Examining the operational use of avalanche problems with decision trees and model-generated weather and snowpack variables
<p>Avalanche problems are used in avalanche forecasting to describe snowpack, weather, and terrain factors that require distinct risk management techniques. Although they have become an effective tool for assessing and communicating avalanche hazard, their definitions leave room for interpreta...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/20/3551/2020/nhess-20-3551-2020.pdf |
Summary: | <p>Avalanche problems are used in avalanche forecasting to describe
snowpack, weather, and terrain factors that require distinct risk
management techniques. Although they have become an effective tool for
assessing and communicating avalanche hazard, their definitions leave
room for interpretation and inconsistencies. This study uses conditional
inference trees to explore the application of avalanche problems over
eight winters in Glacier National Park, Canada. The influences of weather
and snowpack variables on each avalanche problem type were explored by
analysing a continuous set of weather and snowpack variables produced
with a numerical weather prediction model and a physical snow cover
model. The decision trees suggest forecasters' assessments are based on not only
a physical analysis of weather and snowpack conditions but
also contextual information about the time of season, the location, and
interactions with other avalanche problems. The decision trees showed
clearer patterns when new avalanche problems were added to hazard
assessments compared to when problems were removed. Despite
discrepancies between modelled variables and field observations, the
model-generated variables produced intuitive explanations for conditions
influencing most avalanche problem types. For example, snowfall in the past 72 h was
the most significant variable for storm slab avalanche problems, skier
penetration depth was the most significant variable for dry loose
avalanche problems, and slab density was the most significant variable
for persistent-slab avalanche problems. The explanations for wind slab
and cornice avalanche problems were less intuitive, suggesting potential
inconsistencies in their application as well as shortcomings of the
model-generated data. The decision trees illustrate how forecasters
apply avalanche problems and can inform discussions about improved
operational practices and the development of data-driven decision aids.</p> |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1561-8633 1684-9981 |