Systematic Evaluation of the Safety Threshold for Allograft Macrovesicular Steatosis in Cadaveric Liver Transplantation

• Main Authors: Zhengtao Liu, Junjun Jia, Huaijun Ning, Shuping Que, Lin Zhou, Shusen Zheng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-01
• Series: Frontiers in Physiology
• Subjects: donor; macrovesicular steatosis; mortality; outcomes; liver transplantation
• Online Access: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00429/full

Background: Currently, 30% macrovesicular steatosis (MaS) content is usually assigned empirically as the boundary between “use” and “refuse” a donor liver for liver transplantation (LT); however, this cut-off is questionable due to the lack of systemic evidence of the efficiency relative to prognosis prediction. Clinicians have tried to identify the threshold for optimized utilization of marginal steatotic allografts, but controversy exists among different studies.Aim: Our study aimed to systematically determine an acceptable donor MaS content cut-off without incurring extra risk in liver transplantation, using meta-analysis.Methods: The relevant literature reporting the relationship between MaS content and post-transplant mortality/morbidity was searched and retrieved in Pubmed, Embase, and ISI Web of Science.Results: Nine studies were enrolled into the final analysis. A categorical comparison revealed that patients who received allografts with moderate steatosis (MaS content >30%) had significantly higher risks of graft failure/dysfunction, but not of mortality. Dose-response analysis showed that donor MaS content affected the graft failure/dysfunction in a non-linear relationship. Risks associated with MaS content in terms of poorer outcomes were independent of other risk covariates for liver transplantation. A non-significant increase in risk of inferior post-transplant outcomes was observed in patients who received allografts with a MaS content <35%. The risks of post-transplant graft failure and dysfunction increased with severe donor MaS content infiltration, without a consistent relationship.Conclusions: The threshold of allograft MaS content can be safely extended to 35% without additional risk burden on post-transplant inferior outcomes. Clarification on “the effects of stratification” for MaS content can provide theoretical evidence for further optimal utilization of marginal steatotic allografts in liver transplantation.