The difference in the thermal conductivity of nanofluids measured by different methods and its rationalization

A suspension of particles below 100 nm in size, usually termed as nanofluid, often shows a notable enhancement in thermal conductivity, when measured by the transient hot-wire method. In contrast, when the conductivity of the same nanofluid is measured by the laser flash method, the enhancement repo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aparna Zagabathuni, Sudipto Ghosh, Shyamal Kumar Pabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Beilstein-Institut 2016-12-01
Series:Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.7.194
id doaj-b0682c8200ca4bb781c5204602a325a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0682c8200ca4bb781c5204602a325a62020-11-24T21:36:28ZengBeilstein-InstitutBeilstein Journal of Nanotechnology2190-42862016-12-01712037204410.3762/bjnano.7.1942190-4286-7-194The difference in the thermal conductivity of nanofluids measured by different methods and its rationalizationAparna Zagabathuni0Sudipto Ghosh1Shyamal Kumar Pabi2Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal-721302, IndiaDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal-721302, IndiaDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal-721302, IndiaA suspension of particles below 100 nm in size, usually termed as nanofluid, often shows a notable enhancement in thermal conductivity, when measured by the transient hot-wire method. In contrast, when the conductivity of the same nanofluid is measured by the laser flash method, the enhancement reported is about one order of magnitude lower. This difference has been quantitatively resolved for the first time on the basis of the collision-mediated heat transfer model for nanofluids proposed earlier by our research group. Based on the continuum simulation coupled with stochastic analysis, the present theoretical prediction agrees well with the experimental observations from different measuring methods reported in the literature, and fully accounts for the different results from the two measuring methods mentioned above. This analysis also gives an indication that the nanofluids are unlikely to be effective for heat transfer in microchannels.https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.7.194Brownian movementcollision-mediated heat transfer modellaser flash methodnanofluidsthermal conductivitytransient hot-wire method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aparna Zagabathuni
Sudipto Ghosh
Shyamal Kumar Pabi
spellingShingle Aparna Zagabathuni
Sudipto Ghosh
Shyamal Kumar Pabi
The difference in the thermal conductivity of nanofluids measured by different methods and its rationalization
Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
Brownian movement
collision-mediated heat transfer model
laser flash method
nanofluids
thermal conductivity
transient hot-wire method
author_facet Aparna Zagabathuni
Sudipto Ghosh
Shyamal Kumar Pabi
author_sort Aparna Zagabathuni
title The difference in the thermal conductivity of nanofluids measured by different methods and its rationalization
title_short The difference in the thermal conductivity of nanofluids measured by different methods and its rationalization
title_full The difference in the thermal conductivity of nanofluids measured by different methods and its rationalization
title_fullStr The difference in the thermal conductivity of nanofluids measured by different methods and its rationalization
title_full_unstemmed The difference in the thermal conductivity of nanofluids measured by different methods and its rationalization
title_sort difference in the thermal conductivity of nanofluids measured by different methods and its rationalization
publisher Beilstein-Institut
series Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
issn 2190-4286
publishDate 2016-12-01
description A suspension of particles below 100 nm in size, usually termed as nanofluid, often shows a notable enhancement in thermal conductivity, when measured by the transient hot-wire method. In contrast, when the conductivity of the same nanofluid is measured by the laser flash method, the enhancement reported is about one order of magnitude lower. This difference has been quantitatively resolved for the first time on the basis of the collision-mediated heat transfer model for nanofluids proposed earlier by our research group. Based on the continuum simulation coupled with stochastic analysis, the present theoretical prediction agrees well with the experimental observations from different measuring methods reported in the literature, and fully accounts for the different results from the two measuring methods mentioned above. This analysis also gives an indication that the nanofluids are unlikely to be effective for heat transfer in microchannels.
topic Brownian movement
collision-mediated heat transfer model
laser flash method
nanofluids
thermal conductivity
transient hot-wire method
url https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.7.194
work_keys_str_mv AT aparnazagabathuni thedifferenceinthethermalconductivityofnanofluidsmeasuredbydifferentmethodsanditsrationalization
AT sudiptoghosh thedifferenceinthethermalconductivityofnanofluidsmeasuredbydifferentmethodsanditsrationalization
AT shyamalkumarpabi thedifferenceinthethermalconductivityofnanofluidsmeasuredbydifferentmethodsanditsrationalization
AT aparnazagabathuni differenceinthethermalconductivityofnanofluidsmeasuredbydifferentmethodsanditsrationalization
AT sudiptoghosh differenceinthethermalconductivityofnanofluidsmeasuredbydifferentmethodsanditsrationalization
AT shyamalkumarpabi differenceinthethermalconductivityofnanofluidsmeasuredbydifferentmethodsanditsrationalization
_version_ 1725940947540246528