Neuroscience, Sincerity, and the Law

<p>This article focuses on the United States to consider how recent developments in neuroscience, specifically in the ability of researchers to measure directly certain types of brain activity through technologies such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), might be used so as to ren...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jonathan Kahn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bergen 2015-12-01
Series:Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Online Access:https://boap.uib.no/index.php/BJCLCJ/article/view/908
id doaj-b04dedc03bd54268a07a7ce4fdd37431
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b04dedc03bd54268a07a7ce4fdd374312020-11-24T22:56:14ZengUniversity of BergenBergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice1894-41832015-12-013220322010.15845/bjclcj.v3i2.908566Neuroscience, Sincerity, and the LawJonathan Kahn0Michell Hamline School of Law<p>This article focuses on the United States to consider how recent developments in neuroscience, specifically in the ability of researchers to measure directly certain types of brain activity through technologies such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), might be used so as to render states of mind, such as sincerity, measurable as “objective facts” on a par with other observable phenomena for the purposes of resolving specific legal cases.  The primary focus will be on sincerity itself, particularly in relation to religious beliefs that are claimed as a basis for exemption for compliance with an existing statutory regime of general applicability.  Part One examines how the issue of sincerity has manifested in disputes concerning conscientious objections to participating in the military draft.  Part Two reviews the science of fMRI and consider issues raised by the use of fMRI scans as evidence in legal cases.  Part Three addresses these issues specifically as they might bear on considerations raised in the conscientious objector cases discussed in Part One.  It considers the challenges of applying fMRI technology to these sorts of cases.  Part Four considers the recent case of <em>Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc</em>., where the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a closed corporation’s claim under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to be exempt from complying with a provision of the Affordable Care Act concerning the provision of medical insurance to employees that covered certain forms of contraception because it substantially burdened the religious beliefs of its owners – effectively attributing their beliefs to the corporation.  The Court explicitly did <em>not</em> consider the sincerity of claims in this case, but this paper will explore how the adoption of fMRI technology could potentially change this approach.</p>https://boap.uib.no/index.php/BJCLCJ/article/view/908
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan Kahn
spellingShingle Jonathan Kahn
Neuroscience, Sincerity, and the Law
Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
author_facet Jonathan Kahn
author_sort Jonathan Kahn
title Neuroscience, Sincerity, and the Law
title_short Neuroscience, Sincerity, and the Law
title_full Neuroscience, Sincerity, and the Law
title_fullStr Neuroscience, Sincerity, and the Law
title_full_unstemmed Neuroscience, Sincerity, and the Law
title_sort neuroscience, sincerity, and the law
publisher University of Bergen
series Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
issn 1894-4183
publishDate 2015-12-01
description <p>This article focuses on the United States to consider how recent developments in neuroscience, specifically in the ability of researchers to measure directly certain types of brain activity through technologies such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), might be used so as to render states of mind, such as sincerity, measurable as “objective facts” on a par with other observable phenomena for the purposes of resolving specific legal cases.  The primary focus will be on sincerity itself, particularly in relation to religious beliefs that are claimed as a basis for exemption for compliance with an existing statutory regime of general applicability.  Part One examines how the issue of sincerity has manifested in disputes concerning conscientious objections to participating in the military draft.  Part Two reviews the science of fMRI and consider issues raised by the use of fMRI scans as evidence in legal cases.  Part Three addresses these issues specifically as they might bear on considerations raised in the conscientious objector cases discussed in Part One.  It considers the challenges of applying fMRI technology to these sorts of cases.  Part Four considers the recent case of <em>Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc</em>., where the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a closed corporation’s claim under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to be exempt from complying with a provision of the Affordable Care Act concerning the provision of medical insurance to employees that covered certain forms of contraception because it substantially burdened the religious beliefs of its owners – effectively attributing their beliefs to the corporation.  The Court explicitly did <em>not</em> consider the sincerity of claims in this case, but this paper will explore how the adoption of fMRI technology could potentially change this approach.</p>
url https://boap.uib.no/index.php/BJCLCJ/article/view/908
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathankahn neurosciencesincerityandthelaw
_version_ 1725654152211595264