Common Errors in Digital Panoramic Radiographs of Patients with Mixed Dentition and Patients with Permanent Dentition

Purpose. To compare errors in digital panoramic radiographs of permanent and mixed dentitions. Methods. 143 and 146 digital radiographs of mixed and permanent dentitions were examined. Results. Significantly fewer errors presented in the mixed dentition. Positioning too forward significantly preval...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Peretz, Maya Gotler, Israel Kaffe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/584138
id doaj-b08dadd519e8441999b85ffc08d2d434
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b08dadd519e8441999b85ffc08d2d4342020-11-24T22:28:20ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362012-01-01201210.1155/2012/584138584138Common Errors in Digital Panoramic Radiographs of Patients with Mixed Dentition and Patients with Permanent DentitionBenjamin Peretz0Maya Gotler1Israel Kaffe2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, IsraelDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, IsraelDepartment of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, IsraelPurpose. To compare errors in digital panoramic radiographs of permanent and mixed dentitions. Methods. 143 and 146 digital radiographs of mixed and permanent dentitions were examined. Results. Significantly fewer errors presented in the mixed dentition. Positioning too forward significantly prevalent in the mixed dentition; slumped position and nonpositioning of chin properly were significantly prevailed in the permanent dentition. Blurred or shortened upper incisors were significantly more prevalent in the mixed dentition. Diagnostic ability could be improved by manipulating the brightness or contrast in nearly 45% of all radiographs. In the mixed dentition, tilting the chin down and a slumped position made the lower incisors significantly nondiagnostic. In the permanent dentition, tilting the chin down made the lower incisors to be significantly nondiagnostic. Conclusions. More errors were prevalent in panoramic radiographs of permanent dentitions. Properly positioning the patient is the most important factor in preventing a cascade of errors.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/584138
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Peretz
Maya Gotler
Israel Kaffe
spellingShingle Benjamin Peretz
Maya Gotler
Israel Kaffe
Common Errors in Digital Panoramic Radiographs of Patients with Mixed Dentition and Patients with Permanent Dentition
International Journal of Dentistry
author_facet Benjamin Peretz
Maya Gotler
Israel Kaffe
author_sort Benjamin Peretz
title Common Errors in Digital Panoramic Radiographs of Patients with Mixed Dentition and Patients with Permanent Dentition
title_short Common Errors in Digital Panoramic Radiographs of Patients with Mixed Dentition and Patients with Permanent Dentition
title_full Common Errors in Digital Panoramic Radiographs of Patients with Mixed Dentition and Patients with Permanent Dentition
title_fullStr Common Errors in Digital Panoramic Radiographs of Patients with Mixed Dentition and Patients with Permanent Dentition
title_full_unstemmed Common Errors in Digital Panoramic Radiographs of Patients with Mixed Dentition and Patients with Permanent Dentition
title_sort common errors in digital panoramic radiographs of patients with mixed dentition and patients with permanent dentition
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Dentistry
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Purpose. To compare errors in digital panoramic radiographs of permanent and mixed dentitions. Methods. 143 and 146 digital radiographs of mixed and permanent dentitions were examined. Results. Significantly fewer errors presented in the mixed dentition. Positioning too forward significantly prevalent in the mixed dentition; slumped position and nonpositioning of chin properly were significantly prevailed in the permanent dentition. Blurred or shortened upper incisors were significantly more prevalent in the mixed dentition. Diagnostic ability could be improved by manipulating the brightness or contrast in nearly 45% of all radiographs. In the mixed dentition, tilting the chin down and a slumped position made the lower incisors significantly nondiagnostic. In the permanent dentition, tilting the chin down made the lower incisors to be significantly nondiagnostic. Conclusions. More errors were prevalent in panoramic radiographs of permanent dentitions. Properly positioning the patient is the most important factor in preventing a cascade of errors.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/584138
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminperetz commonerrorsindigitalpanoramicradiographsofpatientswithmixeddentitionandpatientswithpermanentdentition
AT mayagotler commonerrorsindigitalpanoramicradiographsofpatientswithmixeddentitionandpatientswithpermanentdentition
AT israelkaffe commonerrorsindigitalpanoramicradiographsofpatientswithmixeddentitionandpatientswithpermanentdentition
_version_ 1725746676666204160