisational collaborations—and concludes by identifying potential areas for future research on this topic that may help to advance in the consolidation of this particularly vibrant field.
topic knowledge management
knowledge ambidexterity
review
systematic review
exploitation
exploration
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10388
work_keys_str_mv AT anamariaserranobedia knowledgeambidexteritywithinabusinesscontexttakingstockandmovingforward
AT martaperezperez knowledgeambidexteritywithinabusinesscontexttakingstockandmovingforward
_version_ 1716868867219783680