Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Every individual mode of health education has its own merits, drawbacks as well as their own sphere of effectiveness. A specific mode of communication is more useful in a specific setting on a specific group than others. To search fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Poddar Era, Saha Asim, Mankad Minal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-08-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/88
id doaj-b072b3e5011447dca9fd8caa1e9cc84a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b072b3e5011447dca9fd8caa1e9cc84a2020-11-24T21:35:02ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582005-08-01518810.1186/1471-2458-5-88Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conferencePoddar EraSaha AsimMankad Minal<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Every individual mode of health education has its own merits, drawbacks as well as their own sphere of effectiveness. A specific mode of communication is more useful in a specific setting on a specific group than others. To search for optimum mode of communication for a specific audience is a major area of research in health education. The issue of imparting health education to a gathering of educated people, representing different fields of knowledge has remained a relatively less lighted aspect of health education research. In this backdrop this study was initiated for making a comparative assessment of different methods of dissemination of health education among educated people.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional interviewer administered questionnaire survey was conducted involving 142 randomly selected subjects during the last session of a five-day conference having health as main theme when the opinion of the delegates regarding different communication methods was asked for. Collected data was analyzed not only to find out the optimum mode of education dissemination in such a setting but also to find the contribution of different factors in the preferences of the study subjects.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The participants opted more (60%) for focused programs of smaller audience (sectional program). In both broad area (main program) and focused area programs (sectional), the participants preferred lectures (62% and 65.7% respectively). Specific topics were preferred both in lectures (67.6%) and symposia (57.7%). In the exhibition, exhibits seemed to be more attractive (62%) than the posters. Qualification has emerged to be a contributing factor in peoples' choice towards sectional programme and also in their affinity to symposia. Increased age was a significant contributor in participants' preference towards specific topics. Physical barriers of communication appeared to be a problem in the main program as well as in the exhibition. Lack of coherence among the speakers was reported (69%) to be a major reason for which symposia was not preferred.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study concluded that while planning for health education dissemination in an educated group a focused programme should be formulated in small groups preferably in the form of lectures on specific topics, more so while dealing with participants of higher age group having higher educational qualification.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/88
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Poddar Era
Saha Asim
Mankad Minal
spellingShingle Poddar Era
Saha Asim
Mankad Minal
Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
BMC Public Health
author_facet Poddar Era
Saha Asim
Mankad Minal
author_sort Poddar Era
title Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_short Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_full Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_fullStr Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_sort effectiveness of different methods of health education: a comparative assessment in a scientific conference
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2005-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Every individual mode of health education has its own merits, drawbacks as well as their own sphere of effectiveness. A specific mode of communication is more useful in a specific setting on a specific group than others. To search for optimum mode of communication for a specific audience is a major area of research in health education. The issue of imparting health education to a gathering of educated people, representing different fields of knowledge has remained a relatively less lighted aspect of health education research. In this backdrop this study was initiated for making a comparative assessment of different methods of dissemination of health education among educated people.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional interviewer administered questionnaire survey was conducted involving 142 randomly selected subjects during the last session of a five-day conference having health as main theme when the opinion of the delegates regarding different communication methods was asked for. Collected data was analyzed not only to find out the optimum mode of education dissemination in such a setting but also to find the contribution of different factors in the preferences of the study subjects.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The participants opted more (60%) for focused programs of smaller audience (sectional program). In both broad area (main program) and focused area programs (sectional), the participants preferred lectures (62% and 65.7% respectively). Specific topics were preferred both in lectures (67.6%) and symposia (57.7%). In the exhibition, exhibits seemed to be more attractive (62%) than the posters. Qualification has emerged to be a contributing factor in peoples' choice towards sectional programme and also in their affinity to symposia. Increased age was a significant contributor in participants' preference towards specific topics. Physical barriers of communication appeared to be a problem in the main program as well as in the exhibition. Lack of coherence among the speakers was reported (69%) to be a major reason for which symposia was not preferred.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study concluded that while planning for health education dissemination in an educated group a focused programme should be formulated in small groups preferably in the form of lectures on specific topics, more so while dealing with participants of higher age group having higher educational qualification.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/88
work_keys_str_mv AT poddarera effectivenessofdifferentmethodsofhealtheducationacomparativeassessmentinascientificconference
AT sahaasim effectivenessofdifferentmethodsofhealtheducationacomparativeassessmentinascientificconference
AT mankadminal effectivenessofdifferentmethodsofhealtheducationacomparativeassessmentinascientificconference
_version_ 1725946975525797888