Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain
Abstract Although significant advances in clinical monitoring technology and clinical practice development have taken place in the last several decades, in this editorial we argue that much more still needs to be done. We begin by identifying many of the improvements in perioperative technology that...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Anesthesiology |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-018-0504-x |
id |
doaj-b076e2b7a8c248ada64fa57c7350ba76 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b076e2b7a8c248ada64fa57c7350ba762020-11-25T03:17:13ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532018-04-011811510.1186/s12871-018-0504-xAdvances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remainD. John Doyle0Ashraf A. Dahaba1Yannick LeManach2Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve UniversityPriv.-Doz. Dr.med.university, Division of General Anaesthesiology, Emergency- and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of GrazDepartments of Anesthesia & Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityAbstract Although significant advances in clinical monitoring technology and clinical practice development have taken place in the last several decades, in this editorial we argue that much more still needs to be done. We begin by identifying many of the improvements in perioperative technology that have become available in recent years; these include electroencephalographic depth of anesthesia monitoring, bedside ultrasonography, advanced neuromuscular transmission monitoring systems, and other developments. We then discuss some of the perioperative technical challenges that remain to be satisfactorily addressed, such as products that incorporate poor software design or offer a confusing user interface. Finally we suggest that the journal support initiatives to help remedy this problem by publishing reports on the evaluation of medical equipment as a means to restore the link between clinical research and clinical end-users.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-018-0504-x |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
D. John Doyle Ashraf A. Dahaba Yannick LeManach |
spellingShingle |
D. John Doyle Ashraf A. Dahaba Yannick LeManach Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain BMC Anesthesiology |
author_facet |
D. John Doyle Ashraf A. Dahaba Yannick LeManach |
author_sort |
D. John Doyle |
title |
Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain |
title_short |
Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain |
title_full |
Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain |
title_fullStr |
Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain |
title_full_unstemmed |
Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain |
title_sort |
advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Anesthesiology |
issn |
1471-2253 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Although significant advances in clinical monitoring technology and clinical practice development have taken place in the last several decades, in this editorial we argue that much more still needs to be done. We begin by identifying many of the improvements in perioperative technology that have become available in recent years; these include electroencephalographic depth of anesthesia monitoring, bedside ultrasonography, advanced neuromuscular transmission monitoring systems, and other developments. We then discuss some of the perioperative technical challenges that remain to be satisfactorily addressed, such as products that incorporate poor software design or offer a confusing user interface. Finally we suggest that the journal support initiatives to help remedy this problem by publishing reports on the evaluation of medical equipment as a means to restore the link between clinical research and clinical end-users. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-018-0504-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT djohndoyle advancesinanesthesiatechnologyareimprovingpatientcarebutmanychallengesremain AT ashrafadahaba advancesinanesthesiatechnologyareimprovingpatientcarebutmanychallengesremain AT yannicklemanach advancesinanesthesiatechnologyareimprovingpatientcarebutmanychallengesremain |
_version_ |
1724632666796457984 |