Reflective Efficacy

Reflective Efficacy

The purpose of this paper is to highlight some difficulties of Neil Sinhababu’s Humean theory of agency, which depend on his radically reductivist approach, rather than to his Humean sympathies. The argument is that Sinhababu’s theory builds upon a critique of reflective agency which is based on equ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carla Bagnoli
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Mimesis Edizioni, Milano 2018-04-01
Series:Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
Subjects:
Humean Theory
Rational Deliberation
Agency
Authority
Christine Korsgaard
Online Access:https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2018.0006/821
id doaj-b06dd4139a7e4a5b9399fd567f65539a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b06dd4139a7e4a5b9399fd567f65539a2020-11-25T00:20:54ZdeuMimesis Edizioni, MilanoRivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia2039-46672239-26292018-04-0191677210.4453/rifp.2018.0006Reflective EfficacyCarla BagnoliThe purpose of this paper is to highlight some difficulties of Neil Sinhababu’s Humean theory of agency, which depend on his radically reductivist approach, rather than to his Humean sympathies. The argument is that Sinhababu’s theory builds upon a critique of reflective agency which is based on equivocation and misunderstandings of the Kantian approach. Ultimately, the objection is that his reductivist view is unequipped to address the rclassical problems of rational deliberation and agential authority.https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2018.0006/821Humean TheoryRational DeliberationAgencyAuthorityChristine Korsgaard
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carla Bagnoli
spellingShingle Carla Bagnoli
Reflective Efficacy
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
Humean Theory
Rational Deliberation
Agency
Authority
Christine Korsgaard
author_facet Carla Bagnoli
author_sort Carla Bagnoli
title Reflective Efficacy
title_short Reflective Efficacy
title_full Reflective Efficacy
title_fullStr Reflective Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Reflective Efficacy
title_sort reflective efficacy
publisher Mimesis Edizioni, Milano
series Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
issn 2039-4667
2239-2629
publishDate 2018-04-01
description The purpose of this paper is to highlight some difficulties of Neil Sinhababu’s Humean theory of agency, which depend on his radically reductivist approach, rather than to his Humean sympathies. The argument is that Sinhababu’s theory builds upon a critique of reflective agency which is based on equivocation and misunderstandings of the Kantian approach. Ultimately, the objection is that his reductivist view is unequipped to address the rclassical problems of rational deliberation and agential authority.
topic Humean Theory
Rational Deliberation
Agency
Authority
Christine Korsgaard
url https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2018.0006/821
work_keys_str_mv AT carlabagnoli reflectiveefficacy
_version_ 1725365188310335488

Similar Items