Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?
The chapter summarizes and discusses the main topics, developments and issues of Czech administrative reform, based on desk research, secondary literature on developments of administrative reform in the country and input obtained through mapping and analyzing ESF / ESIF support and interviews with e...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2018-06-01
|
Series: | NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/nispa.2018.11.issue-1/nispa-2018-0007/nispa-2018-0007.xml?format=INT |
id |
doaj-b04768b6e3084c2abddd03ee621a8e88 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b04768b6e3084c2abddd03ee621a8e882020-11-25T01:12:20ZengSciendoNISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy1337-90381338-43092018-06-0111115518210.2478/nispa-2018-0007nispa-2018-0007Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?Špaček David0Associate Professor, Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.The chapter summarizes and discusses the main topics, developments and issues of Czech administrative reform, based on desk research, secondary literature on developments of administrative reform in the country and input obtained through mapping and analyzing ESF / ESIF support and interviews with employees of central bodies that are responsible for the coordination and evaluation of the use of ESF / ESIF support. It is based on findings prepared within the project European Public Administration Country Knowledge (EUPACK) that focused on researching dynamics of public administration in EU member states and the contribution of external support to improving public administration quality. The research indicates that partial results have been accomplished particularly in the following areas: openness and transparency, quality management implementation (by municipalities and regions) and e-government. Civil-service legislation has been consolidated rather recently, yet has changed various times, and this undermines every effort to evaluate its effects. A national PA evaluation system is being developed by the Ministry of the Interior but focuses (similarly to PA strategies and related operational programmes) on input indicators. This raises questions about possibilities to evaluate actual quality in PA and results of projects implemented within PA reforms.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/nispa.2018.11.issue-1/nispa-2018-0007/nispa-2018-0007.xml?format=INTpublic administration reformCzechiacivil servicee-governmentquality management |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Špaček David |
spellingShingle |
Špaček David Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ? NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy public administration reform Czechia civil service e-government quality management |
author_facet |
Špaček David |
author_sort |
Špaček David |
title |
Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ? |
title_short |
Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ? |
title_full |
Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ? |
title_fullStr |
Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ? |
title_sort |
public administration reform in czechia after 2000 – ambitious strategies and modest results ? |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy |
issn |
1337-9038 1338-4309 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
The chapter summarizes and discusses the main topics, developments and issues of Czech administrative reform, based on desk research, secondary literature on developments of administrative reform in the country and input obtained through mapping and analyzing ESF / ESIF support and interviews with employees of central bodies that are responsible for the coordination and evaluation of the use of ESF / ESIF support. It is based on findings prepared within the project European Public Administration Country Knowledge (EUPACK) that focused on researching dynamics of public administration in EU member states and the contribution of external support to improving public administration quality. The research indicates that partial results have been accomplished particularly in the following areas: openness and transparency, quality management implementation (by municipalities and regions) and e-government. Civil-service legislation has been consolidated rather recently, yet has changed various times, and this undermines every effort to evaluate its effects. A national PA evaluation system is being developed by the Ministry of the Interior but focuses (similarly to PA strategies and related operational programmes) on input indicators. This raises questions about possibilities to evaluate actual quality in PA and results of projects implemented within PA reforms. |
topic |
public administration reform Czechia civil service e-government quality management |
url |
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/nispa.2018.11.issue-1/nispa-2018-0007/nispa-2018-0007.xml?format=INT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT spacekdavid publicadministrationreforminczechiaafter2000ambitiousstrategiesandmodestresults |
_version_ |
1725167063860772864 |