Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?

The chapter summarizes and discusses the main topics, developments and issues of Czech administrative reform, based on desk research, secondary literature on developments of administrative reform in the country and input obtained through mapping and analyzing ESF / ESIF support and interviews with e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Špaček David
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-06-01
Series:NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/nispa.2018.11.issue-1/nispa-2018-0007/nispa-2018-0007.xml?format=INT
id doaj-b04768b6e3084c2abddd03ee621a8e88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b04768b6e3084c2abddd03ee621a8e882020-11-25T01:12:20ZengSciendoNISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy1337-90381338-43092018-06-0111115518210.2478/nispa-2018-0007nispa-2018-0007Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?Špaček David0Associate Professor, Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.The chapter summarizes and discusses the main topics, developments and issues of Czech administrative reform, based on desk research, secondary literature on developments of administrative reform in the country and input obtained through mapping and analyzing ESF / ESIF support and interviews with employees of central bodies that are responsible for the coordination and evaluation of the use of ESF / ESIF support. It is based on findings prepared within the project European Public Administration Country Knowledge (EUPACK) that focused on researching dynamics of public administration in EU member states and the contribution of external support to improving public administration quality. The research indicates that partial results have been accomplished particularly in the following areas: openness and transparency, quality management implementation (by municipalities and regions) and e-government. Civil-service legislation has been consolidated rather recently, yet has changed various times, and this undermines every effort to evaluate its effects. A national PA evaluation system is being developed by the Ministry of the Interior but focuses (similarly to PA strategies and related operational programmes) on input indicators. This raises questions about possibilities to evaluate actual quality in PA and results of projects implemented within PA reforms.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/nispa.2018.11.issue-1/nispa-2018-0007/nispa-2018-0007.xml?format=INTpublic administration reformCzechiacivil servicee-governmentquality management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Špaček David
spellingShingle Špaček David
Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
public administration reform
Czechia
civil service
e-government
quality management
author_facet Špaček David
author_sort Špaček David
title Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?
title_short Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?
title_full Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?
title_fullStr Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?
title_full_unstemmed Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?
title_sort public administration reform in czechia after 2000 – ambitious strategies and modest results ?
publisher Sciendo
series NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
issn 1337-9038
1338-4309
publishDate 2018-06-01
description The chapter summarizes and discusses the main topics, developments and issues of Czech administrative reform, based on desk research, secondary literature on developments of administrative reform in the country and input obtained through mapping and analyzing ESF / ESIF support and interviews with employees of central bodies that are responsible for the coordination and evaluation of the use of ESF / ESIF support. It is based on findings prepared within the project European Public Administration Country Knowledge (EUPACK) that focused on researching dynamics of public administration in EU member states and the contribution of external support to improving public administration quality. The research indicates that partial results have been accomplished particularly in the following areas: openness and transparency, quality management implementation (by municipalities and regions) and e-government. Civil-service legislation has been consolidated rather recently, yet has changed various times, and this undermines every effort to evaluate its effects. A national PA evaluation system is being developed by the Ministry of the Interior but focuses (similarly to PA strategies and related operational programmes) on input indicators. This raises questions about possibilities to evaluate actual quality in PA and results of projects implemented within PA reforms.
topic public administration reform
Czechia
civil service
e-government
quality management
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/nispa.2018.11.issue-1/nispa-2018-0007/nispa-2018-0007.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT spacekdavid publicadministrationreforminczechiaafter2000ambitiousstrategiesandmodestresults
_version_ 1725167063860772864